Turkish court shuts down YouTube

Turkish court shuts down YouTube

By Vincent Boland in Istanbul
Financial Times

Published: March 7 2007 17:05 | Last updated: March 7 2007 17:05

Turkey’s largest internet services provider shut down access to the YouTube
video-sharing web site on Wednesday after a court ruling that some of its
content insulted Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, the founder of modern Turkey.

The decision followed days of furious insult-sharing among Turkish and Greek
users of the popular and controversial site.

The result was a flood of complaints to the site and to the media from
Turkish users angered by what one newspaper said were "fanatic Greeks
broadcasting videos" insulting Ataturk.

Turk Telekom acted first by removing the offending items, but a court
ordered access to the site to be blocked late on Tuesday after prosecutors
brought a case against YouTube.

A message posted on the site late on Wednesday said access had been
suspended following a decision by an Istanbul court. One video posted on the
site allegedly claimed that Ataturk and Turks were "homosexuals". Ataturk,
who died in 1938, is a revered figure in Turkey and it is a crime to
"insult" him or state institutions. Many writers, including the Nobel
literature laureate Orhan Pamuk, have faced trial for work that allegedly
breaches this law.

Paul Doany, chief executive of Turk Telekom, said the company had received a
faxed copy of the court’s decision on Tuesday. "YouTube’s services have been
suspended in Turkey in accordance with this decision," he said.

The site would remain blocked until the court decided otherwise.

The decision to shut off access to the site was not a judgement on the
material broadcast, he added, but a response to a legal decision. The
government has promised to look at ways of amending article 301 of Turkey’s
penal code, under which prosecutions of writers can be brought. But it
appears unlikely that the article will be abolished, as campaigners have
urged.

Copyright < > The Financial
Times Limited 2007

http://www.ft.com/servicestools/help/copyright

Israeli businessmen: We have to hide to trade in Turkey Israeli

Israeli businessmen: We have to hide to trade in Turkey Israeli

Today’s Zaman
08.03.2007

businessmen said during a Turkey-Israel joint economic council meeting
on Wednesday that certain companies with Jewish capital had to conceal
their actual identities to operate in Turkey because of anti-Semitic
sentiment.

Turkish State Minister for Foreign Trade K?Ã?¼r?Å?at T?Ã?¼zmen, however, denied
this claim and said there were many Israeli companies trading in Turkey
and that discrimination against Jewish capital was out of question.

Israeli businessmen expressed their complaints at the meeting, attended
by a T?Ã?¼zmen-led delegation of Turkish businessmen.

T?Ã?¼zmen responded to reporters’ questions regarding the issue during a
visit to Masjid al-Aqsa and the Dome of the Rock. T?Ã?¼zmen stated that
Turks’ tolerance toward Jews was well known and added that Israeli
businessmen were not discriminated against. He noted that Jewish
investors had major representatives in Turkey.

`Jewish businessmen occupy a significant position in Turkey.
Discrimination against them is out of question,’ he said.

T?Ã?¼zmen also noted that Israeli businessmen had expressed their support
for Turkey regarding a Armenian genocide resolution presented to the US
House of Representatives. The clout of the Jewish lobby in the US is
well known, T?Ã?¼zmen said. `They expressed significant support,’ he said.

`We are sensitive about Harem al-Sharif’

T?Ã?¼zmen said while visiting the Al-Aqsa Mosque that a review board would
go to Jerusalem to make assessments on construction of a bridge at Harem
al-Sharif (Noble Sanctuary). He said Turkish Ambassador to Israel Nam?Ä?±k
Tan was the one pursuing the issue. T?Ã?¼zmen underlined the sensitivity in
the Islamic world over the issue. T?Ã?¼zmen also visited the Kubbet
el-Sahra Mosque and prayed there.

08.03.2007

H?Ã?¼seyin S?Ã?¼mer Jerusalem

ylar.do?load=detay&link=104792

http://www.todayszaman.com/tz-web/deta

The Law Should Have Been Passed With No Against Votes And Abstention

THE LAW SHOULD HAVE BEEN PASSED WITH NO AGAINST VOTES AND ABSTENTIONS EDITORIAL

Yerkir.am
March 02, 2007

This week the National Assembly passed the package of legislative
amendments proposed by the government to institutionalize dual
citizenship.

66 deputies voted for the law, 5 voted against and one
abstained. Leader of ARF’s parliamentary faction Hrayr KARAPETIAN
believes it would be better if this package that has pan-Armenian
significance would have been passed with no against votes and
abstentions.

At a press conference held in Urbat (Friday) Club on February
27 Karapetian stated that dual citizenship will contribute to
strengthening of Armenia, economic development as well as strengthening
of the Armenian lobby abroad.

"Dual citizenship derives from the necessity to restore historical
justice for our nation," Karapetian stated adding that this is not
only about Armenians living abroad as a result of the Genocide but
also about those who left Armenia in the dark and cold years that
followed Armenia’s independence.

ARF has supported the idea of dual citizenship for a long time and
the legal institutionalization of dual citizenship was a logical
continuation of ARF’s efforts in this direction. Commenting on the
rights and obligations of persons with dual citizenship Karapetian
noted that according to this law, all Armenians who will apply to
get Armenian citizenship will have the same rights and obligations
as Armenian citizens under the constitution.

"We should not overcomplicate dual citizenship. I can see that not only
politicians but also some mass media keep saying that there are still
many unanswered questions in what relates to dual citizenship. There
are no unanswered questions," Karapetian stated noting that the rights
and obligations are the same with the exception of the right to vote
and be elected.

"ARF was very clear about the fact that it was necessary to take an
approach similar to the one taken by states that have large Diasporas
like Israel, Ireland, Mexico. The ideal option would be to have equal
rights and obligations for everyone.

However, since some political and not legal issues were raised,
ARF accepted some compromises taking into consideration the law’s
importance as a political document," Karapetian said adding that the
proposal made by the Republican Party to grant a status of a legal
resident was not acceptable for the ARF. According to this proposal,
only those persons with dual citizenship would be able to vote who
have lived in Armenia for some time and paid taxes.

"It was unacceptable for us to pass a law and put limitations that
would make the law dysfunctional. We agreed only to the provision
according to which persons with dual citizenship will be able to vote
only if they have Armenian registration," Karapetian said.

Commenting on the question whether ARF is going to appeal to the
Constitutional Court to question the constitutionality of this
provision, Karapetian stated that this issue is currently under
discussion and no final decision has been made so far. If some
difficulties arise while the law is already in force, this option
might be possible.

Look for sensations in other parties’ lists

"Don’t look for any sensations in our party list, you can look for
them in other parties’ lists," Karapetian advised the journalists.

ARF’s party list will be finalized on March 3 when it is presented to
the Central Electoral Commission. Karapetian said no matter who is
in the party list ARF will continue its policy line. ARF has always
supported the idea of 100% proportional electoral system therefore,
the party will concentrate on proportional mandates even though the
possibility for nominating candidates under majoritarian system is
not excluded either.

As to the traditional transfers from one party to another, some
politicians’ habit of changing parties is unacceptable for ARF.

Karapetian believes the voters can see this and will express their
will during the elections. Commenting on ARF’s expectations from the
elections Karapetian noted that ARF will have a larger representation
in the new parliament than today based on the work conducted in the
incumbent parliament as well as ARF’s extra-parliamentary activities.

It Is Necessary To Counter The Turkish And Azeri Anti-Armenian Propa

IT IS NECESSARY TO COUNTER THE TURKISH AND AZERI ANTI-ARMENIAN PROPAGANDA
By Karine Mangassarian

Yerkir.am
March 02, 2007

Armenia is not responding adequately to Turkey’s and Azerbaijan’s
anti-Armenian hysteria both internally and on the international
arena. It is necessary to take well-coordinated measures and implement
state policies in this direction. It is necessary to be pro-active
and not only take a responsive stance.

Armenian intellectuals and political leaders that participated in a
round table discussion titled "The Armenian Aspect of Turkey’s and
Azerbaijan’s propaganda" arrived at this conclusion. The discussion
was organized by ARF’s Supreme Body on February 28.

In her opening remarks member of ARF’s Supreme Body Lilit Galstian
stated that February 28 was selected for holding this discussion
because this is the day of commemoration of Armenians massacred in
Sumgait and Azerbaijan.

"Political reflections: realities"

Member of ARF’s Bureau, Deputy Chairman of the National Assembly Vahan
Hovhannissian noted that the main principles for Armenia’s information
and spiritual security are stated in the National Security Concept
even though this document in itself is not ideal.

Who is the target of the Turkish-Azeri propaganda? Answering this
question Hovhannissian noted that there are three targets – the
international organizations, mass media and public opinion, and the
Azeri and Armenian people.

"Since they are saying different things to these different audiences
they give us an excellent tool that we do not use. They are trying
to scare the Armenian nation saying that if a new war starts Armenia
will inevitably lose it, they are trying to convince us that Armenia
cannot do anything against the 7 million Azeris and 70 million Turks,"
Hovhannissian said noting that Azerbaijan has not achieved any success
in this respect because the Armenian nation is the winning nation.

"However, we cannot do nothing against their propaganda. Our people
should understand that Azerbaijan has always been stronger in terms
of its resources, but we have managed to defeat them in the liberation
war in Artsakh," Hovhannissian stated.

Hovhannissian believes the Azeri people are told the same thing –
that they are very strong. And it is the Azeri military leaders who
are making these statements. They are saying they are ready to solve
the conflict with a new war at any time. "A question arises – if you
are ready, why aren’t you solving it?" Hovhannissian said.

The two audiences, the Armenian and Azeri people, are receiving
the same information which, however, contradicts the Azeri and
Turkish propaganda at the international level where Azerbaijan is
presented as the miserable state flooded with refugees and people
dying of hunger… "On the one hand we see threats while on the other
hand there is the victim’s image. We should be able to show to the
international community both these images and we should adhere to
two main principles.

The Kars-Akhalqalaq railway costs several hundred million dollars and
if Azerbaijan is ready to solve the Karabagh issue without taking
into consideration this factor, why isn’t it going ahead? Because
it is not ready to solve the issue with a new war. Armenians must
understand this.

We should not lobby in international organizations that this railway is
not built. We should do our best to make this process controllable,"
Hovhannissian said. It should be controllable so that the railway is
not used for transportation of weapons, and this should be the main
line of Armenian propaganda, Hovhannissian believes.

Armenia’s diplomacy should also change, Hovhannissian believes. Armenia
should stop being the peaceful and tolerant side in Karabagh
negotiations.

"We go for consensus while Azerbaijan doesn’t, and we can see that
pressure is put on us and not on Azerbaijan. Therefore, it’s high
time we state – either Karabagh participates in the negotiations,
or negotiations make no sense.

Today we are merely in the preparatory phase of the negotiations. Final
negotiations cannot be held without Karabagh. We should take a harder
line in the negotiations and demand that Karabagh is also involved
to give a new meaning and substance to the negotiations process,"
Hovhannissian stated. It is up to experts to decide how these issues
should be presented to shape the right public opinion.

It is necessary to undertake concrete measures

Director of the Institute of History of the Academy of Sciences Ashot
Melkonian commented on the issue of Genocide stating that the process
of international recognition of the Genocide is completed and it is
time to raise the political and legal aspects of this issue, in other
words, it is time to demand reparations. "We should start speaking
about reparations, and this is not a task only for the Diaspora but
the entire Armenian nation," Melkonian stated.

Director of the Center for Armenian Architecture Studies Samvel
Karapetian commented on cultural issues pointing out to what happened
in Turkey 30 years ago and what is going on in Azerbaijan today.

"The entire Azerbaijan is like Jugha today, the attitude towards
historical monuments is the same everywhere," Karapetian said. He
suggested appealing to international courts to denounce the
Turkish-Azeri vandalism in the legal domain. "We should have
state-level policies to counter the Turkish-Azeri propaganda,"
Karapetian said.

Head of the Armenian History Chair at Yerevan State University Babken
Harutyunian raised the issue of creating a special information center.

Harutyunian believes even the issue of the Genocide would have been
forgotten had it not been for the Hay Dat Offices.

Harutyunian said the Armenian authorities are merely responding to
the false statements made by the Turkish-Azeri propaganda machine
while they should be pro-active. Harutyunian said it is strange that
the Armenian National Assembly has not yet recognized the Sumgait
massacres as a genocide because what happened in Sumgait can be
defined as a genocide under the international convention.

Director of the Genocide Museum Hayk Demoyan noted that the Azeri
president’s family is involved in Azerbaijan’s anti-Armenian
propaganda. Ilham Aliyev’s wife and daughter are involved in
publication and dissemination of anti-Armenian literature.

President of the Journalists’ Union of Armenia Astghik Gevorgian
stressed the importance of publications and dissemination of
information that can counter Azerbaijan’s anti-Armenian propaganda.

A new book as a new step in propaganda

A book titled "Against Azerbaijan’s Anti-Armenian Policies" was
presented at the roundtable discussion. The book was published by
ARF. It includes articles by non-Armenian historians which makes the
book more interesting, member of ARF’s Supreme Body Haykazun Alvrtsian
said. He believes special attention should be paid to publications
in the press since it is largely influenced by the Azeri and Turkish
propaganda. An attempt is made to transfer such propaganda to the
domain of the relations between the government and the opposition
which is completely unacceptable, Alvrtsian concluded.

Unacceptable Preconditions In Armenian-Turkish Relations

UNACCEPTABLE PRECONDITIONS IN ARMENIAN-TURKISH RELATIONS

Yerkir.am
March 02, 2007

Turkey does not have the necessary range of concessions to offer in
exchange for not passing the bill on the Armenian Genocide in the US
House of Representatives.

If Turkey is ready for some concessions it should publicize them,
Deputy Chairman of the National Assembly Vahan Hovhannissian stated
replying to a question by an ArmInfo reporter.

Commenting on the opportunities for normalization of the
Armenian-Turkish relations in exchange for freezing the bill on the
Armenian Genocide in the US House of Representatives Hovhannissian
stated, "Turkey is putting forward preconditions for establishing
diplomatic relations between Armenia and Turkey and these preconditions
are unacceptable for the Armenian side.

If Turkey intends to put these preconditions aside, it should publicly
state so. After all, it is the US parliament and not the Armenian
one that is passing a bill on the Armenian Genocide, in other words,
we are not to decide on this matter. It is the Congressmen that will
have to decide whether it is sufficient for Turkey to put aside its
preconditions," Hovhannissian stated.

Armenian Minister, US State Secretary Discuss Karabakh, Forthcoming

ARMENIAN MINISTER, US STATE SECRETARY DISCUSS KARABAKH, FORTHCOMING ELECTION

Arminfo
6 Mar 07

Yerevan, 6 March: Armenian Foreign Minister Vardan Oskanyan and US
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice discussed the progress of the
talks on a peaceful settlement to the Nagornyy Karabakh conflict in
Washington yesterday.

They also discussed issues related to the development of bilateral
ties, the Armenian Foreign Ministry department of information and
the press has told Arminfo news agency.

They noted the significance of the Millennium Challenge programme
developed by the US government in the implementation of a programme to
alleviate poverty in Armenia’s rural districts. Vardan Oskanyan briefed
Rice on the already completed preparations for the implementation of
the project.

They also talked about the forthcoming parliamentary election in
Armenia and noted the importance of the election meeting international
standards.

They also discussed regional problems, the present state of
Armenian-Turkish relations and the USA’s intermediary initiatives to
settle them.

On the same day, Vardan Oskanyan had a number of meetings at the
US Congress.

Armenian NGO To Monitor May Parliament Election

ARMENIAN NGO TO MONITOR MAY PARLIAMENT ELECTION

Mediamax news agency
6 Mar 07

Yerevan, 6 March: The Choice is Yours NGO, which will send its
observers to all the polling stations during the parliamentary election
of 12 May, "does not have political goals".

NGO head Harutyun Hambardzumyan said this in the Friday press club
today. He recalled that the observers have no right to dispute
registered violations in court. "We do not have political goals,
we will be just publishing registered violations, and it is up to
political parties to struggle for their votes," Hambardzumyan said.

The Choice is Yours will prepare video materials which will inform
the people that all the unlawful actions during the election are
punishable under the Criminal Code.

The observation mission of The Choice is Yours organization is realized
with the financial assistance of the US Agency for International
Development (USAID).

Kazakhstan, Georgia Sign Road Service Deal

KAZAKHSTAN, GEORGIA SIGN ROAD SERVICE DEAL

Interfax-Kazakhstan news agency, Almaty
6 Mar 07

Astana, 6 March: Kazakh Minister of Transport and Communications
Serik Akhmetov and Georgian Deputy Minister of Economic Development
Ivane Nakaidze signed an agreement in Astana on Tuesday [6 March]
on international road service, an Interfax-Kazakhstan correspondent
has reported.

The Kazakh Transport and Communications Ministry said in a press
release circulated during the ceremony in which the document was
signed that the agreement would regulate the procedure of transit of
the two countries’ vehicles through their territories and create a
legal basis for boosting cooperation in the field of international
road service and simplifying the process of haulage.

[Passage omitted: more details of the agreement; Kazakhstan has
similar agreements with Armenia, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan]

Ruben Torosian: "Central Electoral Commission Deprive "Supreme Counc

RUBEN TOROSIAN: "CENTRAL ELECTORAL COMMISSION DEPRIVE "SUPREME COUNCIL – DEPUTY CLUB" OF RIGHT OF OBSERVATION MISSION IN ILLEGAL WAY

Noyan Tapan
Mar 06 2007

YEREVAN, MARCH 6, NOYAN TAPAN. The RA Central Electoral Commission
(CEC) deprived in quite illegal way the "Supreme Council – Deputy
Club" public organization of the right of implementing observation
mission during the parliamentary elections to be held on May 12,
2007. Organization Chairman Ruben Torosian made such a statement at
the March 6 press conference. In his words, the organization is called
"Supreme Council – Deputy Club," is written with a dash and does
not remind any state body, particularly, the Supreme Council. When
in the CEC decision the NGO name is written in the following way:
"Supreme Council" deputy club what was qualified by the organization
Chairman as a pervertion of the name. So, in R.Torosian’s words, the
reasoning of the CEC that the NGO name does not correspond to demands
of the RA law "On Public Organizations" (the law prohibits using of
"Supreme Council," "National Assembly," "Government" and other names
of state bodies in names of NGOs) is illegal and baseless. Besides,
as the NGO Chairman mentioned a state body with the "Supreme Council"
name does not exist in Armenia at present.

"Armenian Leadership Should Do Everything For Weakening Consequence

"ARMENIAN LEADERSHIP SHOULD DO EVERYTHING FOR WEAKENING CONSEQUENCES OF BLOW OF U.S. UPON IRAN," POLITICAL SCIENTIST LEVON MELIK-SHAHNAZARIAN DECLARES

Noyan Tapan
Mar 06 2007

YEREVAN, MARCH 6, NOYAN TAPAN. "Today a military blow of U.S. upon Iran
becomes inevitable and the Armenian leadership should do everything
for weakening the consequences of this blow for Armenia, at that, both
domestic and foreign resources should be used." Political scientist
Levon Melik-Shahnazarian, head of De Facto information agency,
declared this at the March 6 press conference. Among possible foreign
resources the political scientist mentioned Armenian lobbying in
U.S. In his words, under the influence of Armenian lobbying U.S. will
try to satisfy Azerbaijan’s possible demand on compensation for its
participation in operation against Iran at the expense of Iran and not
and the expense of Nagorno Karabakh. As regards the military operation
itself, L. Melik-Shahnazarian said that three possible variants of
delivering a blow upon Iran are considered in Washington. The first
two of them are much more real than the third. The first variant
supposes delivering point blows upon strategic entities of Iran,
the second introduction of split into the multi-national society of
Iran, at that, it is not excluded that the factor of Turkish-language
population making 12-16 mln people will be used. The third variant,
in L. Melik-Shahnazarian’s words, is implementation of land operation
against Iran, which is improbable. In the political scientist’s words,
the first variant supposes emerging of "a new Chernobyl" near Armenia
and the second will result in outcome of a great number of people
from Iran. At that, it will be impossible to receive and to accomodate
such a flow of refugees in Armenia being in blockade.