CNN: Iraq Christians Face ‘Bleak Future’

IRAQ CHRISTIANS FACE ‘BLEAK FUTURE’
By Joe Sterling

CNN
12/24/iraq.christians/?iref=mpstoryview
Dec 24 2008

(CNN) — It’s a bittersweet Christmas season for Joseph Kassab, who
grew up in Iraq under Saddam Hussein’s Baathist regime and now lives
in Detroit, Michigan. Tempering the season’s joy is his concern for
fellow Iraqi Christians, who have endured killings, displacement and
daily intimidation.

An Iraqi policeman checks security in a Baghdad church where midnight
Mass will be celebrated Wednesday.

1 of 3 Christians in Iraq face a "bleak future," said Kassab, executive
director of the Chaldean Federation of America, a nonprofit group
that helps Iraqi Christians.

"We are heading for a demise," he said. "It’s getting to the point
where it might be an ethnic cleansing in the future."

A recent U.S. government report focused on the plight of Iraq’s
Christian minority. U.S. diplomats and legislators are worried, too.

"I think the Christians are caught in the middle of a horrible
situation," said U.S. Rep. Anna Eshoo, a California Democrat of
Assyrian and Armenian ancestry.

She said Iraqi Christians are suffering as a result of "religious
cleansing," and she has urged more help for minorities who have fled
their homes in Iraq.

The Iraqi government has worked to be inclusive and accepting toward
Christians, but daily intimidation has cowed the Christian community,
with crosses removed from churches, priests afraid to wear their
clerical garb, the faithful reluctant to attend church, and churches
hiring private security guards.

Iraq’s Christian population has fallen from as many as 1.4 million
in 2003 to between 500,000 and 700,000 more recently, according to
the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom.

A recent commission report outlined chilling abuse that Christians
suffer in Muslim-dominated Iraq. It sounded an alarm about the
treatment of minorities such as Chaldo-Assyrian Christians, an ancient
people who embraced the Christian faith in its early years and still
speak a form of Aramaic, the language of Jesus. Read some of report’s
examples of violence against Iraqi Christians

The community has endured displacement, killings and kidnappings,
with churches being attacked and occupied.

The U.S. State Department’s International Religious Freedom Report for
2008 says two-thirds of Christians in Iraq are Chaldeans, a branch of
the Catholic Church. Almost a third are from the Assyrian Church of the
East. The rest include Syriac Christians, who are Eastern Orthodox;
Armenians, both Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox; and Anglicans
and other Protestants.

Christians and other minorities represented about 3 percent of Iraq’s
population before 2003, but many have fled to Jordan, Syria, Lebanon,
Turkey, and other countries.

The community includes many who are well-educated, including business
people and professionals. They live in Baghdad and Basra, as well as
in the city of Kirkuk and the autonomous Kurdish region.

The Christian community is predominant in northern Iraq’s Nineveh
province, in the big city of Mosul and in the nearby Nineveh Plain,
where many displaced Christians live.

Tensions in Nineveh province heightened a few months ago, after
provincial officials blocked the creation of local police forces for
the Nineveh Plain.

Then hundreds of Christians took to the streets in and around
Mosul. They were protesting the demise of a national measure that would
have included minority representation on the country’s provincial
councils. Fourteen Christians were killed in violence and many fled
their homes.

That prompted Eshoo to write to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice
in October about the "rapidly deteriorating conditions for Christians
in Mosul."

The commission’s Elizabeth Cassidy, an international legal specialist,
said the bias that Christians face in Iraq reflects "the growing lack
of diversity in that part of the world.

"It’s bad for these countries that they become all one religion,"
she said. She said she fears that Muslim extremists will become
predominant in Iraq.

The commission gathered information from the Christian refugees who
fled the sectarian violence in recent years.

"The ones we’ve talked to and who are outside seem to fear going
back. Despite the security gains, they don’t feel it’s safe enough
to go back," Cassidy said.

The commission made several recommendations for the U.S. government
in Iraq, such as ensuring fair provincial elections, training and
deploying police to vulnerable communities, making prevention of
minority abuse a priority, and distributing assistance funds fairly.

One proposal calls for amending the constitution to get rid of
language that gives Islam primacy. The constitution guarantees
religious freedom and rights to all people, including Christians,
but states unambiguously that "Islam is the official religion of the
state and is a foundation source of legislation."

Iraqi Christian activists, such as Michael Youash, project director
of the Iraq Sustainable Democracy Project in Washington, favor the
creation of a distinct region in the Nineveh Plain — where neither
Arabs nor Kurds predominate.

He cites part of the constitution that says it "shall guarantee the
administrative, political, cultural, and educational rights of the
various nationalities, such as Turkomen, Chaldeans, Assyrians, and
all other constituents."

Youash, who authored a paper on the Iraqi minority crises for
the American University International Law Review, warned that the
demographic changes will hurt Iraq because Assyrian Christians "are
disproportionately represented in Iraq’s professional and educated
elite."

"They are a significant component of the American administrative
structure in Iraq," he said. "This depletion of Iraq’s human capital
will have devastating effects throughout the country."

http://www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/meast/

Armenian Football Team Returns To Mount Ararat Emblem

ARMENIAN FOOTBALL TEAM RETURNS TO MOUNT ARARAT EMBLEM

Focus News Agency
Dec 24 2008
Bulgaria

Yerevan. The Armenian national football team, which had replaced
its emblem featuring a silhouette of Turkey’s Mount Ararat, known in
Turkey as Mount Agri, ahead of a match against Turkey in a World Cup
qualifying game in September, has recently started to use the old
emblem again, Turkish Zaman newspaper reports.

The previously new emblem of the Armenian national team, featuring
a tiger and a lion instead of the silhouette of Mount Ararat, was
introduced to the public at a September press conference in Yerevan,
with Armenian Football Federation President Ruben Hayrapetyan saying
that the change of emblem was due to demands from football fan
associations. Hayrapetyan also said at the time that the previous
emblem was not popular among fans of the national team.

Armenian Mining Industry Could Grind To A Halt – Ministry

ARMENIAN MINING INDUSTRY COULD GRIND TO A HALT – MINISTRY

Interfax
Dec 23 2008
Russia

Armenia’s mining industry could grind to a halt if metal prices do
not start to recover at the beginning of next year, Armenian Energy
and Natural Resources Minister Armen Movsisian told Interfax.

The drop in world metals prices has forced Armenian mines to scale
down production and exports, Movsisian said. Jobs and salaries are
being cut. "We could be looking at two scenarios if prices don’t
rise by February: either mining enterprises will be forced to shut
down indefinitely, or they will have to find additional investment
to reorganize production," he said.

The government will re-address the crisis in the country’s mining
industry in February, he said.

The government has already decided to intervene in resolving the
future of three major crisis-hit mining enterprises – the Zangezur
and Agarak copper-molybdenum plants and Kapan Mining, which operate
in Armenia’s Southern Ore Belt.

Movsisian said in the middle of November that agreement had been
reached with management at the three mines to avoid laying off staff
and to keep salaries intact if possible in the next three months.

Armenia Praises Iran’s Balanced Stance On Karabakh Conflict

ARMENIA PRAISES IRAN’S BALANCED STANCE ON KARABAKH CONFLICT

Fars News Agency
Dec 24 2008
Iran

TEHRAN (FNA)- Iran’s Supreme National Security Council (SNSC)
Undersecretary Ali Bagheri conferred with Armenian Defense Minister
Seyran Ohanian over mutual cooperation and regional security and
stability, the unresolved Nagorno-Karabakh conflict in particular.

At the meeting, the two officials noted the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict
settlement process, and underlined that Iran’s balanced standing on
the issue is important for the peaceful resolution of the conflict.

According to an Armenian Defense Ministry statement, Ohanian further
praised Iran’s "balanced position" on the Karabakh conflict.

The two officials also stressed that expansion of Tehran-Yerevan
cooperation serves the two countries’ interests and has a positive
influence on the entire region.

Bagheri and Ohanian also agreed that Iran-Armenia relationship
contributes to regional stability.

Iranian Official Discusses Closer Ties With Armenia

IRANIAN OFFICIAL DISCUSSES CLOSER TIES WITH ARMENIA

Fars News Agency
Dec 24 2008
Iran

TEHRAN (FNA)- Iran’s Supreme National Security Council Undersecretary
Ali Bagheri called for the expansion of Tehran’s economic and political
relations with neighboring Armenia at the start of a three-day visit
to Yerevan on Tuesday.

Bagheri met with Artur Baghdasarian, head of a similar body advising
President Serzh Sarkisian on national security, and other senior
Armenian officials.

"The parties stressed the need to raise Armenian-Iranian relations
to a strategic level," Baghdasarian’s office said in a statement. It
said the two men discussed ways of implementing large-scale bilateral
projects such as the construction of railway linking Armenia to Iran
and a pipeline to deliver Iranian petrol and diesel fuel to the South
Caucasus state.

Bagheri also discussed the projects at separate talks with Foreign
Minister Eduard Nalbandian. The Armenian Foreign Ministry did not
report further details.

Energy Minister Armen Movsisian said on Monday that work on the 300
kilometer pipeline will start next year and take two years. He said
Tehran and Yerevan will each cover half of its cost estimated at
between $200 million and $240 million.

Earlier this month, the two governments inaugurated the final section
of another pipeline that will enable Armenia to import natural gas
from Islamic Republic.

Movsisian and other officials in Yerevan have not yet announced any
dates for the start of Iranian gas supplies, though.

President Of Armenia Convenes Security Council Sitting

PRESIDENT OF ARMENIA CONVENES SECURITY COUNCIL SITTING

Trend
Dec 24 2008
Azerbaijan

The President of Armenia, Serzh Sargsyan, convened a sitting of
the Security Council today. Discussed were the results of the
non-official summit of Heads of State held in Kazakhstan last week
and the necessary preparation works targeted at the implementation
of the agreements reached.

In the context of the agreements reached in Kazakhstan on the
establishment of a special fund for the purpose of jointly
resisting the influence of the global financial crisis on the
states participating the summit, as well as the formation of quick
reaction forces within the framework of the Collective Security Treaty
Organization, the President of the republic instructed the heads of
corresponding agencies to present expert conclusions, determine the
functions deriving from those agreements, reported Public Radio.

BAKU: New OSCE Chairman Hopes For Progress In Settlement Of Nagorno-

NEW OSCE CHAIRMAN HOPES FOR PROGRESS IN SETTLEMENT OF NAGORNO-KARABAKH CONFLICT NEXT YEAR

Trend
Dec 24 2008
Azerbaijan

Azerbaijan, Baku, Dec. 24/ Trend News, E. Ostapenko/ OSCE (Organization
for Security and Cooperation in Europe) hope that there will be
progress in the settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict next year.

"We hope in 2009 we will see progress in this direction," Dora
Bakoyannis, new OSCE chairman and Greek foreign minister, said in
her interview with Trend News.

The OSCE chairman-in-office and Finnish foreign minister Alexander
Stubb officially handed over office of the chairman to the Greek
Foreign Minister Dora Bakoyannis at the meeting of the OSCE foreign
ministers held in Helsinki on Dec. 4. Greece will start OSCE
chairmanship on Jan. 1.

Bakoyannis said Greece believes that frequent meetings between
Azerbaijani and Armenian representatives will lead to the establishment
of mutual confidence which essential to solve the conflict.

The conflict between the two countries of the South Caucasus began
in 1988 due to Armenian territorial claims against Azerbaijan. Since
1992, Armenian Armed Forces have occupied 20% of Azerbaijan including
the Nagorno-Karabakh region and its seven surrounding districts. In
1994, Azerbaijan and Armenia signed a ceasefire agreement at which
time the active hostilities ended. The Co-Chairs of the OSCE Minsk
Group (Russia, France, and the US) are currently holding peaceful
negotiations.

"Greece fully supports these efforts and encourages constructive
engagement from both parties, in line with the Statement delivered at
the Helsinki Summit earlier this month by the French Foreign Minister
on behalf of the European Union," Bakoyannis said.

The last statement by the foreign ministers of the OSCE Minsk Group
co-chair countries says the Moscow declaration signed by the sides
opens new and promising stage in the general striving to establish
peace in the South Caucasus.

The sides confirmed their commitment to achieving resolution of the
Nagorno-Karabakh conflict within the Minsk Group and in line with the
Basic Principles elaborated by the co-chairmen through cooperation
with the Azerbaijani and Armenian leaders on basis of their proposals
made in Madrid last year.

The Moscow Declaration signed by the leaders of Azerbaijan, Russia
and Armenia in Moscow on Nov. 2 calls for reinforcing activities of
the sides to achieve peace in the region within the OSCE Minsk Group.

"We firmly support the territorial integrity and sovereignty of all
States, within their internationally recognized borders," Bakoyannis
said.

OSCE also cannot ignore the human pain caused by the current
situation. We believe that to help the establishment of security
and stability in the region, the thousands of Internally Displaced
Persons must return to their homes, she said.

Kolerov: What Russia Did During Crisis In The Caucasus Prevented Its

KOLEROV: WHAT RUSSIA DID DURING CRISIS IN THE CAUCASUS PREVENTED ITS GLOBAL GEOPOLITICAL DEFEAT
Dmitry Yermolayev

WPS Agency
DEFENSE and SECURITY (Russia)
December 24, 2008 Wednesday
Russia

AN INTERVIEW WITH REGNUM NEWS AGENCY MANAGING DIRECTOR MODEST KOLEROV;
An interview with Regnum News Agency Managing Director Modest Kolerov.

Question: How would you appraise the year of 2008? What were its
central events?

Modest Kolerov: Crisis and deployment of the Russian army in
hostilities abroad, the first such experience in two decades. The way
I see it, President Dmitry Medvedev Enhanced Coverage LinkingDmitry
Medvedev -Search using: Biographies Plus News News, Most Recent
60 Days formulated a new policy with regard to nearby foreign
countries. Bilateral contacts with these countries are to take
precedence over inefficient coalitions.

Question: What conclusions if any did the Russian authorities draw
from the crisis in the Caucasus?

Modest Kolerov: First, that Russia should be always ready for nasty
surprises. Second, that no foreign political rhetorics will protect
national interests or spare Russia outright hostility.

Question: This new doctrine of relations with post-Soviet
states… What are its prospects?

Modest Kolerov: This is a doctrine of the zones of privileged
interests. Acknowledgement of the reality will be the worst problem
encountered in the course of promotion of the doctrine. We have to
acknowledge the fact that foreign structures have all but killed
the idea of a new European security framework. They even torpedoed –
or at least tried to – the more understandable platform of stability
and security suggested by Turkey.

The West needs time to recover from the shocking discovery of its own
inefficiency. The West has been shown that its provocative militarist
behavior backfires.

As a matter of fact, the Western community is already recovering from
the shock. It found a scapegoat to pin the blame on – Saakashvili
the mad.

I expect no changes in connection with the future US Administration. It
is clear I believe that the West is not going to make NATO and other
Euro-Atlantic structures less aggressive.

Question: What do you expect in terms of processes of integration in
the Commonwealth?

Modest Kolerov: They will continue against the background of
ever increasing impoverishment and problems fomented by the
global crisis. Sure, unification with Belarus would have been
better on grounds and in the conditions healthier than Belarussian
default. Still, it will but offer additional stimuli for a common
economic zone. Same goes for Kazakhstan, by the way.

As for the CIS Collective Security Treaty Organization, I reckon that
it will keep restricting its influence and importance as a defense
alliance as well as its importance as an organization that requires
a great deal of solidarity. Not merely because Medvedev called it
an organization which is political first and military second. And
not because Organization Secretary General Bordyuzha said that
every member state is entitled to its own decision with regard to
Abkhazia and South Ossetia, i.e. their recognition. Not even because
this whole Organization flatly refuses to acknowledge the problem
of Nagorno-Karabakh, a vital problem for one of the members of the
Organization. It will simply happen. Importance of bilateral contacts
will keep increasing.

Question: Do you think Russia has sufficient mechanisms for promotion
of a foreign policy in the post-Soviet zone?

Modest Kolerov: No, I don’t think so. What really counts, however,
is that the foreign political measures our adversaries take are
usually combined – and that goes for all measures from humanitarian to
economic to political to military. We lack any even remotely analogous
consolidation. Interdepartmental rivalry and jealousy exists which in
itself is not bad. Whenever there is an energetic foreign policy, it is
this policy itself that formulates the agenda, and then even the least
energetic ministries and departments cannot help cleaning up their act.

Unfortunately, Russia’s foreign policy comes down to reaction rather
than to action. I sincerely believe that Medvedev’s and Putin’s
decisions this August were truly heroic… I really mean it.

Question: Russia is back in the Caucasus. What consequences will the
recent developments foment?

Modest Kolerov: Well, problems do exist. There is the problem posed by
Georgia that lacks stability. There is Turkey and there is Azerbaijan,
each of these countries increasing its clout with Georgia. All of that
is putting Armenia, Russia’s natural ally, in an even tighter blockade.

It is clear that should the Western community offer Georgia and
Azerbaijan some form of conditional or reduced membership in NATO (say,
without the voting rights but so that their military infrastructure
will be complete absorbed by the Alliance’s), Armenia will be placed
in a position where it will have to aspire to NATO membership too. It
will be its only way out.

Russia’s actions this August spared it a global geopolitical defeat. On
the other hand, what it accomplished did not solve all of the problems
by a long shot.

Question: What do you expect from the Karabakh situation now?

Modest Kolerov: Armenia’s adversaries will do everything in their power
to have Armenia withdraw from the security zone without guarantees
of Karabakh’s future status.

Question: What about Ukraine then?

Modest Kolerov: Ukraine is drowning in a socioeconomic chaos. It’s
of paramount importance for Russia not to be lured into pursuing
false objectives where Ukraine is concerned. Same goes for Ukraine,
by the way. In the meantime, a false objective is being forced
on Ukraine these days. I mean the conflict in the Crimea. There
are no Russian-Ukrainian conflicts on the peninsula. It is a
Slav-Tatar conflict that is more likely there. The Crimean Tatars
lack consolidation themselves because the Mejlis represents only
about one third of the Crimean Tatar population. It is certain
external forces that would like Kiev (and Moscow for that matter)
to concentrate on this false conflict. Yuschenko will definitely
benefit from a conflict, meaning that Russia should always remember
that it is walking on thin ice.

Question: A few words on Central Asia now. Considering the global
financial crisis, do you think it’s possible to avoid a social
explosion in the region? Will Russia have to step in?

Modest Kolerov: I think the explosion is inevitable and there is
preciously little Russia can do about it. Unfortunately, I do not think
that our leadership is fully aware of the gravity of the situation.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Armenian President Orders Investigation Into Violence In Detention C

ARMENIAN PRESIDENT ORDERS INVESTIGATION INTO VIOLENCE IN DETENTION CENTRES

Mediamax
Dec 24 2008
Armenia

Yerevan, 24 December: Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan held a working
meeting with Ombudsman Armen Harutyunyan today.

The Armenian president tasked the minister of justice and the
presidential aide on legal issues with carrying out a line-of-duty
investigation in connection with the increased number of complaints
of violence on the part of law-enforcers in detention facilities,
the presidential press service told Mediamax news agency.

Harutyunyan agreed to take part in the line-of-duty investigation.

BAKU: Armenian Flag In Tabriz

ARMENIAN FLAG IN TABRIZ
by Zahid Safaroglu

Yeni Musavat
Dec 17 2008
Azerbaijan

Muslim and "fraternal" Iran is constantly deepening its relations
with the occupier, Armenia. These relations do not only cover the
economic and commercial areas. They also cover numerous joint projects,
including the construction of a gas pipeline from Iran to Armenia
and a water reservoir on the river Araz, any more. At issue is also
the political and diplomatic contacts, which are expanding every
year. It is the result of intimacy between the occupying country and
the Persian regime of Iran that there is almost nothing left before
an Armenian consulate opens in Tabriz [which is the capital of Iran’s
East Azarbayjan province]

The statement by the minister of energy and natural resources of the
occupying country, Armen Movsisyan, after his meeting with Iranian
Foreign Minister Manuchehr Mottaki in Tehran leaves no doubt that
this is a real threat. If this is the case, the country called Iran
is demonstratively bracing itself to insult our people, play with
its feelings and concede us to the Armenians for another time. This
is because the existence of the Armenian embassy in Tehran is one
issue, while the opening of an Armenian consulate in Tabriz, which
is the moral and virtual capital of the united and great Azerbaijan,
is another issue.

Let us remember that they have been making initiatives to desecrate
Tabriz with an Armenian flag for a long time. But it is the first time
news has emerged that this initiative is so close to reality. That
is why the Azerbaijani Ministry of Foreign Affairs is obliged to
treat this issue flexibly and urge an explanation from Tehran. While
being a big city in a country called Iran, Tabriz is first of all
the great and ancient cradle of culture of the Azerbaijani people
and the beating heart of South Azerbaijan [northwestern Iran which
is predominantly populated by ethnic Azerbaijanis].

In other words, this issue can not be considered a purely domestic
matter of Iran. The opening of an Armenian consulate in Tabriz is
the same as the opening of the Armenian consulate in Azerbaijan. Can
you imagine it? So, what shall we do? Shall we sit and wait before
such a disgraceful event happens and the souls of the martyrs of
the 20 January massacre [by Soviet troops in Baku in 1990], Karabakh
[war in 1992-1994] and Xocali [massacre of Azerbaijani civilians by
Armenian troops in Nagornyy Karabakh 1992] are again disturbed?

Baku has another right to prevent this step by Iran. The matter
is that Azerbaijan has not opened a diplomatic mission in Israel,
which is considered to be Iran’s number one and eternal enemy, since
independence. The country has done so as a sort of gesture of good
will to Iran. In this sense, one should remind Iran a country which
harps on the solidarity of Muslim countries that Baku will immediately
open an embassy in Israel if an Armenian flag is installed in Tabriz.

But we think that voluntary patriotic forces in the south [northwestern
Iran] will prevent the opening of the Armenian consulate if the
Azerbaijani leadership can not do this in fear of Iran. In any case,
the national feelings and the feelings of revival are stronger in
the south than in the north [the Republic of Azerbaijan]. And this
creates certain confidence. But activists in the south also know that
by doing so the Tehran regime wants to test some people in the south,
insult or even break them.

To put it shortly, this is an issue of honour, a national matter both
for the south and for the north of Azerbaijan. Both for [Foreign]
Minister Elmar Mammadyarov and for [Azerbaijani] ambassador [to Iran]
Abbasali Hasanov. By the way, one may wonder what ambassador Hasanov
is thinking about this issue?

This behaviour by Tehran can not but cause outrage. Putting Turkey
aside, Iran has failed to behave at least as the Islamic Republic of
Pakistan, which has not allowed the opening of an Armenian embassy
on its territory and has not established any ties with the occupying
country so far. But our southern neighbour must know for sure that
by giving the green light for the opening of an Armenian consulate
in Tabriz, Iran will strengthen its image of a "lizard giving poison
to a snake" in Azerbaijan.

We have shown some form of tolerance to most anti-Azerbaijani moves
by Tehran, such as the infringement on our sea and air borders,
the persecution, arrest and abduction of activists in the south,
the opening of schools for a handful of Armenians in Iran while
the basic rights of ethnic Azerbaijanis to culture and education
are rudely violated and [Iran’s] relations with Armenia. But the
issue of the consulate is completely different. We are sure that
residents of Tabriz and Baku will not tolerate seeing an Armenian
flag in Tabriz and will rise and pickets will follow one another in
front of the Iranian embassy in Baku. But the primary condition for
our intellectuals in both countries, the national press and young
people is to be vigilant and show a position of citizens. So, let
our eyes and legs have more power!