Recognition of The Genocide made public in the House Of Commons

Armenian Solidarity
contact: name: Eilian Williams
c/p The Temple of Peace, Cathays Park
Cardiff, Wales
Tel: 00 44 07876561398
Email: [email protected]

Armenian Solidarity with the
Victims of All Genocides
Nor Serount Cultural Association

Seyfo Centre

C.H.A.K.(Centre of Halabja)
c/o The Temple of Peace, Cathays Park, Cardiff, Wales

Tel:07718982732
[email protected]

PRESS RELEASE

A Recognition of the Armenian Genocide made public in the House Of Commons

The 60th anniversary of the UN Genocide convention was marked in the
House of Commons this week, on tuesday, 9th December, by a public
recognition of the Armenian Genocide by the Socialist Party of
Kurdistan (PSK). Participating in the event were Professor Khatchatur
Pilikian, author Desmond Fernandes, Akif Wan of the KNK and Adnan Kochar
of CHAK.

The PSK statement read :"Turkey has not confronted its history and
is adamant and stubborn in its behaviour. It is less than a century
since the Armenian Genocide happened in front of the eyes of the world.
This shameful act for humanity was condemned by the parliaments of many
countries. Each time the Turkish government and its parliament has
responded to these condemnations with anger. Excluding few conscientious
intellectuals, the so called intellectuals and artists of Turkey have
followed the footsteps of their politicians and tried to hide, deny,
even falsify history and are using every trick in the book to blame the
Armenians.

Of course, in Turkey, the example of a shameful act is not just the
Armenian Genocide, but what was done to the Assyrians, Greeks and Kurds
are crimes against humanity too. During the genocide of the Armenians,
the Assyrians got their share in this slaughter" (whole statement
below)

——————————– ——————————–

Author Desmond Fernandes described the way that Lemkin conceptualised
the term "genocide". The Armenian ‘genocide’ – which he recognised, as
such – had occured, he noted, without the perpetrators being brought to
justice. Lemkin’s conceptualisation of the term "genocide", and campaign
to make it an international crime (through an international initiative
that resulted in the United Nations’ Genocide Convention being passed
exactly 60 years ago), was aimed at trying to address these types of
concerns in a practical manner. Fernandes then outlined the way in which
Armenians, Chaldeans-Assyrians, Greeks, Kurds and "Others", have been
subjected to genocide – not only during the 1915-1918 period, but also
during the so-called ‘War of Independence’ and Turkish republican
period.

He provided case studies to highlight the nature of the genocides, and
detailed the manner in which Tove Skutnabb-Kangas, a renowned genocide
scholar, has reiterated the fact that Turkey still remains, in terms of
the nature of ill-treatment of Kurds, in breach of two articles of the
Genocide Convention. Kurds, as Tove Skutnabb-Kangas and others have
further shown, are also being subjected to ‘linguistic’ and ongoing
‘cultural genocide’. Concerning the nature of targeting of "minorities"
in Turkey, Fernandes outlined the manner in which Armenians, Kurds,
Assyrians, Greeks and "Others" continue to be subjected to cultural
genocide (just as "Greek Cypriots and ‘Christian’ Others" also continue
to be subjected to cultural genocide in the north of Cyprus).

‘Deep political’ and ‘deep state’ linked circles continue to adopt
ideological positions that are all too willing to engage and ‘profit
from’ genocidal actions. Recent statements by the Turkish Prime Minister
(4th November 2008) and Vecdi Gonul, the Defence Minister, have merely
encouraged those who advocate targeting of the ‘non-Turkish Other’.
Their positions, he noted, have been deeply criticised by the Society
for Threatened Peoples, the Socialist Party of Kurdistan (see attached
statement, in full), Arat Dink (the son of assassinated Hrant Dink),
amongst other human rights campaigners, parties and organisations.
Concerning the perspectives of two leading Kurdish parties over the
‘cultural genocide’ debate, he noted that Abdullah Ocalan was recently
(in September 2008) quoted as saying: "I am warning the people against
the cultural genocide and the dangers: I express my opinions". Murat
Karayilan has also been quoted (in Alternatif in September 2008) as
referring to the "cultural genocide policies" of the state. For the
Socialist Party of Kurdistan (PSK): "The genocide against the Kurds has
been ongoing since the time of the Ottoman Empire … We can say that,
all the things done to the Kurds, and at different times and places, …
are physical and cultural genocide. The system that started this policy
towards the end of the Ottoman Empire and that spread all through [the
Turkish] Republican period wanted to exterminate tens of millions of
Kurds through genocide, deportation and assimilation. Even if this has
not been fully achieved, [to date], such policies had a huge destructive
impact on the lives of the Kurdish people. Has the situation changed
today? No. Today, Turkish statesmen are neither brave enough to confront
their history nor to make real changes in their policies that are
suitable for our times. They are disregarding world public opinion and
international law and carrying on with their policies without fear.
Today the system is using the terror that it had created, carrying on
with its militarist and racist activities. It is resisting" initiatives
aimed at "opening a peaceful path for a solution".

——————————— ——————————-

Professor Khatchatur Pilikian in his major speech said:
"The literary genius John Milton, whose 400th anniversary of birth is
exactly today, but it will be marked tomorrow at the Library, Conway
Hall, once uttered this eye-opening remark in his Apology of 1648: "they
who have put out the people’s eyes, reproach them of their blindness."

Even in the first decade of our 21st century, the oppressors’
mantra has remained essentially the same: ‘if you don’t like to be
oppressed, then accept your fate. If not, you better leave your abode,
home and country. At best we will encourage such a move, and at worst we
will force you to leave’. In other words, you are not free to stay and
try to change the status quo of iniquity. If you choose the latter and
struggle for your human rights — enshrined in International Laws,
Covenants and Conventions, not only as an individual, but also as a
people, especially when diverse from the ruling and the oppressing class
— then individual terror or even murder might be your Damoclean sword.
Otherwise deportation and probably state terror leading to Genocide
might befall your ethnic community.

That is exactly why the eminent Turkish Armenian journalist Hrant
Dink was murdered in January last year. And that is what the recent
Prime Minister of the Turkish Republic, Recep Erdogan really meant, on
November 4, this year, when he warned the disenchanted citizens of the
Republic in general and the oppressed minorities in particular, saying:
"Turkey consists of one nation, one flag and one land and that anyone
who is not in agreement with this should leave the country". On November
10, 2008, less than a week after Erdogan’s warning, his Defence Minister
Vecdi Gönül, was in Brussels, marking the 70th anniversary of death
of Kemal Ataturk, the founder of the Turkish Republic. Gönül’s
eulogy of Ataturk contained these revealing words: "Would it be possible
today to maintain the same national State if the existence of Greeks in
the Aegean region and of Armenians in several regions of Turkey had
continued as before?"

Curiously enough, the recent Defence Minister of Turkey chose to
forget what Ataturk himself had thought about such state terror
accomplishments. The Turkish historian and sociologist Taner Akcam
informs: "Mustafa Kemal has dozens of speeches in which he defines the
treatments reserved to Armenians as "cowardice", or "barbarity", and
names these treatments "massacre". (See T. Akcam’s: The Geemnocide of
Armenians and the Silence of the Turks, From Empire to Republic, A
Shameful Act.)

"We all know of course that Raphael Lemkin, who first coined the term
"genocide" in 1943, did not mince his words, stating that genocide
"happened so many times. First to the Armenians, then after the
Armenians, Hitler took action." (Dadrian. History of the Armenian
Genocide, p. 350)

According to the Turkish Justice Ministry, 1,700 people were tried
in 2006 alone, under the racist Article 301 of the Turkish Penal Code.
Prosecutors of the status quo have a field day in prohibiting so-called
"insulting Turkishness", utilizing Article 301 to silence those valiant
intellectuals who dare challenge the false premises of the official
state denials of historical truths related with the Empire’s and the
Republic’s tragic acts of ethnic and cultural annihilations. Hrant Dink
himself was victimised by Article 301, before his assassination. Not
surprisingly, therefore, that the eminent Turkish civil rights
campaigner and publisher Ragip Zarakolu was found guilty of "insulting
the institutions of the Turkish Republic". Just recently the BBC
announced that a Turkish court has sentenced a Kurdish politician, the
European Parliament’s Sakharov human rights 1995 award winner,
47-year-old Ms Leyla Zana, to 10 years in prison. That is what the
racist Article 301 of Turkey’s penal code is all about-annihilating
dissent and multiculturalism.

It is indeed refreshing to note that all the major Universal
Declarations, International Charters and Conventions are not in
agreement with the monolithic and rabid nationalism of the past and the
present Turkish ruling elite, the like of Erdogan and Gönül,
mentioned above"………

….." Here again Raphael Lemkin’s thoughtful contribution is welcome:
"I understood that the function of memory is not only to register past
events, but to stimulate human conscience [.] It became clear to me that
the diversity of nations, religious groups and races is essential to
civilization because every one of those groups has a mission to fulfill
and a contribution to make in terms of culture."

All the above notwithstanding, UNESCO has been warning the world,
for decades now, that the greatest shame of the current civilisation is
the fact that thousands of children die of hunger every single day.
Today that number has reached the staggering 44,000 hungry children
dying each day of the year, as if a Hiroshima bomb is unleashed every
single day just to kill children. I would like to pose the following:
that the Goebbels’ of this world, "releasing the safety-catch of their
pistols"-in modern parlance cluster bombs & co, ill-Ltd –should also be
seen responsible for the modern massacres of the innocents. Can there be
any doubt that this child cleansing is also the unmentioned genocide of
humanity, ongoing and an authentic one at that, which surely is the
outcome of our own socio-economic and industrial military system, now
coined with cynical panache as Globalisation, whereby tens of thousands
of nuclear warheads, each averaging at least 20 times the destructive
power of a Hiroshima bomb, are already in deployment all around the
world.

Meanwhile billions pour into the pockets of the warmongers of
modern metropolises. These warlords of Mammon would eventually thrive in
an ‘Inorganic Paradise’-a ‘paradise’ void of universal human rights and
sustained by legalised torture; glorification of violence geared towards
maximising profit at any cost; xenophobic state terror protected with
religious fervour. And, topping as if the macabre orgy, genocide has
been already tested, for a century now, to become the collateral damage
of its inorganically modernised and sweat-shopped ‘global village’ of
hunger and debt."

————————————- —————————

Akif Wan of the Kurdish National Congress (KNK) spoke about present
human rights abuses in Turkey, particularly about the 10-year sentence
inflicted on Leyla Zana, the former MP.
Adnan Kochar , director of CHAK spoke about the ecoside inflicted on the
countryside of Kurdistan by the Turkish military.

During the questions,Lord Hylton said that the recent comments by the
Turkish ministers seemed to disqualify Turkey from progressing towards
EU membership. Andrew Pelling MP also participated and expressed his
great interest in the issues.

—————————————– ———————–

PRESS STATEMENT BY THE SOCIALIST PARTY OF KURDISTAN (PSK).
English translation from the Turkish original.

THE ON-GOING PHYSICAL AND CULTURAL GENOCIDE

The rulers of Turkey are unaware of what century and what kind of world
they live in as once again the latest developments have showed. As if
they are behind times for a hundred years or even more. As if they are
unaware of international law and the development of goodwill between
different languages , cultures that became common value of humanity
within the past century. Germany apologised to the Jews and the world
public opinion about the genocide of the Jews. To make sure that it is
not forgotten, genocide monuments erected in Germany and the concrete
evidence of this tragedy, ensures that concentration camps are protected
and open to the public. Putting it another way, Germany has confronted
its history. Australia has apologised for what was done to its
indigenous population, Aborigines, they too confronted their history.

It may not be on the same scale but in our world, no civilised country’s
intellectuals, rulers are trying to cover-up, deny or defend the
genocides against other people which are shameful events in their
history. But in Turkey everything is the opposite of this. Turkey has
not confronted its history and is adamant and stubborn in its behaviour.
It is less than a century since the Armenian Genocide happened in front
of the eyes of the world. This shameful act for humanity was condemned
by the parliaments of many countries. Each time the Turkish government
and its parliament has responded to these condemnations with anger.
Excluding few conscientious intellectuals, the so called intellectuals
and artists of Turkey have followed the footsteps of their politicians
and tried to hide, deny, even falsify history and are using every trick
in the book to blame the Armenians.
Of course, in Turkey, the example of a shameful act is not just the
Armenian Genocide, but what was done to the Assyrians, Greeks and Kurds
are crimes against humanity too. During the genocide of the Armenians,
the Assyrians got their share in this slaughter. In the following years,
that means before the Greek and Turkish governments exchanged
populations, the Greeks who were oppressed and threatened were deported
from Anatolia in their hundreds of thousands . One of the leading
figures carrying out such activities was CELAL BAYAR who was nicknamed
‘GALIP HOCA’ and was from the CUP (Committee for Union and Progress
Party).1 After the war and the exchange of the populations, some Greeks
were allowed to stay in Istanbul because some Turks stayed in Western
Thrace. [But] most of these Greeks left Istanbul as a result of
oppression and the events of 6/7 September which were organised by the
state.

The genocide against the Kurds has been ongoing since the time of the
Ottoman Empire. Marshal Moltke’s memoirs are full of such stories.
During the First World War, alongside the genocide of the Armenians,
700,000 Kurds from Kurdistan were exiled, and deported to central and
western Anatolia. This was an ethnic cleansing and many of these people
died as a result of hunger and cold.

After the war, in order to Turkify Anatolia and to establish a unitary
state, the second biggest population group, the Kurds, were declared as
non-existent. The state was established according to only Turkish
elements. Kurdish history, language and culture was banned. The Kurdish
peoples just reaction to all this was brutally and bloodily suppressed.
After each uprising was put down, the civilian population of the region,
without any discrimination – [including] women, children, young and old
– were subjected to genocide. For example, after the Sheikh Said
rebellion, they killed 20,000 civilians. After the Agri uprising, in
Zilan Stream region, a population of more than 30 villages was
exterminated. After the 1938 Dersim uprising, 60,000 people,
disregarding [the fact that many were] women and children, were
bayonetted, shot, herded en masse into the mills and burnt or were
killed in caves.

The journalist AYSE HUR recently reported on an interview that had taken
place in 1986 with the ex-Foreign Minister of Turkey, IHSAN SABRI
CAGLAYANGIL. [He said]: "The Dersimis [i.e. Kurds in the region] had
taken refuge in the caves. The (Turkish) army used poison gas. Through
the caves entrance … they were poisoned like rats. Aged from 7 to 70,
. the Kurds in Dersim were slaughtered . The [military] operation was
bloody. The Dersim case was finished. The government’s authority was
established in the villages and in Dersim … Today, anyone can go to
Dersim. Gendarma can go, so can you. But lately, especially in the
borders region, the Kurds influenced by the external powers started an
independence movement. Some Kurds live in Turkey, some in Iran…."
(AYSE HUR, 16/11/2008 TARAF GAZETESI).

After these uprisings and many smaller ones, the masses were exiled. By
doing
so they wanted to clear out the Kurds from the region. The appearance of
the PKK and its armed struggle was used as a pretext to evacuate and
demolish more than 4,000 villages and towns. 3-4 million [Kurdish]
people were exiled from their homeland as thousands of ‘unsolved
murders’ of Kurdish intellectuals and patriots occurred that took the
form of full massacre. These are the end result of policies that have
been implemented over the past 30 years.

The oppression and bans continued along with forced assimilation and
Turkification policies. They wanted to wipe out the language, culture –
in short, the very existence of the people who lived on their land for
thousands of years, who had deep roots and contributed to the
civilisation of Anatolia, Iran and Mesopotomia, who had their own
distinct and rich
history and language.

In conclusion, we can say that, all the things done to the Kurds, and at
different times and places, were beyond ethnic cleansing and they are
physical and cultural genocide. The system that started this policy
towards the end of Ottoman Empire and that spread all through [the
Turkish] Republican period wanted to exterminate tens of millions of
Kurds through genocide, deportation and assimilation. Even if this has
not been fully achieved [to date], such policies had a huge destructive
impact on the lives of the Kurdish people.

Has the situation changed today? No. Today, Turkish statesmen are
neither brave enough to confront their history nor to make real changes
in their policies that are suitable for our times. They are disregarding
world public opinion and international law and carrying on with their
policies without fear. Today the system is using the terror that it had
created, carrying on with its militarist and racist activities. It is
resisting [initiatives aimed at] opening a peaceful path for a
solution. They are not allowing [Kurdish] exiles to return to their
land. The ban on language and culture is on going. Even today, there is
no freedom of expression and organisation for the Kurds. The
intellectuals who support them are punished according to the laws such
as Turkish Penal Code article 301 and by similar articles.

The Turkish Prime Minister, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, recently visited the
Kurdish region and had this to say to the people who asked for cultural
and political rights:
"…The ones who don’t accept the idea of one state, one nation, one
flag, should leave the country …".

In fact, this is an infamous slogan of fascism: "love it or leave it
..".

On 10/11/2008 (The anniversary of Ataturk’s death on10/11/1938), the
Defense Minister, Mr.VECDI GONUL, who was in Brussels for a meeting,
openly claimed that without the genocide of the Armenians and the
deportation of the Greeks, there would have been no national state.
These are Vecdi Gonul’s exact words:

"…The most important step during the establishment of the nation was
exchange of the populations. Just think, would it have been possible for
us to become a nation state, if the Greeks had continued to live in
Aegean region and the Armenians in many parts of Anatolia?"

The Defence Minister, Mr. V.Gonul went on with an example from Ankara:
"… Just one district of Ankara were Muslims in those days ." and added
that another one [was] Greek and another one Armenian. He also stated
that, at the time, Izmir Trade Organisation was made up of non-Muslims.
Mr. Gonul is admitting that with genocide and deportations, Turkey was
ethnically cleansed, the finances were gained by Muslim Turks, and by
doing so, the nation state was set up and what is more, he defended
such action.

Honestly, there are no Greek or Armenian districts, Greeks or Armenians
left in Ankara. Such Greek or Armenian districts don’t exist in Istanbul
either. Despite all that the ones who stayed behind and how they feel is
not a secret. The events that took place in Malatya and murder of HRANT
DINK with the knowledge and support of the police and gendarme
authorities are still fresh in our minds.

Today, the extermination of the Kurds, and the physical and cultural
genocidal policies that are implemented against the Kurds are a
continuation of that "NATION BUILDING" mentality. It is obvious that the
Turkish statesmen believe that they have not completed the task yet ….

1 Celal Bayar was Prime Minister of Turkey in 1937 & later President in
1950.

MCA Governing Council met at the Office of Govm’t, presided by GC

The Governing Council of Millenium Challenge Account-Armenia SNCO met
at the Office of Government, presided at by GC Chairman, RA Prime
Minister Tigran Sargsyan.

n_centre_8/official_news_en.php?&date=12288528 00

Wednesday, 10th of December, 2008

The Governing Council of Millenium Challenge Account-Armenia SNCO met
at the Office of Government, presided at by GC Chairman, RA Prime
Minister Tigran Sargsyan.

The Council discussed and approved a package consisting of the request
for a tenth disbursement and attached documents, inclusive of the
annual report, summary quarterly report, performance monitoring chart,
disbursement pre-conditions, procurement reports, procurement and
working plans. It was noted that under the mentioned request, the
MCA-Armenia expects to be allocated USD 6,811,305 next quarter
(January-March, 2009) through the general financing system. Quarterly
expenditure will rise to USD 7,109,153.

According to the MCA-Armenia SNCO Chief Executive Director, the
requested funds will cover the following program activities: Rural Road
Rehabilitation, Irrigated Agriculture, Monitoring and Evaluation,
Program Administration and Monitoring. Ara Hovsepyan also mentioned
that thanks to the funds available from the government, the cost of
building activities will rise to USD 11,669,871 (without VAT) by the
end of this quarter, with the actual and projected spending for the
month of December totaling to USD 28,081,321.

In particular, the following activities were carried out in the period
under review: under the Rural Road Rehabilitation Activity, the repairs
of a 24.5km-long road section in the western part of Armenia are
nearing completion. Work is underway under the first-package contracts,
including the rehabilitation of a 273km-long road section to a total
cost of USD 60.3 million. Under the Irrigated Agriculture Activity, 4
tertiary canals have been built in 4 rural settlements. It was noted
that by the end of this year, there will be finalized design packages
for 6 water-mains, 7 gravity systems and 18 pump-stations to be built
in all marzes of the Republic next year. Over 18.000 program
beneficiaries have so far been taught on the subject of
intra-organizational water management and high-value output under the
From Water-to-Market component of the Irrigated Agriculture Activity.
Under the same program, 128 pilot farms have been created and over 130
agricultural loans have been extended to total sum of USD 1.5 million.

Once approved by the GC Chairman, the request package will be sent off
to the MCC for consideration.
The meeting similarly discussed and endorsed the draft contract on
Rehabilitation of Six Water-Mains (Package No.1) under the
Infrastructure component of the Irrigated Agriculture Activity.

The council was briefed on the targets of the 2nd stage of the loan
component of the From Water-to-Markey Activity of the Irrigated
Agriculture Project. Then, the meeting discussed the operational
guidelines entitled "Administrative Policy and Procedures for Lending
Program."

In conclusion, the council members were presented reference notes on
the approaches and technologies used in engineering water-mains and
tertiary canals, the audits and other checks of MCA-Armenia SNCO’s
financial and program activities etc.

http://www.gov.am/enversion/informatio

Examination For The Government

EXAMINATION FOR THE GOVERNMENT
KAREN NAHAPETYAN

Hayots Ashkharh Daily
12 Dec 2008
Armenia

Head of the Armenian Office of the World Bank Aristomene Varudakis
informed recently that the Armenian government, in cooperation with the
World Bank, is elaborating a project to confront world financial
economic crisis.

`We are working on two principle goals,’ he said and added that they
are making efforts to improve the indexes of the credits allocated to
the small and average business. For the second direction they preview
to elaborate the project of public investments. In this framework they
will show assistance particularly to the spheres of transport
communication, energy and water supply.

The elaboration of the anti-crisis project must naturally be a matter
of concern for any government but is it right to pin our hopes only on
the investments made by the foreign organizations.

Lets start from the fact that without the restriction of corruption it
is impossible to implement any anti-crisis project. Because it will
lead to robbery and corruption.

That is why what we really need is to:

a) Hold demonstrative anti-corruption court proceedings to scare them.

b) To define legally and to practice a clause according to which the
bribe-giver is freed from liability on condition that the latter
cooperates with the investigative body.

c) To hold similar activity like the American `Sheikh=E
2: to propose
bribes in huge amounts to the employees of the state apparatus and
deprive them of the right to work in the state service, for life.

It is evident that in conditions of the crisis it is very important to
ensure social stability. For which we need:

a) To ensure the minimum consumer basket of each citizen.

b) To struggle against the reasons of the inflation, aimed at stopping
the latter. To control the activity of the oligarchs and to raise the
fines for artificial inflation.

In case of the sharp fluctuation of prices the corresponding state
structures must have the right to firstly bring them to the previous
level and only after that to conduct investigation, because it will
take months.

g) To make corrections in the budget of 2009 taking into account the
possible influence of the world financial-economic crisis. To define
minimum level of state expenses.

It is appropriate in the real sector of the economy:

a) To separate the enterprises of strategic and social importance and
to pursue special policy towards them. For example to close the
`cashbox cracks’, to be able to allocate short-term credits for them.
In case they face serious financial problems to show financial
assistance, with strict control.

b) To establish an agency of Economic Reconstruction, which will
control the assistance shown to the non-financial sector and the whole
state property for the20realization of the strategic issue of the
country’s development.

c) To solve the issue of funding the investment projects by the state,
which is indispensable for the country’s development, but can’t be
realized by the private business.

Naturally all the before mentioned is the insignificant part of the
measures that the state should take to mitigate the possible influence
of the crisis on our country. But one thing is clear all the actions
should be well balanced. As Lenin used to say, we must find the circle
from where we can pull the whole chain.

We all know what was the Great Depression of the end of the 20’s and
the beginning of 30’s like. It is difficult to say but this is only the
beginning. The only similarity of the two crises is that they were both
of global character, which started from banking sector and credit
policy. They learned lessons from the Great Depression, which gave
possibility to the world to overcome the difficult moments in economy,
without disastrous crisis. That experience will be very helpful for
this moment.

As regards the citizens, the first thing they must do is not to yield
to panic. They should avoid taking expensive credits. They shouldn’t
invest money to purchase apartments and cars. It is high time to save
money.

Some people will face reduction of salaries or even unemployment. But
this doesn’t mean the end
of the world. At present Armenia has got
rather good chances to overcome the crisis, but everything depends on
the policy of the authorities.

The future will show to what extent our government is professional.

Political Prisoners Never Resort to Violence

POLITICAL PRISONERS NEVER RESORT TO VIOLENCE
GEVORG HAROUTYUNYAN

Hayots Ashkharh Daily
12 Dec 2008
Armenia

Interview with NP RAZMIK ZOHRABYAN, Vice Chair of the Republican Party
and a political prisoner of the Soviet times

`Mr. Zohrabyan, why are the radical leaders roused by the fact that the
President of the country granted an amnesty to three individuals
convicted for the March 1 disorders, based on the requests they had
submitted.’

`I definitely welcome the fact that President Serge Sargsyan
demonstrated good will. The President of the country has granted an
amnesty to those participants of the `March 1′ events who admit the
fact of their having committed a crime and at the same time, do not
give up the idea of protecting their political beliefs and continuing
the struggle.

Undoubtedly, the individuals who were granted an amnesty committed
offences punishable under the Criminal Code, and their guilt was
confirmed by the court. I attach much importance to the fact that the
President of the country expressed willingness to continue exercising
his constitutional right of granting amnesties. I am convinced that the
request-appeals of all the convicts will be studied one by one, and the
series of amnesties may continue.

It is obvious that many of the participants of the `March 1′ disorders
were deluded. For some reason, they found themselves in the
atmosphere
of protest rallies and resorted to illegal acts in the existing tense
situation. Their deeds had social causes; these are criminal offences
which, however, do not have a political pretext.

The radicals realize this very well, and they know perfectly well that
to date, not all the active participants, organizers or leaders of the
post-electoral developments have been detained. Some of them have taken
to flight; they resort to any method to hide from or avoid justice. The
strange thing is that these people call on the individuals who were
imprisoned because of them and instead of them not to write requests
and continue `their struggle’ in the places of detention.’

`What if all the detainees were granted a pardon together? Wouldn’t
that be more proper?’

`Let’s keep in mind that the radical opposition had plans to stage a
coup d’état or a revolution. They themselves confirm that fact in their
public speeches. And that’s a crime against the constitutional order of
the country. The law-enforcement system is capable of preventing this
attempt of staging a coup d’état; that’s why, at least the organizers
and chief participants of such disorders should be held criminally
liable.

But I don’t think this should apply to many of those detained at
present, because they are less guilty than the real organizers and they
do deserve an20amnesty.’

`Can the individuals detained within the frameworks of the `March 1′
case be considered `political prisoners’?’

`No, because apart from expressing their political views they also
resorted to violence and committed offences. And they were convicted
for that. A political prisoner can be the one who led an exclusively
political struggle and did not resort to violence or any other illegal
act.

The entire democratic world is guided by this principle. Any political
figure committing robbery, murder or an act of violence in Europe, the
United States, China and any other country is definitely convicted.

In the Soviet Union, I wasn’t convicted for my political views; I was
convicted for concrete actions, particularly, for printing and
disseminating anti-Soviet leaflets and burning Lenin’s picture on the
square. I also made appeals for proclaiming Armenia’s independence from
the USSR, but I didn’t resort to violence. However, it is impossible
for any Government not to condemn those who built barricades and showed
resistance to the government with stones, iron sticks and arms in an
attempt to seize power. Neither can they be granted amnesty if they
haven’t admitted their guilt and haven’t repented.

Whereas, an amnesty applies to all the individuals who committed the
same crime, without consideration of the circumstances, personal
characters an
d motives. How can the state pardon those who wanted to
dismantle the state-government system, the Army and the law enforcement
bodies and seize power?

If we forgive revanchism today, it may acquire a more organized nature
tomorrow. After all, revanchists funded by foreign forces pursue a goal
to provoke a civil war and bring harm to the independence and statehood
of the Republic of Armenia and Artsakh.’

Turkey Makes Soft Landing

TURKEY MAKES SOFT LANDING
LILIT POGHOSYAN

Hayots Ashkharh Daily
12 Dec 2008
Armenia

In a press-conference held in `Hayatsk’ (view) club, KHOSROV
HAROUTYUNYAN, leader of the Armenian Christian-Democratic Party,
yesterday presented his views on the possible developments in the
Karabakh settlement process.

Below we present Mr. Harouyunyan’s comments in response to the
questions of `Hayots Ashkharh’.

`I have always spoken in favor of the normalization of the
Armenian-Turkish relations and first of all – the opening of the
border. I am sure that the opening of the border, along with other
political issues, creates pre-requisites for the fair solution of the
Karabakh issue. As long as the Armenian-Turkish border is close, there
will always be a good breeding ground for the bellicose ambitions of
Azerbaijan. This is the first thing to say.

The second thing is that if Turkey really wants to become an
influential state in the region, it cannot but normalize its relations
with Armenia. In view of the blockade and isolation of Armenia, they
cannot possibly pretend to that mission. Hence, Turkey is doomed to
regulating its relations with Armenia. Furthermore, it will do that not
just for meeting Armenia half-way. That step is first of all needed for
Turkey itself.

Third, let’s agree that very serious developments are observed in
Turkey’s public life20in terms of the relationship with Armenia and the
recognition of Genocide. It’s difficult to guess whether a couple of
meetings will be enough for solving those problems. Definitely they
will not be solved. However, the fact that the Turkish society is
becoming more receptive to issues concerning the Genocide and is more
inclined to relieve itself of the historical burden is beyond dispute.
This is a fact, and our task is to contribute to the process. That’s
all we are required to do.’

The Rest Is Lyrics

THE REST IS LYRICS

Hayots Ashkharh Daily
12 Dec 2008
Armenia

`By Armenia’s initiative a document devoted to the 60th anniversary of
the Genocide has been passed during the Session of the Council of OSCE
Foreign Ministers, in Helsinki. The representatives of Turkey showed
terrible resistance and great efforts were required from the diplomatic
corpus to pass that document. This is a very important precedent and a
serious achievement. Let alone the fact that the announcement made by
the Foreign Ministers of the Co-Chair countries emphasized the
importance of the peaceful settlement of Karabakh conflict,’ Khosrov
Harutyunyan believes.

Without Any Coquetry

WITHOUT ANY COQUETRY

Hayots Ashkharh Daily
12 Dec 2008
Armenia

`In my view it is high time for the Armenian authorities to voice,
without any coquetry, that by enormous armaments, that surpasses all
the quotes envisaged by the Treaty on the Ordinary Armaments in Europe,
Azerbaijan is a real threat not only for Karabakh but also the
stability of the whole region. All those countries that supply arms to
Azerbaijan must realize that they commit themselves to the
responsibility of the destabilization in the region,’ Khosrov
Harutyunyan believes.

NKR President Received Head of The Constitutional Court

NKR PRESIDENT RECEIVED HEAD OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT

Azat Artsakh Daily
12 Dec 08
Republic of Nagorno Karabakh [NKR

On 9 December NKR President Bako Sahakyan received head of the
Constitutional Court of the Republic of Armenia Gagik Haroutyunyan.
Issue related to enlarging cooperation between the Constitutional Court
of the Republic of Armenia and the Supreme Court of the Nagorno
Karabagh Republic, increasing effectiveness of the work of judicial
bodies as well as the course of legal were discussed at the meeting.
Head of the Office of the NKR President, secretary of the Security
Council Marat Mousayelyan and chairman of the NKR Supreme Court Ararat
Danielyan partook at the meeting.

Iran can use its potential for Karabakh conflict resolution

PanARMENIAN.Net

Iran can use its potential for Karabakh conflict resolution
13.12.2008 12:37 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Iran made Azerbaijan some proposals on resolution of
the Nagorno Karabakh issue, Iran’s Ambassador to Baku said.

"Azerbaijan and Armenia are applying efforts to resolve the
conflict. Iran can also use its potential," Nasir Hamidi Zare said.

Commenting on Iran’s interest in the Caucasus stability and
cooperation platform, the Ambassador remarked that the world is tired
of the Marxist and capitalistic systems. "It’s time to form a new and
fair structure," he said, the Azeri Press Agency reports.

Tigran Sargsyan: Armenia and Diaspora form a stronger state

PanARMENIAN.Net

Tigran Sargsyan: Armenia and Diaspora form a stronger state
13.12.2008 14:06 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ ‘The 1946-1948 Repatriation and its Lessons: The
Issue of Repatriation Today’ international conference kicked off in
Yerevan today on initiative of the Armenian Ministry of Diaspora
Affairs and the National Academy of Sciences.

The opening ceremony was attended by Prime Minister Tigran Sargsyan,
Minister of Diaspora Affairs Hranush Hakobian, MPs and other
officials.

"We have organized this conference to work out a special repatriation
program, taking into consideration the mistakes made in 1946-48,"
Minister Hakobian said. "The Armenians who are preparing to return to
homeland should know what they will do here and what kind of problems
they can face. "

For his part, Prime Minister Sargsyan said, "Armenia together with
Diaspora is quite another country. Our Diaspora is not so far from us,
as it was during the Soviet era. Today it’s an inseparable part of our
life."