Rotterdam unveils nominees

Variety, CA
Dec 13 2008

Rotterdam unveils nominees

‘Dogging’ will premiere in competition
By IAN MUNDELL

The Rotterdam Film Festival, one of the world’s leading events for
avant-garde pics, on Friday unveiled five of the 15 films that will
compete for its VPRO Tiger Awards plus the 35 projects selected for
co-production market CineMart.

Preeming in competition is Brit Simon Ellis’ feature debut, "Dogging:
A Love Story," about a boy obsessed with casual sex in parking lots.

It is joined by Ramtin Lavafipour’s "Be Calm and Count to Seven,"
about smugglers on an Iranian island, while Naito Takatsugu’s "Dark
Harbor" shows life in a Japanese fishing village.

"Breathless," by Yang Ik-june, unfolds the relationship between a
South Korean gangster and a precocious schoolgirl; from Taiwan, Leon
Dai’s "No puedo vivir sin ti" concerns a father whose vagrant
lifestyle endangers his family.

The Tiger jury includes South African artist Marlene Dumas, helmers
Yesim Ustaoglu from Turkey and Kornel Mundruczo from Hungary, and Park
Ki-yong, director of the Film Academy in Seoul.

Other world preems at the fest include U.S. docu "Fixer: The Taking of
Ajmal Naqshbandi" by Ian Olds, which recounts the tragic fate of a
guide and translator hired by journalists reporting in Afghanistan.

New films have been commissioned from Guy Maddin, Carlos Reygadas and
Nanouk Leopold. All three will create work for extra-large screens
mounted on three Rotterdam office blocks.

Also bowing in Rotterdam are "Dazzling," by Dutch helmer Cyrus Frisch,
featuring Rutger Hauer; "FILM IST. a girl & a gun" by Austrian Gustav
Deutsch; and "Border," by Armenian Harutyun Khachatryan.

The full competition lineup will be unveiled in early January.

Notable CineMart projects include oil industry tale "Pioneer" from
Norwegian helmer Erik Skjoldbjaerg, best known Stateside for his 1997
thriller "Insomnia," remade in 2002 by Christopher Nolan; and New
Zealand helmer Taika Waititi’s "Tama." Waititi’s debut, "Eagle vs
Shark" played at Sundance in 2007.

Fest unspools Jan. 21-Feb. 1, with the 26th CineMart running
Jan. 25-29.

stivals&jump=story&id=1061&articleid=V R1117997333&cs=1

http://www.variety.com/index.asp?layout=fe

Turkish politician: Keep quiet about 1915

United Press International
Dec 13 2008

Turkish politician: Keep quiet about 1915

ANKARA, Turkey, Dec. 12 (UPI) — A top Turkish official warns that
other countries could harm relations between Turkey and Armenia by
focusing on the 1915 killing of Armenians in Turkey.

Koksal Toptan, the speaker of the Turkish parliament, told Hurriyet in
an interview, that parliamentary resolutions calling the 1915 killings
"genocide" are problematic for the two nations.

"Politicians and parliaments cannot judge history," Toptan said.

Armenia and Turkey have not had diplomatic relations since Armenia
became independent of the Soviet Union in 1991. But President Abdullah
Gul visited Yerevan in September.

Toptan said he was concerned about President-elect Barack Obama’s
victory and his nomination of Hillary Clinton as U.S. secretary of
state, since both have supported Armenian groups in the United States.

The Turkish government denies that large numbers of Armenians were
deliberately killed in 1915. The word genocide was coined by Raphael
Lemkin, a Polish-Jewish lawyer, who cited the killings as one of his
inspirations.

Azerbaijan Demolishes Priceless Medieval Christian Monuments

Blogger News Network
Dec 13 2008

Azerbaijan Demolishes Priceless Medieval Christian Monuments And
Western Nations Yawn

Posted on December 13th, 2008 by The Stiletto in All News, Archeology
& Antiquities News, California News, History News, Michigan News,
Middle Eastern News, New Jersey News, Religious News, Society and
Culture, The United Nations, World Politics

In describing the Taliban’s destruction of the two colossal Buddhas of
Bamiyan in March 2001, The Wall Street Journal noted:

History has accustomed us to the persecutions that intolerance
exercises on those persons whom it intends to subjugate and to the
destructions inflicted on the monuments that represent their beliefs
and convictions. ¦ The case of Afghanistan is unprecedented.

Sadly, such `cultural genocide’ is by no means unprecedented,
according to architecture and design critic Robert Bevan. In his 2006
book, `The Destruction of Memory: Architecture at War’ (Reaktion Books
Ltd.), Bevan makes the case that throughout history, a crime against
humanity has inevitably been followed by the destruction of monuments,
because wiping out all traces that the victims ever existed `is both a
denial of a victor’s deeds and a mark of the incomplete nature of that
victory.’

To cite but one example, Bevan writes that while the Ottoman Turks
destroyed hundreds upon hundreds of churches, monasteries and
monuments during the Armenian Genocide, `Turks have continued to
remove, stone by stone, the evidence of millennia of Armenian
architectural and art history following the mass murder and exile of
the Armenian people.’

In the year before Bevan’s book was published, the medieval Armenian
Christian cemetery of Djulfa (Jugha in Armenian) in the Azerbaijani
exclave of Nakhichevan `vanished.’

For years, Azeris had toppled or vandalized the cemetery’s headstones
in retaliation for the six-year Nagorno-Karabakh War that ended in
1994 with 30,000 people dead, a million others displaced and resulted
in the creation of an independent republic out of a 1,700 square mile
area that Azerbaijan has claimed since the newly-established Soviet
Union redrew the borders between Armenia and Azerbaijan in 1921 and
put the regions of Nakhichevan and Nagorno-Karabakh on the Azeri side.

According to several accounts ` and a real-time videotape by observers
on the other side of the Araks river in Iran – in a final paroxysm of
violence over the course of a week beginning December 10, 2005 some
100 Azerbaijani soldiers smashed thousands of headstones to bits with
sledgehammers, throwing the chunks into the Araks. This documentary
(video link) incorporates footage from the videotape.

But these weren’t just any headstones. Known as khachkars (in Armenian
`khatch’ means cross and `kar’ means stone), they were unique
archeological artifacts ` intricately carved monuments between six and
eight feet high that dated back between the 9th to 16th centuries.

A June 2006 article in Archeology magazine notes that `[n]o formal
archaeological studies were ever carried out at the cemetery ¦ and
its full historical significance will never be known,’ and explains
the destruction of the cemetery as `symbolic violence against the dead
¦ used as an expression of modern enmity.’

Global Response Ranges From Indifferent To Ineffective ¦

In letters to members of Congress and the United Nations Educational,
Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), University of Chicago
anthropologist Adam T. Smith and a group of archaeologists from six
Western nations called the destruction of the cemetery `a violation of
the memories of ancestors and an assault upon the common cultural
heritage of humanity.’ Armenia’s foreign minister at the time Vartan
Oskanian sent his own letter to UNESCO in December 2005 that called
the destruction `tantamount to ethnic cleansing.’

Reps. Joe Knollenberg (R-MI) and Frank Pallone (D-NJ), co-chairs of
the Congressional Caucus on Armenian Issues, condemned the act of
cultural extermination in a letter to the Azerbaijani government,
prompting the Azeri ambassador to the U.S., Hafez Pashayev, to dispute
the videotaped evidence, and asserting that it was impossible to
identify either the cemetery as Armenian or the perpetrators as Azeri
soldiers.

After the Armenian National Committee of America initiated a fax
campaign to U.S. Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice demanding that our
government condemn this act of `cultural cleansing,’ Rep. Grace
Napolitano (D-CA), a member of the House Committee on International
Relations, followed up with an inquiry about the U.S. position on the
matter to Rice. Rice acknowledged that the State Department was aware
of the `allegations of desecration of cultural monuments’ and
indicated that the U.S. `encouraged Armenia and Azerbaijan to work
with UNESCO to investigate the incident.’ In other words, the official
U.S. position was to shrug and look the other way.

The European Parliament issued a resolution condemning the events at
Jugha in February 2006. In the typically namby-pamby multi-cultural EU
MO, the resolution aimed to offend no one. The `objective’ resolution
condemned Armenia and Azerbaijan for mutual crimes against cultural
heritage – though not one case of destruction of Azeri monuments by
Armenians was cited.)

Left unsaid by the resolution: Christian graves were desecrated. For
Armenians it is a particularly cruel blow as the one million genocide
victims who literally dropped dead in their tracks during the forced
march through the Syrian desert never received Christian rites and
proper burials, their bodies left to be fed upon by wild beasts as a
final act of humiliation by Ottoman Turks.

To this day, the European Parliament has yet to inspect the site to
verify the `allegations’ of its destruction, but in April 2006 a
reporter with the nonprofit, London-based Institute for War and Peace
Reporting (IWPR), attempted to ascertain the facts. Escorted by Azeri
security officers, he was kept away from the cemetery itself but was
close enough to see that there were no monuments or headstones left.

Writing about the IWPR’s findings, The Times of London noted that
`Foreign organisations had been unable to visit the cemetery because
it is in Nakhichevan, a tiny enclave of Azerbaijan cut off by Armenia
and Iran and accessible only by air’ and quoted a spokesman for the
Azerbaijani Foreign Ministry asserting that there had never been an
Armenian cemetery or any Armenian cultural relics in the area visited
by the IWPR.

In order to sustain this fiction, Azerbaijan denied access to the
cemetery to 10 EU Members of Parliament who had traveled to
Nakhichevan to check out IWPR’s report, according to this article
published in The Independent:

Fears that Azerbaijan has systematically destroyed hundreds of
500-year-old Christian artefacts have exploded into a diplomatic row,
after Euro MPs were barred from inspecting an ancient Armenian burial
site. ¦

The works – some of the most important examples of Armenian heritage –
are said to have been smashed with sledgehammers last December as the
site was concreted over. ¦

The president of Icomos, Michael Petzet, said: `Now that all traces of
this highly important historic site seem to have been extinguished all
we can do is mourn the loss and protest against this totally senseless
destruction.’

¦ And Now, To Ignominious

Adding insult to injury, earlier this month Baku, Azerbaijan hosted a
little-noticed two-day conference of Council of Europe culture
ministers to discuss `Intercultural dialogue as the basis for peace
and sustainable development in Europe and its neighboring regions.’ In
his opening remarks to the attendees Azeri president Ilham Aliyev,
astonishingly claimed:

`Azerbaijan has rich history and the cultural monuments here are duly
preserved, and a lot is being done in this direction. The country
pursues independent policy. There is no serious discord in society and
the peoples unite around the idea of modernism and Azerbaijanism.’

The high point of the conference was the signing of the `Baku
Declaration for the Promotion of Intercultural Dialogue’ which is
`firmly based’ on the European Convention on Human Rights ¦ as well
as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the Vienna
Declaration and Plan (Programme) of Action, which bound the
participants to:

  affirm cultural diversity between and within countries as a
common heritage of humankind;

  agree to contribute to sustainable economic, social and personal
development, favourable to cultural creativity;

  promote a sustained process of intercultural dialogue, which is
essential for international co`operation, with a view to promoting
Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law;

  reaffirm the important role of cultural policies at national,
regional and local level and their contribution for promoting
intercultural dialogue;

  promote intercultural dialogue, including its religious
dimension, as a process that requires a coherent interplay between
different policy sectors and the full participation of the different
stakeholders ` including public authorities, the media and civil
society.

In all the `dialogue’ about `affirming,’ `promoting’ and
`reaffirming,’ it seems the topic of the destruction of the Jugha
cemetery never came up, and none of the attendees made the impolitic
observation that Azerbaijan had either violated the UNESCO World
Heritage Convention if its soldiers had perpetrated the reprehensible
act, or had violated the Valetta Convention by not protecting the
Armenian khachkars from destruction by `the real perpetrators,
whomever they may be.’

Just as the Armenian community in the U.S. is hopeful that an Obama
Administration will champion the Armenian Genocide Resolution, there
is reason to be optimistic that his foreign policy team will also have
a very different response to the ongoing stonewalling by the Azeris
than Rice’s utter disinterest, which is rooted in the Bush
administration’s pro- Azerbaijani, pro-Turkey foreign policy.

In addition to secretary of state nominee Hillary Clinton ` who led
the US delegation to a 1995 UN conference on women’s rights in Beijing
(`If there is one message that echoes forth from this conference, let
it be that human rights are women’s rights and women’s rights are
human rights, once and for all.’) ` prospective U.N. Ambassador Susan
Rice has a particular interest in genocide and is an advocate of
military action to stop mass killings rather than ineffective
`dialogue’ as slaughters continue apace. And Harvard professor
Samantha Power, author of `A Problem from Hell: America and the Age of
Genocide’ (2002), has been quietly advising Obama behind the scenes,
even after falling on her sword during the campaign after making a
comment about Hillary Clinton that caused a ruckus.

Given that past is prologue, with these women’s combined emphasis on
championing human rights and genocide prevention, it will not be easy
for the Obama administration to ignore or overlook the genocide that
preceeded – and encouraged – all others in the 20th and 21st
centuries, or the ongoing `cultural genocides’ in Azerbaijan and
Turkey against the archeological remains of a once-thriving,
centuries-old Armenian population that is no more.

One of The Stiletto’s favorite poems is Percy Bysshe Shelley’s
`Ozymandias’ ` her mother gave it to her to read and ponder in an
attempt to temper her teenage tendency towards hubris. The Stiletto
had always assumed that the ruination of those vast and trunkless legs
of stone and the shattered visage ` as well as the works of which the
ancient king had boasted in his epitaph – had occurred bit by bit from
centuries of erosion by wind-whipped particles of sand until nothing
remained except the boundless and bare desert for as far as the eye
could see. Contemplating Azerbaijan’s destruction of Jugha’s
irreplaceable khachkars, it now occurs to The Stiletto that Ozymandias
and his monuments could also have been consigned to oblivion by the
vengeful hand of man ` such a deliberate and purposeful obliteration,
that he and his people may as well never have existed in the annals of
human history.

BTW: To learn more about the Jugha cemetery and the Armenian cultural
heritage in Nakhichevan, Azerbaijan, check out the Djulfa Virtual
Memorial and Museum.

Photos and more links at

http://www.bloggernews.net/118982

BAKU: OSCE to hold monitoring on contact front line

Today.Az, Azerbaijan
Dec 13 2008

OSCE to hold monitoring on contact front line of Azerbaijani and
Armenian armed forces

13 December 2008 [12:30] – Today.Az

OSCE will hold a monitoring on the contact front line of Azerbaijani
and Armenian armed forces on the basis of the mandate of the personal
representative of the OSCE chairman-in-office, said the press service
for the Defense Ministry of Azerbaijan.

According to the press service, the monitoring will be held near
Ashaghy Veyselli village of Khojavend, Azerbaijan.

The Azerbaijani side will be represented by the field assistants of
the representative of the OSCE chairman Imre Palatinus, Irchi Aberle
and Vladimir Chountulov.

Azerbaijani lands, occupied by Armenia, will be represented by
personal representative of the OSCE chairman, ambassador Abzhey
Kasprshik and his field assistants Peter Key and Antal Herdich.

/Day.Az/

URL:

http://www.today.az/news/politics/49558.html

ANKARA: Turkey to open Armenian departments

Hürriyet, Turkey
Dec 13 2008

Turkey to open Armenian departments

ISTANBUL – In a move to contribute to Turkish-Armenian ties, Turkey’s
Higher Board of Education, or YÃ-K, will open Armenian language and
literature departments at Turkish universities, the Anatolia News
Agency reported Friday.

Trakya and NevÅ?ehir universities will accept a total of 40
students in the department. BoÄ?aziçi University has been
teaching Armenian language since last year.

Obama sets Middle East collision course

WorldNetDaily, OR
Dec 13 2008

Obama sets Middle East collision course
Position could alienate potential intermediary

Posted: December 13, 2008
12:20 am Eastern

© 2008 WorldNetDaily

Editor’s Note: The following report is excerpted from Joseph Farah’s
G2 Bulletin, the premium online newsletter published by the founder of
WND. Subscriptions are $99 a year or, for monthly trials, just $9.95
per month for credit card users, and provide instant access for the
complete reports.

The flag of Turkey

Even before he moves into the Oval Office, Barack Obama may be on a
collision course with a country that carries great weight in Middle
East negotiations, has considerable influence throughout Central Asia
and is close to Russia, according to a report from Joseph Farah’s G2
Bulletin.

That country is Turkey, which also has taken initiatives to mediate
indirect peace talks between Syria and Israel.

In recent weeks, Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan also has
offered to be a mediator between the incoming Obama administration and
Iran.

"We are the only capital that is trusted by both sides," Erdogan
said. "We are the ideal negotiator."

In addition, Turkey is in a strategic location as an energy corridor
for oil and natural gas pipelines from Azerbaijan to the West.

While Turkey appears to be a position to help with some of Obama’s
biggest upcoming foreign policy challenges, the relationship may be
off to a rocky start, because Obama has described as "genocide" the
deaths of up to 1.5 million Armenians in 1915 at the hands of the
Ottoman Empire.

In a May letter to the Armenian National Committee of America,
then-Sen. Barack Obama wrote, "I share your view that the United
States must recognize the events of 1915 to 1923, carried out by the
Ottoman Empire, as genocide. ¦We must recognize this tragic reality."

Keep in touch with the most important breaking news stories about
critical developments in the Middle East with Joseph Farah’s G2
Bulletin, the premium, online intelligence news source edited and
published by the founder of WND.

The Republic of Turkey, which succeeded the Ottoman Empire, does not
accept the word "genocide" to describe events at that time.

The issue isn’t new. In October 2007, Congress prepared to take a vote
on a resolution that would have officially recognized as genocide the
1915 event.

The Bush administration, however, opposed such a vote due to the
potential of damaging relations with Turkey, a NATO ally.

The Turkish government reacted strongly against the prospect of
passage of such a resolution.

It threatened to cut off critical supplie routes through Turkey for
the U.S. war effort in Iraq and Afghanistan. It also threatened to
close the strategic U.S. air base at Incirlik.

While the resolution would not have been binding on U.S. foreign
policy, it could have damaged an already seriously strained
relationship with Turkey.

E.view&pageId=83463

http://worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAG

BAKU: Spcial hearing on NK conflict held in Belgian Senate

State Telegraph Agency of the Republic of Azerbaijan
December 11, 2008 Thursday

SPECIAL HEARING ON NAGORNO-KARABAKH CONFLICT HELD IN BELGIAN SENATE

Baku 11 December

The World Azerbaijanis Congress (WAC) organized a special hearing on
the Nagorno-Karabakh in the Belgian Senate.

Addressing the Senate, WAC chairman Sabir Rustamkhanli spoke about
reasons and historical roots of Armenia-Azerbaijan, Nagorno-Karabakh
conflict, as well as genocides and terror acts committed by Armenians
against Azerbaijanis and Turks. Rustamkhanly said the international
community still remains indifferent to Armenian crimes. He pointed out
that WAC regularly hold events to raise world community`s awareness
about the fact that Armenia supports terrorism on a governmental
level.

Belgian MPs, politicians from Germany, Russia and Netherlands, as well
as representatives of Azerbaijan and Turkish communities were present
at the event.

Genocide and Original Sin

The Roanoke Times (Virginia)
December 11, 2008 Thursday
Metro Edition

GENOCIDE AND ORIGINAL SIN

EDITORIAL; John Long; Pg. B9

This week marks the 60th anniversary of a landmark piece of
international legislation: the United Nations Convention on the
Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. I wish I could say
the document had been as successful in preventing mass killings as the
authors intended it to be.

The preamble of the treaty describes genocide as an "odious scourge
. . . condemned by the civilized world." No argument on my end so
far. The convention further defines genocide as "acts committed with
intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial
or religious group." The killing of large numbers of individuals for
their indelible identity (race, religion, etc.) obviously qualifies,
as would such practices as forced sterilization or abortion designed
to eliminate a specific group. But left out of this definition are
other justifications for mass governmental murder, such as political
differences or economic distinctions.

I was thinking about the subject not long ago after attending a
lecture at Roanoke College on the subject of 20th century
genocides. Eric Weitz of the University of Minnesota was the speaker,
and he attempted to answer the question "Why was the 20th century the
century of genocides?" Indeed the last century was the most bloody on
record. Six million Jews (and millions of others) killed by Hitler’s
Holocaust; 800,000 deaths more recently in Rwanda; 2 million in 1970s
Cambodia; a million and a half forgotten Armenians in Turkey during
World War I. It’s a depressing litany of numbers that could go on for
pages.

Professor R.J. Rummel of Hawaii was perhaps more descriptive when he
coined the term "democide." He defined it simply as the killing of
humans by government. And by his count, government was one of the most
prolific killers of the last century. Let Rummel’s estimate sink in
for a bit: 262 million 20th century people killed by governments,
usually their own.

Dr. Weitz’s explanations for 20th century genocide ranged from the
modern conception of race to the rise of nationalism and imperialism
in the 19th century to the advances in biological science that helped
some justify the "inferiority" of another group. Weitz also pointed
out that genocide is not carried out solely by a few fanatics: Large
numbers of non-killers have to be complicit in such geno- (or demo-)
cide.

His remark reminded me of a quote by C.S. Lewis that the greatest evil
"is not done in concentration camps and labor camps. In those we see
its final result. But it is conceived and ordered (moved, seconded,
carried and minuted) in clean, carpeted, warmed and well-lighted
offices, by quiet men with white collars and cut fingernails and
smooth-shaven cheeks who do not need to raise their voice."

Overall, I thought Weitz did an admirable job of covering his topic in
a short address, but I left thinking there were other answers to the
question of the day. For instance, he did not touch on industrial
technology, which has made it so much more practical, affordable and
hygienic to massacre thousands of people.

But more frighteningly, it seems that one common denominator in every
one of the 262 million murders was overlooked: They were all
perpetrated by people. Humans, unmoored from any traditional sense of
right and wrong, killing other humans with soulless efficiency.

Perhaps the fatal flaw is not in expansive government, as Rummel
speculates, or in inequitable prejudices toward other groups, as Weitz
opined, or in the cold efficiency of modern bureaucrats, as Lewis’
quote suggests. Perhaps the flaw is in ourselves. Once upon a less
politically correct time it was called original sin. And if that’s the
case there’s not much hope of human institutions, inevitably afflicted
by the same flaw, fixing the problem.

Here we again see the wisdom of our Founding Fathers — though they
never heard the term genocide, they instinctively knew that power
should be divided, not concentrated in one potentially abusive
institution. Absolute power corrupts — and too often kills —
absolutely.

The U.N. Genocide Convention has been able to punish some genocidal
criminals, but has not been — perhaps cannot be — a preventative
measure. For that, I can only look toward the little baby whose birth
we’ll celebrate later this month.

Long, a Roanoke Times columnist, is director of the Salem Museum and
teaches history at Roanoke College.

Azeri, Armenian presidents could discuss Karabakh in early 2009

Interfax, Russia
Dec 12 2008

Azeri, Armenian presidents could discuss Karabakh at personal meeting
in early 2009

BAKU Dec 12

Another round of talks between the Azerbaijan and Armenian presidents
on the Karabakh problem could take place in early 2009, chief of
Foreign Relations at the Azeri presidential administration Novruz
Mamedov told journalists.

"It seems to me that the next presidential meeting might take place
early next year," Mamedov said.

The world community wants the Karabakh problem to be resolved within
Azerbaijan’s territorial integrity, he said.

"Overall, as a result of regional processes and the global community
becoming more active, Russia, Turkey, the United States, the European
Union and other international organizations – all of them are very
interested in getting this conflict resolved within Azerbaijan’s
territorial integrity, and Baku has strengthened its stance in this
direction," Mamedov said.

"This is why I think that the decision in this direction, made by each
international organization, must be a help for us," said the
presidential administration official.

As for Russia’s role in the conflict resolution, Moscow has not taken
the opposite stance, he said.

"I think, it is more important for Russia to see this conflict
resolved within Azerbaijan’s territorial integrity and in line with
international law," Mamedov said.

Azeri MP slams Minsk Group’s role in Karabakh settlement

Interfax, Russia
Dec 12 2008

Azeri MP slams Minsk Group’s role in Karabakh settlement

BAKU Dec 12

Azeri Parliament First Deputy Speaker Ziyafet Askerov has criticized
the Minsk Group’s assistance in the settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh
conflict, but he has called for further cooperation with the group.

"The Minsk Group has been active for many years. I regret the fact
that it has not been very productive," Askerov told journalists on
Friday.

"We have been told to take our own measures to find a common language
with Armenia, while they [the mediator-nations] can put forth only
suggestions. What do we need the Minsk Group for if we ourselves can
find a common language with Armenia?" he said.

The first deputy speaker, however, said he does not want the format of
the Minsk Group to be reviewed.

"We need to work with the Minsk Group. But I think that a categorical
demand requiring specific results should be set. If Armenia does not
leave the occupied territories and fails to honor the UN Security
Council’s four resolutions, the Minsk Group will have to step
in. Otherwise, we do not need it," he said.

Commenting on Turkey’s growing role in the Nagorno-Karabakh settlement
process, Askerov said that Azerbaijan will be grateful to any country
that is able to help resolve the problem.

The co-chairmen of the OSCE Minsk Group from the United States, Russia
and France have been acting as international brokers in negotiations
intended to help settle the conflict over Nagorno-Karabakh, a
predominantly Armenian enclave within Azerbaijan.