Extremist group members seized in Petersburg

ITAR-TASS, Russia
March 23 2007

Extremist group members seized in Petersburg

23.03.2007, 18.44

ST. PETERSBURG, March 23 (Itar-Tass) — Members of two extremist
groups have been seized in St. Petersburg on suspicion of serious
crimes, including the explosion at a McDonalds fast food restaurant,
city prosecutor Sergei Zaitsev said on Friday.

They are suspected of attacks on citizens of Moldova and Cameroon in
the St. Petersburg metro this February, the explosion of a flower
kiosk near the Vladimirskaya metro station, the February 18 explosion
at McDonalds, and attacks on an Armenian citizen and two citizens of
Uzbekistan in Pushkin.

Ten residents of St. Petersburg and the Leningrad region aged from 17
through 23 were charged with the brawl in Pushkin.

The majority of suspects have nationalist views, Zaitsev said, adding
that they were taking part in actions organized by the Movement
against Illegal Migration. Extremist symbols and booklets, as well as
video recordings of attacks on foreigners were seized from the
suspects. Three of them took part in the attack on the Moldovan woman
and the Cameroon citizen.

There are five suspects in the McDonalds case, and three of them are
taken into custody. TNT and bomb parts were seized from them.

Experts confirmed the identity of bombs used at McDonalds and near
the Vladimirskaya metro station. The police said that the detentions
prevented no less than two explosions.

The February 18 explosion at McDonalds will be defined as `terrorism’
instead of `attempted murder’, Zaitsev said.

`The perpetrators wanted not only to breach the order but also to
intimidate the authorities,’ he said.

Six people were hurt in the explosion of a handmade caseless bomb
equivalent to 150 grams TNT and staffed with nuts.

TBILISI: Lavrov: Kosovo is a precedent…sort of

The Messenger, Georgia
March 23 2007

Lavrov: Kosovo is a precedent…sort of

By Ekaterina Basilaia

Despite the fact that the de facto authorities of Abkhazia, South
Ossetia and Transdnistria say that they have more "moral, legal and
historical" grounds to independence than Kosovo, Russia’s Foreign
Minster Sergey Lavrov stated that Kosovo is not the model for these
breakaway regions, and that if the Serbian province is granted
independence it does not mean these self declared republics will
follow.

"We admit that any decision made about Kosovo’s status will set a
precedent. For the first time, independence will be gained not by
being a component of a former union-member state, as with the case of
Czechoslovakia and the Soviet Union [but by a former autonomous
region]," Lavrov stated at the government hour at the Russian State
Duma on March 21, Interfax news agency reported.

"But projection of this situation in respect to Abkhazia, South
Ossetia and Transdnistria will not be a correct step. I repeat there
is no connection. We are not waiting impatiently for Kosovo to be
separated from Serbia so that we will do the same in regard with
these republics. This is not true and this would be an erroneous
position," he added.

Nevertheless, Lavrov went to say that Russia will look after its
citizens in Abkhazia and South Ossetia, where most residents hold
Russia passports.

"We are ready to develop all kinds of contacts with these republics.
The people who live there are our citizens. We are responsible for
their social problems because nobody, except us, has been able to do
this so far," he stressed.

Talking about Georgian-Russian relations, Lavrov noted that "Georgia
and Georgia’s leadership are two totally different things."

"The Georgian authorities fail to reflect the mood dominating
Georgian society," Interfax news agency quoted Lavrov as saying.

The Duma’s Deputy Speaker Sergey Baburin said he was satisfied with
Lavrov’s speech, noting that for the first time the foreign minister
of Russia has referred to the territories concerned, not as regions,
but as republics, and spoke about cooperating with these republics on
an official level, directly from the State Duma.

Chair of the Duma committee for CIS affairs Andrey Kokoshin also
expressed his satisfaction with Lavrov’s speech.

"I think that as far as Abkhazia and South Ossetia are concerned, it
is extremely important for us now that a fundamental agreement be
reached between Tskhinvali and Sukhumi on the one hand and Tbilisi on
the other," Kokoshin stated.

The Duma has been intensively pushing for the official recognition of
Georgia’s two breakaway regions of Abkhazia and South Ossetia for a
long time. Last December, with not a vote against, the Duma passed
two statements regarding the two breakaway regions calling for the
Russian government to officially recognise the territories as
independent. They based this call on the results of the ‘independence
referendum’ in South Ossetia and an appeal sent by the parliament of
Abkhazia.

Moscow officials also supported the recent elections in Abkhazia,
saying they "respect" the polls in the region, even though the EU,
NATO, OSCE and UN condemned them.

Meanwhile, the de facto authorities of breakaway Abkhazia and South
Ossetia are demanding Russia "take immediate and decisive steps" to
recognise them, fearing that Georgia’s accession to NATO might
forever thwart their independence aspirations.

"Russia now has a unique and perhaps final chance to preserve its
influence in the South Caucasus – by recognizing Abkhazia and South
Ossetia," de facto Abkhaz foreign minister Sergey Shamba said in an
interview with Russian daily Moskovskiy Komsomolets on March 20.

"Moscow should use the Kosovo precedent and make a decisive step now
because later on
Kosovo’s example will lose its significance. Georgia and Azerbaijan
will become NATO members, Armenia will take after them forcefully and
Russia will loose its control over the region," Shamba added.

"It is time for Russia to take a firm position," de facto South
Ossetian president Eduard Kokoity told Moskovskiy Komsomolets.

TBILISI: Heads should roll

The Messenger, Georgia
March 23 2007

Heads should roll

Having banged on for over a year about how the final status of Kosovo
would set an inevitable, unavoidable precedent for Georgia’s
breakaway regions of Abkhazia and South Ossetia, the Russian elite
have now decided that it won’t after all. Russian Foreign Minister
Sergey Lavrov, appearing before the Duma, was asked about the issue,
and the mealy mouth semi-reply he gave (he didn’t even get round to
finishing, he was saved by the bell and the session ended) is ample
evidence of the totally short sighted, reactive, and frankly inept
policy Russia has in regards to Georgia.

"We emphasize that any decision about Kosovo will create a
precedent…But projection of this situation to, South Ossetia and
Transdnistria would not be appropriate. I repeat there is no link"
fumbled Lavrov.

What sort of precedent is it that doesn’t create a precedent? Lavrov
has created a precedent of his own by redefining the very word, but
that is the least of his problems re Georgia. The fact is that
Russian foreign policy has totally failed. Everything they have tried
has been totally wrong footed from the word go. Lavrov probably has
bigger fish to fry, it’s likely not his fault, but some people really
need to get fired.

The first to lose their job should be the person who came up with the
idea of blowing up the pipeline last January. As if Georgia, a
country that did without electricity, gas and virtually everything
else for much of the nineties, would suddenly crumble after few days
of wearing coats indoors. The plan was doomed to failure form the
start, whoever came up with clearly doesn’t possess an atlas, and
didn’t realise they’d be hurting Russia’s long suffering but loyal
ally Armenia in the process.

The wine ban man also needs a dressing down, all he managed to do was
make a world that usually doesn’t care feel sorry for plucky little
Georgia. But the person who really should never eat lunch in Moscow
again is the man that dreamt up the idea that Igor Giorgadze could
become president. They must have spent million on him. The offices in
the centre of all Georgia’s towns, one on Rustaveli, one on
Perovskaya and one on Chavchavadze, must have cost a pretty penny.
All the rallies, whose participants were paid between five and ten
lari, would have run up quite a tab too. And for what? To promote
probably the least popular man in Georgia as an alternative
president, it’s like putting Marshal Petain up for president of
France in 1945. Whoever came up with the idea is either barking mad
or a comedy genius.

And the really baffling thing is: they haven’t learnt their lesson.
Whatever apparatchik-on-acid came up with Giorgadze subsequently
pinned their hopes on Irina Sarishvili, possibly because she is as
crazy as they are.

Everything they do is totally counterproductive, but they are unable
to change their methods. Another prime example is the neutrality
issue. Russia really, really doesn’t want Georgia to join NATO, but
by calling for Georgia neutrality they only boosted the already
formidable support for NATO membership. Anyone could have told them
that would happen. How many boobs are the people who decide Georgia
policy allowed before they find themselves out of a job? Who are
these people, where do they work-the foreign ministry, the Kremlin,
la la land?

We should be told.

TBILISI: Rock the Kavkaz! Creating an artistic infrastructure

The Messenger, Georgia
March 23 2007

Rock the Kavkaz!
Creating an artistic infrastructure for the Caucasus

By Ekaterina Basilaia

Funk, acid house, electronic music, punk… if you can dance to it,
Georgian punk supreme Lado Burduli and German artist Micha Wiederhold
can give directions.

Sometimes fast and hard, sometimes soft and soulful music rings out
in Mtatsminda from the Art Café, usually heaving with music lovers
when Lado and Micha put on an event.

"We create an open space to bring people together, the rest they make
on their own," Micha said.

Micha and Lado are trying to build a dialogue among people, a network
involving musicians, artist, and anyone interested.

The pair organise events once a week with Georgian bands. They say
that the main is that these events must be regular to create a
lasting impact.

"We ask everybody, it is open for everyone. There are two things that
we want to achieve-we want to set up a meeting point for people where
they have opportunity for dialogue, and at the same time create a
place where people can bring something they have to discuss. We
provide the initial energy that makes people get in contact," Micha
added.

The organisers are seeking to establish an artistic infrastructure
all over the Caucasus. Last Saturday the stage was given to an
Armenian band ‘LSD Flying Tea’. This was the first time an Armenian
band had performed at the event. The organisers say they are planning
to bring more Armenian bands, bands from Azerbaijan, Abkhazia, South
Ossetia, Chechnya, and across the region, to their events. Their
Phoenix Caucasus project will take these bands not only to Tbilisi,
but to other Georgian, Armenian, Azeri, Abkhazian and South Ossetian
cities and towns.

"This is what we want to achieve in the end… bring understanding that
in turn will help bring peace."

Micha is dissatisfied that everything takes place in the capital
cities and nobody takes any notice of the provinces. This made them
organise one of their events in the small Georgian town of Samtredia.

"This does not usually happen there, and what I noticed is-they loved
it, it was so nice," Micha says.

The arrangements are done through their website
where the bands interested make proposals,
and Lado and Micha sort out the rest.

Among the many different angles that Phoenix Caucasus aims to
promote, popularisation of contemporary art plays the key
role-contemporary art of all genres. Hence the bands they want to
attract are not established bands, or the multitude of competent
cover bands, knocking out Pretty Woman night after night. They target
those that are starting out, coming up with new and fresh ideas.

"Mostly the people making this kind of music are young people, who
are in most cases not professionals. For these kinds of musicians
there is not a stage, and we give them the opportunity to perform. We
look for potential. We do not invite cover bands," the organisers
say.

Musicians taking part in the events can join in their partner project
‘CaucasusROCKS’, through which bands from across the Caucasus are
being promoted via the internet, compilation and live concert CDs,
after all, "If you don’t offer anything, nobody will be interested."

After the years of crisis that Georgia had to undergo, Lado and Micha
worry that people have started to forget about art and, at a certain
point, even stopped creating anything new.

"Art is not luxury, it is not something that needs money. It opens
minds to different things and brings you one step further. Maybe
someone is against some piece of art or not, it doesn’t matter. If
you give them something, that’s what’s important," Micha says.

Therefore they named their project Phoenix Caucasus. The Phoenix, the
mythical bird that dies in flames and is reborn from the ashes,
represents what they hope to achieve with art and creativity in the
Caucasus.

"It is always possible to be reborn and start something from the
beginning," Micha says.

"And slowly the changes will become even more noticeable, and they
are already evident if we look back even three years ago".

First on the Georgian stage -LSD Flying TEA

Yerevan’s LSD Flying Tea play Acid Punk and usually consist of seven
people. But this time only three graced the stage in Tbilisi. Arek,
Anush and Vardan, playing Acoustic, tambourine and electric guitar
respectively, laid on a two hour set last Saturday, accompanied by
ethereal vocals from Anush.

"It is an experiment that we are doing now with three people," says
band leader Arek.

This was only the second time vocalist Anush had performed with LSD
Flying TEA.

"We chose her as she has got a very specific and rare timbre of voice
and I like her artistic skills," Arek says.

The music that they play is inspired by famous psychedelic tunes of
the sixties.

"It comes when you try to reproduce some famous tunes, but you end up
with something different, an alternative version of it. This is
something like rendering music in an innovative way," Arek says.

Initially they planned to bring their fans with them, but this
changed at the last minute and they arrived alone.

"The main thing about this concert is that we are here, in Georgia,"
Arek says, "and that we are playing for a large group of people."

But as part of creating an artistic infrastructure, reciprocity is
necessary, and in April Micha and Lado plan to take Georgian band to
Yerevan, this time accompanied by loyal fans.

http://ladoevent.art.ge

Women Make 71.9% of People Having in Armenia Status of Unemployed

WOMEN MAKE 71.9% OF PEOPLE HAVING IN ARMENIA STATUS OF UNEMPLOYED

YEREVAN, MARCH 23, NOYAN TAPAN. The middle number of the economically
active population in Armenia made 1 mln 170.2 thousand peope in
January of this year. 92.8% or 1 mln 85.6 thousand of them were
engaged in the economy, and 7.2% or 84.6 thousand did not have
work. The latters were registered at the RA Employment Service Agency
of the RA Ministry of Labour and Social Issues and got status of
unemployed. According to data of the RA National Statistical Service,
women made 71.9% of the registered unemployed people. This index grew
1.1% as if compared with same period of time of the last year.

0.4 thousand people found work in January. Women made 75% of them.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

TBILISI: Armenian citizen arrested for illegal border crossing

The Messenger, Georgia
March 23 2007

Armenian citizen arrested for illegal border crossing

An Armenian citizen has been arrested by the Coast Guard while
passing through passport control in the port of Poti, he had been
aboard a Bulgarian ship, reports the newspaper Sakartvelos
Respublica.
The citizen of Armenia crossed the Georgian border illegally on the
River Psou and crossed into Abkhazia.
The Coast Guard administration has initiated an investigation of the
case.

Moscow mayor opens `Moscow House’ in Yerevan

ITAR-TASS, Russia
March 23 2007

Moscow mayor opens `Moscow House’ in Yerevan

23.03.2007, 16.20

YEREVAN, March 23 (Itar-Tass) – The doors of Moscow House, which is
in the very centre of the Armenian capital, right opposite the
Yerevan Municipal Council, were flung wide open on Friday. The smart
modern building was put by Moscow building agencies in a matter of
only eighteen months. Yerevan architect Levon Vartanyan is author of
the project. `This is not only a symbol of strategic partnership
between the two nations, but also a symbol of the new principles, on
which all the relations are being cultivated on the entire
post-Soviet space, in particular, between Moscow and Yerevan,’ Moscow
Mayor Yuri Luzhkov stated. He came here a few hours before the House
opening ceremony. Luzhkov described Moscow House as a material
embodiment of cooperation between the two cities and nations’.

Yerevan Mayor Ervand Zakharyan stressed, in turn, that Moscow House
and the big apartment house, which the Russian capital was building
on the Northern Avenue of Yerevan. `will help further promote the
relationships between the two nations in economy, science and
culture’. It is one of the projects, included in the program of
Moscow-Yerevan contacts in the period from 2005 to 2007, the Yerevan
mayor noted.

The `Yerevan’ trade house, one of the largest commercial
establishments of the Russian capital, will be opened in Moscow on
Saturday, Luzhkov stated. Its purpose `is to market Armenian-made
goods, which are bound to be in high demand among Moscow shoppers,’
the mayor stressed.

The Friday talks here were devoted to the construction in Moscow of
an Armenian Logistics Centre, Luzhkov disclosed. `It will feature
technical appliances, mass consumption products, and foodstuffs,
which the Armenian side is ready to offer for sale in Russia,’ the
Moscow mayor stressed. He recalled that Moscow was `quite experienced
in setting up such logistics centres’. Luzhkov is sure that `this
will be economically expedient for the further development of the
economies of Russia and Armenia’.

`We spoke about human contacts, inter-state relations, and cultural
ties,’ the Moscow mayor divulged. `We are now working in comfortable
conditions, which the leaders of the two countries had created for
us. They have determined that cooperation between Russia and Armenia
is their strategy,’ he stressed.

Luzhkov handed to his Yerevan counterpart a symbolic gold key to
Moscow House. It will be passed over for eternal safekeeping to the
Yerevan History Museum, the new premises for which will be shortly
opened at the Municipal Council of the Armenian capital, Zakharyan
announced.

Nagorno Karabakh to build 12 houses for refugees this year

Regnum, Russia
March 23 2007

Nagorno Karabakh to build 12 houses for refugees this year

3, 840 families of refugees have been registered a the Nagorno
Karabakh’s government’s Office for Migration, Refugees, and
Resettlement. Today, the refugees fill out forms in which they are
are supposed to specify in detail, what moral and material damaged
they suffered. This information is to be then used as a foundation in
defining an amount of compensation a family is going to receive,
REGNUM correspondent reports.
According to the head of the agency Serzh Amirhanyan, the process of
registration is almost complete. In 2008-2010, main effort will be
directed at solving the problem of refugees’ housing. 26 houses were
built and reconstructed in 2006 for the families of refugees, 11 of
them in Stepanakert. Besides, 24 houses for refugees have been
bought. 12 more are to be built in 2007.

155 families (487 people, including 66 children) have moved from
Armenia and other countries to NKR in the recent years. They have
received the refugee status and enjoy benefits provided by the state.
A total of 105 resident houses have been built and 38 reconstructed
for the people. Last year, 1, 036bn drams were allocated for the
program. Serzh Amirhanyan says that, to solve the problems of
refugees comprehensively, Armenia, Nagorno Karabakh, and diaspora
have to consolidate efforts.

In coming 5 years volume of mortgage crediting will hit $1.5 bln

In coming 5 years the volume of mortgage crediting in Armenia will
amount to $1.5bln: CB President

Arminfo
2007-03-23 16:55:00

In the coming 3-5 years the volume of mortgage crediting in Armenia
will amount to $1.5bln, the president of the Central Bank of Armeia
Tigran Sargsyan said during the first annual meeting of the
Association of Mortgage Participants of Armenia today.

As of today this index exceeds 25bln AMD. However, this market has
huge development potential. The above index will ensure stable
economic growth in the country.

According to the Agency of Rating Marketing Information (ArmInfo), in
2006 the volume of mortgage crediting in Armenia totalled $72mln
($65mln were issued by commercial banks). 18 banks and 2 credit
organizations issue mortgage credits in Armenia. The interest ranges
within 12%-16%, the maximum repayment period – 10 year, the prepayment
– 30%.

Post-Soviet secessionist leaders worried by Russia’s Kosovo policy

Eurasia Daily Monitor, DC
March 23 2007

POST-SOVIET SECESSIONIST LEADERS WORRIED BY RUSSIA’S KOSOVO POLICY

By Vladimir Socor
Friday, March 23, 2007

Abkhazia’s `president’ Sergei Bagapsh Russia’s seemingly staunch
defense of Serbia’s `territorial integrity’ and threat to veto any
form of recognition of Kosovo’s independence is alarming the
post-Soviet secessionist leaderships. These had counted on quick
international recognition of Kosovo — whether against Russia’s will
or as part of a Western bargain with Russia — in order to use the
`precedent’ or `model’ thus created for recognition of Abkhazia,
Ossetia, Transnistria, and Karabakh.

The Kremlin had publicly and repeatedly encouraged these leaderships
to expect such a course of events. From President Vladimir Putin on
down, Russian officials threatened the West and the United Nations
with just such a scenario. Conversely, and using parallel or
alternative discourses to different audiences, Moscow is increasingly
implying that international recognition of Kosovo would establish a
dangerous `precedent’ with a domino effect and should therefore be
avoided. Moscow’s overall goal is not an outcome of either type and
probably not yet even a compromise between the two scenarios, but
simply to delay any decision and exploit all the negotiating
processes for maximum Russian advantage.

Now that Moscow has succeeded beyond expectations to slow down or
even block the international negotiations on Kosovo’s status, the
post-Soviet secessionists’ chances of official recognition, at least
by Russia, seems to be slipping to their fingers. Hoping to retrieve
that opportunity, delegations from Abkhazia and South Ossetia — as
well as, covertly, from Transnistria — rushed to Moscow in recent
days to plead for quick Russian recognition of their secessions.

Abkhazia’s `president’ Sergei Bagapsh and `foreign minister’ Sergei
Shamba, as well as South Ossetia’s `president’ Eduard Kokoiti, met
with Russian government and Duma officials and held news conferences,
one of which also featured Kremlin consultant Sergei Markov. Their
core demand is for unilateral Russian recognition as soon as
possible, before any international decision is reached regarding
Kosovo’s status. If that decision endorses Serbia’s territorial
integrity, or if it produces a compromise, the post-Soviet
secessionist leaderships fear being dealt a corresponding setback.
Consequently, their motto at the public appearances in Moscow became,
`It’s now or never’ for Russian recognition of their `republics’
(Interfax, March 18-20).

Should the negotiated status of Kosovo fall short of independence and
international recognition, Sukhumi and Tskhinvali as well as Tiraspol
and to some extent Karabakh fear that Russia would have to adopt at
least publicly a more ambiguous stance regarding their interests.
Thus, they packaged their own demand for recognition in the language
of Russia’s geopolitical interests. They argued that Georgia’s
admission to NATO is a foregone conclusion, would occur sooner rather
than later, would be followed by Azerbaijan, and even Armenia might
have no choice but to follow suit. Abkhazia and South Ossetia would
become Russia’s last remaining outposts in the South Caucasus and
buffers against NATO, they pleaded.

Moreover, they warned, a younger generation of politicians might come
to power in Sukhumi and Tskhinvali, with formative experiences
different from those of the incumbent generation of leaders. Those
future leaders’ behavior would be difficult to predict, particularly
when faced with a NATO presence on their doorstep. Inasmuch as the
present generation rules out being part of a NATO member country if
Georgia joins the alliance, Russia can choose between recognizing
Abkhazia and South Ossetia now or `losing the South Caucasus
entirely’ before long.

For its part, Russia does not at all feel that it must follow the
same set of rules or standards for settling the Kosovo and the
post-Soviet conflicts. While professing to link those processes for
bargaining purposes, Moscow keeps the two tracks starkly distinct
from one another in practice. Minister of Foreign Affairs Sergei
Lavrov implicitly underscored that dual approach in his March 21
government-hour speech to the Duma. For the first time on the record,
Lavrov termed Abkhazia, South Ossetia, and Transnistria `republics,’
soon after his MFA had begun referring to those enclaves’ leaders as
`presidents’ in its official documents. Lavrov’s deliberate choice of
words delighted the ultranationalist opposition politician Sergei
Baburin, who is a staunch advocate both of Serbia’s `territorial
integrity’ and, simultaneously, of recognizing the post-Soviet
secessionist territories.

The Russian government itself follows that dual approach increasingly
boldly. In his speech, Lavrov asserted that any link between the
Kosovo resolution and post-Soviet conflict resolution would not be
direct or automatic. Whatever the outcome in Kosovo — that is, even
if it preserves Serbia’s territorial integrity — Russia will in any
case be responsible for the populations of Abkhazia and South Ossetia
because they are citizens of Russia, Lavrov argued. The clear
implication is that Russia would hold on to these occupied
territories of Georgia while at the same time advocating for
territorial integrity in the case of Serbia (Interfax, March 21).

Similarly, and on the same day, Russian State Secretary and Deputy
Minister of Foreign Affairs Grigory Karasin staunchly defended
Russia’s control of the Abkhaz and South Ossetian sectors of the
Georgia-Russia border. Refusing to admit to any violation of that
internationally recognized border, Karasin adduced for justification
that Russia controls those borders effectively, interdicting
contraband and arms trafficking (demonstrably a false claim). Russia
has officially informed Tbilisi in January of Russia’s position on
this issue, Karasin said (Interfax, March 21). However, Russia this
simultaneously calls for the inviolability of Serbia’s borders in the
case of Kosovo.

The leaders of Armenia and Karabakh are adhering to the familiar
position — which was also long shared by their post-Soviet
counterparts — that the outcome in Kosovo has little or no bearing
on the outcome in their cases. Armenian Minister of Foreign Affairs
Vardan Oskanian sums up this position as follows: If Kosovo is
internationally recognized as an independent state, Karabakh would
gain an additional argument. If the Kosovo conflict is settled in
some other way, short of independence and recognition, Karabakh will
go its own way in any case (Arminfo, March 21).