Armenia not to receive request from USA concerning MDS radar deploy

PanARMENIAN.Net

Armenia not to receive request from U.S.A. concerning MDS radar deployment
02.03.2007 17:18 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Armenia has not received any official request from
the United States concerning MDS radar deployment in her territory, RA
MFA Acting Press Secretary Vladimir Karapetyan told the
PanARMENIAN.Net journalist. `Vesti.Ru’ reports the Armenian Defense
Ministry also has confirmed that the issue of deploying radar has not
been discussed.

U.S. MDA Director Lt. Gen. Henry Obering stated that the Pentagon
would like to have a radar station in Caucasus in the framework of
missile defense system, which will be constructed in near future. At
the same time H. Obering did not clarify what country the matter is
about.

Armenian Dashnaks deny plans to nominate next Karabakh leader

Armenian Dashnaks deny plans to nominate next Karabakh leader

Hayots Ashkharh, Yerevan
1 Mar 07

Text of unattributed report by Armenian newspaper Hayots Ashkharh on 1
March headline "Fiction and lie"

"The Armenian Revolutionary Federation – Dashnaktsutyun has no plans
to nominate [Dashnaktsutyun member] Artur Aghabekyan for the Nagornyy
Karabakh presidential election [June 2007]. There are no such
plans. It is fiction and a lie," the deputy parliament speaker and
member of the Armenian Revolutionary Federation – Dashnaktsutyun,
Vahan Hovhannisyan, told reporters yesterday, commenting on media
reports.

He confirmed that Aghabekyan is on the proportional list of the
Armenian Revolutionary Federation – Dashnaktsutyun. Hovhannisyan will
not take part [in the Armenian parliamentary election on 12 May] under
the first-past-the-post system.

Proper conduct of elections in RA to become signal for EU coop

PanARMENIAN.Net

Proper conduction of elections in RA to become signal
for EU to deepen cooperation
02.03.2007 17:23 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Armenian Deputy Foreign Minister Armen Bayburtyan
had a meeting with EU Special representative in South Caucasus Peter
Semneby currently with a visit in Yerevan. At the meeting the sides
discussed Armenia-EU cooperation issues, particularly realization of
Action Plan in the framework of European Neighborhood Policy. Armen
Bayburtyan noted the plan of events of realizing the program is on the
stage of elaboration and will be offered to the EU in near future.

Armen Bayburtyan and Peter Semneby also discussed the issue of coming
parliamentary elections in Armenia, focusing on the importance to hold
the elections in accordance with international standards.

Peter Semneby stated that proper conduction of elections in will
become a signal for the EU on to deepen bilateral cooperation. The
sides also touched upon the negotiation process of the Nagorno
Karabakh conflict settlement. At the meeting also Germany’s Ambassador
to Armenia Heike Renate Peitsch was present, the RA MFA Press Office
reports.

Armenian, Iranian mins negotiate gas pipeline opening date in Tehran

Armenian, Iranian ministers negotiate gas pipeline opening date in Tehran

Public Television of Armenia, Yerevan
1 Mar 07

[Armenian] Energy Minister Armen Movsisyan and Iranian Foreign
Minister Manuchehr Mottaki have discussed in Teheran the present state
and the future of Armenian-Iranian energy cooperation.

Mottaki pointed out that the potential of cooperation is greater than
the level the sides have reached currently. [Armenia and Iran] can
cooperate in different sectors, Mottaki said.

Armen Movsisyan is in Teheran to negotiate the final date for the
opening of the Iran-Armenia gas pipeline’s first section. The
presidents of both countries are expected to participate in the
opening ceremony. The presidents are also expected to sign an
intergovernmental agreement to build a hydro-electric power plant on
the River Araks.

Armenian opposition movement holds rally in Yerevan

Armenian opposition movement holds rally in Yerevan

Arminfo
2 Mar 07

Yerevan, 2 March: "We have to state today that unfortunately, the
Armenian opposition could not put aside its ambitions and
stereotypes," Ashot Sargsyan of the Armenian Pan-National Movement
said at the rally of the Alternative movement [on 2 March].

He said President Robert Kocharyan’s impeachment should be the key
goal of the new public movement. The impeachment could be initiated by
the parliament to be elected on 12 May. "This is why we called on the
entire opposition at our first rally on 20 February to unite in one
election bloc called Impeachment which could consolidate the efforts
to fight together. No opposition party opposed the initiative, some of
them even supported it. The current situation allowed us to see the
real faces of some of the opposition leaders. The authorities have
received a unique opportunity to stage a show called a ‘parliamentary
election’," Sargsyan said.

Political expert Aghasi Yenokyan said that lack of unity among the
opposition in the parliamentary election campaign is the result of the
tricks by President Kocharyan’s agents, who did their best to prevent
the opposition from uniting. He said that no problem of the country
could be resolved "until Kocharyan’s killers travel freely in the city
and fight leaving innocent people dead". He said that for the
Alternative movement, the participation in the parliamentary election
is a means of fighting for free and fair elections.

Statements were voiced at the rally, which was attended by around
1,500 people, that ruling parties’ actual rating was no more than 10
per cent and that it took only determination and will to win the
election. The next rally of Alternative supporters will be held on 9
March.

US media body laments increasing pressure on Armenian journalists

US media body laments increasing pressure on Armenian journalists

Arminfo
2 Mar 07

Yerevan, 2 March: Sixteen cases of preventing journalists from
exercising their professional duties were registered in Armenia in
2006, a study by Internews, a non-governmental organization, has
revealed. Only one of those cases has been referred to court.

David Sandukhchyan, the head of the Internews legal department, has
said the number of attacks on Armenian journalists has significantly
grown compared with previous years. Moreover, in most cases, the law
enforcers have played the role of the "pressure mechanism" on the mass
media. He described as unacceptable the situation when no individual
or entity had been prosecuted for physical violence against
journalists. Sandukhchyan said that only in few cases, some
individuals had been subjected to "minor" fines.

According to the study, only one criminal case has been launched under
Article 164 of the Armenian Criminal Code (preventing journalists from
exercising their professional duties, or pressuring them to
disseminate or not to disseminate information) since 1 August 2003; a
case was launched after a claim was filed by Aravot reporter Anna
Israyelyan. The case ended by the [assailant] paying 100,000 drams
[about 280 dollars] to the victim [Israyelyan]. So, Sandukhchyan
said, Article 164 exists only on paper. In reality, mass media
representatives are not protected by the law at all. "The country’s
government has not worked out effective mechanisms of protecting the
professional activities of journalists," Sandukhchyan said. He said
that in some cases, after journalists had turned to law-enforcement
agencies, criminal cases were launched against them (as it was the
case with photo journalist Gagik Shemshyan).

He said the situation in the country is such that representatives of
courts and law-enforcement agencies, applying brutal and illegal
methods, also cover up illegal activities of individuals and
entities. "I don’t rule out that there might be more cases of
unpunished pressure on journalists in connection with the forthcoming
parliamentary election," he said.

According to Sandukhchyan, only a stricter punishment for preventing
journalists from exercising their professional duties could change the
situation more or less. Internews has proposed amending Article 164 of
the Armenian Criminal Code as follows: actions against journalists or
their proxies when exercising their professional duties, which involve
violence and which result in harm inflicted to health or life, shall
be punished by a fine equalling 250 to 450 minimal salaries or
corrective labour for up to two years or imprisonment for up to five
years.

Post-Assassination Con Games

AZG Armenian Daily #040, 03/03/2007

Genocide and Hrant Dink Murder

POST-ASSASSINATION CON GAMES

By David B. Boyajian

Make no mistake: Turkey and its friends are turning the assassination
of journalist and human rights activist Hrant Dink to their advantage.

With few exceptions, the international community and media have put
most of the blame on the destructive atmosphere created by Turkish
"nationalists" and "ultra-nationalists."

True, Prime Minister Recep Erdogan and his Islamic AKP Party came in
for some criticism, but only because these allegedly "moderate,"
"reformist" sweethearts were supposedly not standing up to the big,
bad "nationalists."

It’s the old "good cop – bad cop" routine: We’re now all supposed to
trust the "good cops," Erdogan and the AKP.

Never mind that the AKP is a strongly conservative, right-of-center –
hence nationalist – political party. Never mind that it was an
AKP-majority parliament that enacted Article 301, the law against
"denigrating Turkishness" under which Dink had been convicted.

Never mind that Erdogan has called for a beefed-up campaign of
Genocide denial. Never mind that he’s dispatching AKP member and
Foreign Minister Abdullah Gul and AKP parliamentarians to the U.S. to
demand that Congress defeat the Armenian Genocide resolution.

Con Games

Another con game that Turkey’s friends are playing goes like this:
`Yes, Dink’s murder was unfortunate. But it’s just a bump in Turkey’s
road to reform. The Turkish government needs your sympathy and the
help of the European Union (EU) more than ever.’

That’s no exaggeration. Read part of the EU’s reaction to the slaying:
"Turkey will steadfastly continue along the path towards … freedom
of expression."

And like much of the media, the Wall Street Journal Europe remained in
a state of denial: "Turkey’s democracy is as healthy and vibrant
… as never before." Fascinating. Assassinations and prosecutions of
dissidents are apparently signs of political health.

Count on the West to continue babbling about "reforming" Turkey while
providing it ever more political support, money, and weapons.

Not Just 301

Governments and media worldwide are attempting another
post-assassination con job by calling for repeal of Article 301, as if
that would be a cure-all. As if prior to 2005, when 301 was enacted,
Turkey was a shining example of freedom.

Turkey has long had numerous laws that stifle dissent. Laws against
separatism, for instance, are used to prosecute Kurdish political
activity. And Article 216, which outlaws "enmity … towards another
group," is currently used against those who acknowledge the
Genocide. Even Turks point out that the government has plenty of laws
it can use if 301 is repealed.

For some Armenians, Dink’s huge funeral march of Turks, Armenians,
Kurds, and others, stirred hopes for cooperation and reform.

The march was mainly about Turkish civil rights in general, however,
not necessarily Genocide acknowledgment or Armenia. Moreover, nearly
200 years of Turkish "reforms" have proven disastrous for Armenians.

Reform’s Tragedies

Turkey’s Tanzimat decrees of 1839 and 1856 promised equality for all
Ottoman citizens, including Armenians. They were largely failures.

The Ottoman Armenian National Constitution, approved in 1863, did
little to improve the lives of ordinary Armenians. The Turkish
Constitution was suspended soon after it was proclaimed in 1876.

The Treaty of Berlin (1878) promised European oversight of reforms in
the Armenian provinces. It, too, failed. Continuing "reforms"
culminated in the 1890’s massacres of 300,000 Armenians.

In 1908, the empire’s Armenians, Turks, and other ethnic groups raised
banners hailing the "reformist" Young Turk revolution and literally
embraced in the streets. Somewhat like the Dink funeral procession.

The following year saw 30,000 Armenians slaughtered in Adana. Eerily
similar to what Erdogan would do 98 years later, the Young Turks
apologized – insincerely – but blamed ultra-nationalists.

A European plan to supervise reform in the Ottoman Armenian provinces
in 1914 never got off the ground. Under the cover of WW I, Turkey
then used genocide to "reform" the Armenian provinces.

After the war, Kemal Ataturk, the well-known "modernizer" and
"reformer," massacred and expelled most remaining Armenians and
attacked the just-born Armenian Republic.

"Modern" Turkey continued mistreating its remaining Christians using
discrimination, labor camps, riots, and confiscation, down to the
present day.

Imagine that each of the foregoing example of "reform" were to take
place in today’s Turkey. The world – including some Armenians – would
stand up and clap. As we can now look back and see that tragedies have
followed each Turkish "reform," it might be wiser to hold the
applause.

Nevertheless, will the EU successfully reform Turkey, and might Turkey
then amend its policies toward Armenia?

The EU Looks East

Though the EU has affirmed the Genocide, it has rejected any
requirement that Turkey itself must do so before joining. That shows
bad faith towards Armenia.

Reforming Turkey isn’t the EU’s primary interest anyway. Rather, the
EU – pushed along by Washington and London – wishes to use Turkey to
reach into the massive oil and gas reserves of the Middle East,
Caspian Sea basin and Central Asia, and to surround Russia.

The EU will subsidize and re-invigorate the Turkish economy. Turkey’s
value to the West, as well as its military power and belligerence, can
only grow.

But might Turkey, as an EU member, orient itself to Europe and thus
turn away from adventures to the east that could harm Armenia?
Probably not. As the West wishes to dominate the Caspian, Turkish
policy will necessarily be directed even more assertively to the east,
where sits Armenia. Such an eastern orientation bodes ill as the West
has always, in the final analysis, sided with Turkey against
Armenians.

It would be tragic if the prospect of Turkish reform, and the hope now
felt by some Armenians over the amity displayed during Dink’s funeral,
made them forget the hard lessons of history.

Send instant messages to your online friends

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

http://au.messenger.yahoo.com

Another Azerbaijani Hysteria

AZG Armenian Daily #040, 03/03/2007

Armenia-Azerbaijan Relations

ANOTHER AZERBAIJANI HYSTERIA

On a Southern Caucasian foodstuffs security conference, which has
started recently in Tbilisi, Georgia, Azerbaijan raised a complaint
against Armenia. The matter is that a business catalogue of Armenian
export companies included also several exporters from
Nagorno-Karabakh. According to Radio Liberty, the Azerbaijani side was
irritated by the fact that the companies from Nagorno-Karabakh were
represented as Armenian. Moreover, the catalogue was published by the
means of a Swiss development agency, and therefore Azerbaijan is
likely to consider the fact as an offence of international law.

By Agavni Haroutiunian

Cyprus Gov’t Issues New Preservation Order on Melkonian Property

AZG Armenian Daily #040, 03/03/2007

CYPRUS GOV’T ISSUES NEW PRESERVATION ORDER ON MELKONIAN PROPERTY

Alumni Association praises Minister Sylikiotis, Representative
Mahdessian for their help

Nicosia (March 2, 2007) — The Melkonian Alumni Association of Cyprus
would like to announce that Interior Minister Neoclis Sylikiotis has
issued a new preservation order on for the disputed estate of the
Melkonian school in Nicosia which could cause indefinite delays in the
administrators’ efforts to dispose of the land.

The order was published in the Republic of Cyprus Official Gazette
(Section III(i), No. 4178) on Friday, March 2nd, 2007, with immediate
effect, which means that no one can harm any part of the old buildings
erected in 1925 or even cut any of the trees of the forest on Limassol
Ave. planted by the first orphans who found shelter in Cyprus after
the Genocide of the Armenians by the Ottoman Turks.

A previous order, declaring most of the 125,000 sq.m. property a
heritage site with "historical, architectural and national importance"
had been overturned by the Supreme Court in Nicosia last December
following an appeal by the lawyers of the AGBU.

The Armenian community then wrote to the President of the Supreme
Court, the Attorney General, political party leaders and the Interior
Minister expressing its dismay at the decision and calling on all
parties involved to review the matter and reinstate the preservation
order.

Reports published in the Cyprus media and reported on CyBC public
television in February suggested that the Town Planning Dept. had
reviewed the case and was working on a new preservation order based on
stronger arguments justifying the decision in order to prevent the
case from being thrown out of court again.

"I am delighted with this news as it shows the determination of the
Republic of Cyprus and in particular the Minister of Interior to
protect this important site not only for the Armenians of Cyprus and
the whole Diaspora, but also for all the people of Cyprus for whom the
Melkonian has been and will always be a jewel with historic value,"
said the Armenian Representative in the House, Vartkes Mahdessian.

The Melkonian Alumni, who were at the forefront of the struggle to
save the Melkonian ever since the decision to close the school was
made three years ago, were praiseful of the efforts of a few dedicated
people at the Town Planning Authority.

"They seem to have appreciated more than some people in Cyprus and
abroad the true value and importance of this historic school and the
need for quality education," the Alumni said.

The Alumni also made references to the justification used to
reintroduce the new preservation order according to which it is deemed
imperative "to protect the larger part of the property with historic
traditional buildings as a unified whole, as the property with its
structured and natural environs is part of the larger historic and
traditional town planning network of Nicosia, which must be
protected."

The Alumni conclude that "with such decisions, as well as the general
support of the whole community, hopes to reopen the school one day are
revived. We thank the Representative, Mr. Mahdessian and the Minister,
Mr. Sylikiotis, for all their efforts in this direction."

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Armenia denies knowledge of US plans to deploy radar in Caucasus

Armenia denies knowledge of US plans to deploy radar in Caucasus

ITAR-TASS news agency, Moscow
2 Mar 07

Yerevan, 2 March: Armenia has not received any official information from the
USA on the possible deployment in the country of elements of an anti-missile
defence system, an official spokesman of the Armenian Foreign Ministry,
Vladimir Karapetyan, told ITAR-TASS today.
The Armenian Foreign Ministry has learnt about the US plans to deploy a
missile-tracking radar in the Caucasus from the press, the diplomat said.
[Passage omitted: background]