NKR: Getting ready for the South Caucasian film festival

Getting ready for the South Caucasian film festival

06-03-2007 16:19:39 – KarabakhOpen

The Heinrich Boll Foundation and the South Caucasian offices of the
Open Society Fund in Abkhazia, Azerbaijan, Armenia, Georgia, Nagorno
Karabakh and South Ossetia will hold a film festival of peace and
human rights entitled ` Nationality: human’. According to the
coordinator of the project Kerstin Niking, the festival of documentary
films starts in April and will last till October 2007. Over this
period mini festivals will be held throughout the South Caucasus. It
is the first festival in the region, and the purpose of the organizers
is to show real documentary films to the South Caucasian viewer. Since
the world is one, and the language of cinema is clear to everyone, the
Caucasian viewers will identify themselves with people from different
countries of the world, mentally go through and support their struggle
for peace and justice.

The judges of the festival (young film makers and representatives of
NGOs of the South Caucasus, Germany and Czech) have chosen six
documentary films of world level (from Israel, former Yugoslavia,
France and the United States) and made a three-day program. Local
competitions for co-organizers of the festival were announced. Two
festivals will be held in Karabakh, in Stepanakert and in Shushi. A
few days ago a workshop was held in Shushi for the organizers of the
festival in Karabakh, Harmony NGO and the Civic Action Center.
According to the participants of the meeting, two days of workshop
were highly useful and important.

Karineh Ohanyan, journalist, who is one of the judges of the festival,
told KarabakhOpen.com that the festival will arrive in Karabakh in
October. Everyone is welcome to watch and discuss films about peace
and human rights for three days in Stepanakert and for another three
days in Shushi.

Turkey blocks access to YouTube

Los Angeles Times, CA
March 8 2007

Turkey blocks access to YouTube

A court rules that clips about the nation’s revered modern-day
founder are an insult.
By Laura King and Dawn C. Chmielewski, Times Staff Writers
March 8, 2007

ISTANBUL, Turkey – Looking to check out the latest videos of
cavorting kittens and lovelorn lip-synchers on YouTube? If you live
in Turkey, you’re out of luck.

After receiving a court order, Turkey’s largest telecommunications
provider Wednesday blocked access to the popular video-sharing
website because it featured clips that were seen as insulting to
Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, the founder of modern Turkey.

The censorship is evidence of YouTube’s growing social and political
resonance. It also marks the latest battle between Web titans such as
YouTube’s corporate parent, Google Inc., and foreign governments over
free speech on the Internet as the companies expand into new markets.

YouTube and other technologies that allow users to share information
"shift power away from central institutions to communities,"
Forrester Research analyst Charlene Li said. "Whenever you hold a lot
of power, you’re very threatened when that power is taken away from
you. That’s what the Internet does, and that is what YouTube is
doing."

An Istanbul court ordered the YouTube ban, acting on a prosecutor’s
recommendation. In Turkey, it is a crime punishable by imprisonment
to denigrate "Turkishness" or Ataturk, and the statute is sometimes
used to prosecute those who criticize official government policy on a
wide range of sensitive issues.

Within hours, visitors signing on to the site from Turkey were
greeted with a message in Turkish and English saying that access to
the site had been suspended in accordance with the court decision.

Turk Telekom, which has a near-monopoly on Internet access in this
country of 70 million people, took no position on whether the video
clips in question in fact denigrated Ataturk, a revered figure here.

"We are not in the position of saying that what YouTube did was an
insult, that it was right or wrong," Paul Doany, chairman of Turk
Telekom, told the state-run Anatolia news agency. "A court decision
was proposed to us, and we are doing what that court decision says."

YouTube issued a statement expressing disappointment in the Turkish
government’s ban.

"The Internet is an international phenomenon, and while technology
can bring great opportunity and access to information globally, it
can also present new and unique cultural challenges," YouTube said.
"We respect the authorities in Turkey and are committed to working
with them to resolve this."

Google, which bought YouTube in November for $1.65 billion, drew
criticism last year for acceding to the Chinese government’s demands
that the company block Web searches for material about Taiwan, Tibet,
democracy and other sensitive issues.

Yahoo Inc. also was attacked for providing information that helped
the Chinese government identify a journalist who was later sentenced
to 10 years in prison on charges of e-mailing state secrets.

YouTube is only 2 years old, but its growing popularity across the
globe has resulted in spats with governments. A Brazilian judge in
January banned access to YouTube from that country because of a
steamy video involving supermodel Daniela Cicarelli and her
boyfriend, a Brazilian banker. The ban was lifted after YouTube
removed the video. The state of Victoria in Australia ordered YouTube
blocked from 1,600 government schools after a gang of male students
used it to circulate their videotaped assault on a 17-year-old girl.

Access to YouTube, with its pop-culture zeitgeist, might not seem
like an important fundamental right. But in Turkey, freedom of
expression is an explosive issue – one that has shadowed the
government’s push to gain membership in the European Union.

The national taboo on freewheeling debate took a lethal turn in
January, when newspaper editor Hrant Dink, who had campaigned for
Turkey to acknowledge that the deaths of millions of Armenians
beginning in 1915 constituted a genocide, was gunned down in daylight
outside the offices of his bilingual weekly newspaper.

Turkish journalist Metin Muner called the YouTube ban "seriously
worrying" in light of the slaying and continuing restrictions on free
speech.

"This is perhaps the beginning of something very unpleasant," said
Muner, who writes for the nationally circulated Milliyet newspaper.

The flap showed how even an entertainment-oriented site such as
YouTube could become a platform for the airing of historical grudges
and grievances. Turkish media reported that in recent days, Greek and
Turkish nationalists had been posting inflammatory competing videos
on the site.

The Hurriyet newspaper reported Wednesday that YouTube had received
tens of thousands of e-mails protesting the depiction of Ataturk as a
homosexual, and that the video clips in question had been removed.

Doany of Turk Telekom said access to the site would be restored if
the court ruling was rescinded.

Armenian church to hold monthly service

Press-Enterprise , CA
March 8 2007

Armenian church to hold monthly service

The Armenian Apostolic Church of Riverside will hold its monthly
service of Holy Badarak, the church’s central worship service, at
1:30 p.m. Sunday at All Saints Episcopal Church, 3847 Terracina
Drive, Riverside.

A program about Katchkars, the cross stones used to symbolize the
Armenian people at the United Nations, will follow the service.

The church serves Armenians in Riverside and San Bernardino counties.

Information: 909-883-1066 or 951-684-1722.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

NKR: Developments in Iran Worry Karabakh

Developments in Iran Worry Karabakh

02-03-2007 13:11:06 – KarabakhOpen

The recent developments in Iran worry Karabakh which has an extended
border with Iran. Does Karabakh track the developments related to the
Iranian issue and what consequences they might have for Karabakh?

KarabakhOpen.com asked this question to Vahram Atanesyan, chair of the
Committee of External Relations.

For this issue, I think even in Iran they are not well-informed. I
mean no one in Iran can tell if the U.S. will attack or will only make
threats. In any case, the Islamic regime in Iran will not be against
negotiations with the United States if the White House makes a
negotiation effort, which would also prefer a peace settlement of the
problem, and is most probably waiting until Iran loses its nerve. I do
not think the United States will use force to untie the Iranian
knot. It is possible that the U.N. will apply economic and political
sanctions against Iran, which will not be used at full for separate
reasons.

I think it is not right to say that the developments in Iran will have
direct influence on the Karabakh settlement. The settlement would be
affected by the recent close ties between Azerbaijan and European
states related to the spread of the Azerbaijani energy towards Europe,
as well as the visible close relations between NATO and Azerbaijan
rather. Russia’s aspirations for engagement in Azerbaijan’s energy
projects cause more worries.

Answering KarabakhOpen.com question, the head of the political
department of the NKR MFA Irina Beglaryan said:

Certainly, the NKR government and people track the developments
related to Iran’s nuclear program. Iran is our neighbor, moreover, it
is one of the few friendly states in the region, so no possible
negative development is in the interests of Nagorno-Karabakh
Republic. We believe that the Iranian government and the international
community will make sufficient efforts for a peace settlement of the
problem through consultations and cooperation over working out a
decision which will be acceptable for both.

– The Armenian and Iranian relations develop by an interesting
scenario. On the one hand, both Iran and Armenia are Russia’s
allies. On the other hand, Iran is believed to be the opponent of the
United States, which is the greatest partner of Armenia. Yet Iran is
the only country, which enables Armenia to diversify its sources and
transportation of energy. There is no alternative to the friendly
relations between Iran and Armenia, and even the U.S., striving for
economic sanctions against the Iranian regime, cannot offer anything
better to Armenia.

For Nagorno Karabakh, Iran is the only non-hostile country. The
extended border practically does not work, and trade between Iran and
Karabakh takes place via Armenia, which is not lucrative. One of the
main Iranian products widely consumed in both Armenia and Karabakh is
bitumen. With high rates of road building in both Armenian states this
product is highly demanded. Levon Abrahamyan, the president of the
Iran-Armenia Trade Chamber told the news reporter of A1+ that there
are no political problems for importing bitumen to Armenia.

`During the visit of President Kocharyan to Iran agreement was reached
on supplying 20 thousand tons of bitumen to Armenia through the
embassy. Iran does not have problems with supplying bitumen to
Armenia, the problem is the production capacity, and our bitumen is
exported even to Vietnam,’ said the Iranian entrepreneur. Lavon
Abrahamyan and 25 other Iranian entrepreneurs took part in the
Iran-Armenia Trade Forum. The head of the group, the Iranian deputy
minister of trade Babak Afgayi informed his Armenian colleagues that
his country is likely to sell off a number of state enterprises,
including banks, insurance companies. In other words, moves are made
towards market economy. Thereby the Iranian official made an
interesting offer to the Armenian investors.

Apparently, Iran is likely to promote relations with Armenia. The
evidence to this is that during the meeting of the Armenian defense
minister Serge Sargsyan and the Iranian ambassador to Armenia Ali Reza
Hakikian the timing of the upcoming visit of the head of the Iranian
Supreme Council for National Security Ali Larijani to Armenia was
discussed. Considering that Ali Larijani is one of the authoritative
persons in his country, we should expect a turnaround in the
geo-strategic situation in the region.

– /PanARMENIAN.Net/ The American Army can strike on Iran till April of
this year, reported Kuwaiti newspaper The Arab Times appealing to
informed sources. According to it, the U.S. attack will be launched
from sea with the support of anti-missile defense System `Patriot’. It
will allow the U.S. not to jeopardize its army and to restrain any
possibility for reaction from any country in the Persian Gulf. `The
American forces in Iraq and other countries of the region will be
protected from any Iranian missile strike with the help of advanced
missile system `Patriot’,’ told the source the Arab Times, Newsru.com
reports. The main targets will become objects of oil and nuclear
industries. The U.S. and its allies guarantee the new military
campaign in Middle East will not result in ecological catastrophe in
the region. According to the source, the United States has chosen
April, since the British Prime Minister Tony Bleer told, it will be
his last month in the post. `The U.S.A. must take measures towards
Iran and Syria till April of 2007,’ cites the publication the words of
Bleer. Washington has already launched preparations for the possible
strike on Iran. Currently several warships have been sent to the
Persian Gul f and several will be sent till the end of the month.

As was reported earlier, like in Iraq, as a cause for military actions
in Iran will serve nuclear weapons, though they will be limited with
strikes on some military factories. According to the source, the Bush
Administration supposes that after overthrowing the Iranian regime a
new balance of forces can be established in the region. Thus, the
American authorities think that it will calm down the situation in
Iraq and will promote the democratic process in the country.

In his part, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadi Nejad stated the U.S.A.
will not have courage to attack Iran.

– PanARMENIAN.Net/ American troops are concentrating near the Persian
Gulf, which arouses anxiety of possible military actions by the
U.S. against Iran. More and more American tankers are making for the
Persian Gulf. Two aircraft-carrier groups and marines landing warships
arrived to the region. `Patriot’ anti-aircraft missiles are
transported to Kuwait, most probably for the fight against Iranian
aviation, the BBC Russian service reports.

Pentagon specialist on military planning Sam Gardner said that signs
of preparing a massive military operation are evident. `The United
States is on the way to strike Iran. All necessary elements are being
deployed on battle positions. I don’t think that final decision to
strike Iran is made, though. We see either preparations for such a
decision, or efforts to intimidate Iranians,’ he said.

Analysts say that by doing this Washington tries to make Tehran stop
interference practice in Iraq, because of which, as the U.S. leaders
think, American soldiers die there every day. The U.S. also wants to
make Iran refuse from efforts to produce nuclear weapons. In his part
Tehran categorically rejects all accusations, insisting that Iran has
no relations to what is going on in Iraq and that his nuclear program
is exclusively of peace character.

New Yorker weekly corespondent Seymour Hersh says that the
U.S. Pentagon has set up a special planning group to coordinate
possible attacks on Iran. Hersh, quoting unnamed sources, added that
the group would plan raids to be carried out within 24 hours of a
presidential order for military action. The article also says that
covert intelligence-gathering inside Iran had been stepped up in
recent months, with special operations groups entering from Iraq to
pursue Iranians suspected of working against US interests. An
administration representative immediately denied all results of this
journalistic investigation. But Senate Armed Services Committee member
Carl Levin insists on holding hearings in this regard. He said that
suppositions in the article that the U.S. administration is planning
various secret operations in the Middle East without informing the
Congress are extremely anxious.

Nevertheless, observers in the United States are sure that the
American army that has stuck in Iraq and Afghanistan is not capable to
launch military operations in one more country, and the war against
Iran will not become a reality.

– At Resource Center NGO of Stepanakert a round-table meeting on the
connection between the Karabakh settlement and the U.S. ` Iranian
relations took place. The administrator of Resource Center Irina
Grigoryan says `there are too many geo-strategic factors around
Karabakh, therefore it is hard to imagine settlement outside the
regional context.’

The political scientist Davit Babayan told about the situation in
Iran. He emphasized that the actions of the United States with regard
to Iran are determined by the wish to neutralize potential opponents
aspiring to world rule, and first of all China. And Iran is the `best’
path leading to Central Asia and China. Besides, Iran threatens the
U.S. monopoly in terms of political stability, as well as oil and gas
resources and impact on the environment.

The armed conflict between the U.S. and Iran is not favorable for the
Armenian party for several reasons, Davit Babayan says. First, because
Iran borders with Karabakh. Second, the interested parties may use the
opportunity and take anti-Armenian steps. According to the political
scientist, the anti-Iranian forces will hardly wish to use the
territory of Karabakh to intrude into Iran, at least because the
border between the two countries passes along a rather wide river
without bridges.

Serge Amirkhanyan, ARF Dashnaktsutyun, said in the round-table meeting
that 13 ethnicities live in Iran. In addition, Persians are not a
majority. There were separatist movements in Iran, which were severely
repressed, however, namely when the USSR claimed to North Iran.

According to Serge Amirkhanyan, Karabakh missed the moment to set up
relations with Iran. Mr. Amirkhanyan, who grew up in Iran, says it
would be expedient to open the border for trade between the Iranian
and Karabakh villages situated near the border. This would be mutually
favorable, both politically and economically. Especially, that there
is a special attitude towards Armenians in Iran. In Iran the Armenian
language is taught at schools as a foreign language. The
representatives of all the other ethnicities study in Persian only.

It was mentioned during the round-table meeting that the first
official delegation to visit Karabakh in 1992 immediately after the
declaration of independence was the Iranian delegation headed by the
deputy minister of foreign affairs of Iran.

The participants of the round-table concluded that the delay in the
settlement of the Karabakh conflict is not connected with the Iranian
issue, although the U.S. ` Iranian controversies could be used by
Azerbaijan to reach its goals.

– On the initiative of the Nagorno Karabakh Republic Ministry of
Territorial Management and Development of Industrial Infrastructures,
the Artsakh Development Agency and Public organization of businessmen
and merchants of Iran in Armenia, a group of businessmen and
manufacturers from Iran paid a two-day visit to Stepanakert.

A number of issues of mutual interest were discussed in the course of
the forum conducted in the building of the NKR Government. In
particular, variants of import of raw materials and corresponding
equipment were discussed. It was decided also to organize an
exposition of Iranian goods in the NKR in future.

The Iranian businessmen visited a number of industrial enterprises of
the republic, got acquainted with the production of local businessmen,
showed interest in the tax field and breaks established for foreign
investors.

«The visit of the Iranian delegation to the Nagorno Karabakh
Republic is a new step in the way of deepening of the cooperation, –
NKR Prime-Minister Anoushavan Daniyelian stated commenting on the
forum in Stepanakert. ` The secular friendship of the two peoples is
still deeply rooted which is manifested both in various spheres of
economy and in the spheres of science, education and culture. These
ties are being consistently strengthened».

The Head of the Cabinet of Ministers presented also the achievements
in the republic’s economy noting the favourable conditions created by
the NKR for stimulating foreign investments.

On behalf of the NKR Government Anoushavan Daniyelian expressed
readiness to render necessary assistance to the Iranian businessmen in
implementation of their programs in Nagorno Karabakh.

A criminal act exposes Turkish genocide

NYU Washington Square News, NY
March 8 2007

A criminal act exposes Turkish genocide
Christina Clare
Issue date: 3/8/07 Section: Features

In 2006, Turkish author Elif Shafak was accused of and tried for
violating Article 301 of the Turkish Penal Code, which makes it a
crime to engage in "public denigration of Turkishness." One of the
gravest ways to do this is to acknowledge and identify the Armenian
genocide that took place under Ottoman rule between 1915 and 1917.
Shafak does this artfully in her recent novel, "The Bastard of
Istanbul," in which she explores the interaction of two families, one
Turkish and the other Armenian, joined together by marriage.

The characters’ use of the word "genocide" is what landed Shafak in
court. According to the Turkish government, the mass deportation and
killing of an estimated 1.5 million Turkish Armenians was a
consequence of World War I, rather than the result of a concentrated
effort by those in power to eliminate a whole population. Despite the
censure of the denial of this event by the international community,
the Turkish government still adheres to this position and persecutes
those within its country who contradict them.

The "Bastard of Istanbul" is Shafak’s vehicle to draw the world’s
attention to the Armenian genocide so vigorously denied by her
country.

Shafak has a sharp and colorful knack for description. There is a
character with "the most blatantly aquiline nose, of which there were
only two others in world history – Sultan Mehmed the Conqueror’s and
Auntie Zeliha’s." Then there is the Dipsomatic Cartoonist, a
painfully jaded man in a lackluster marriage, experiencing so much
emotional turmoil that "even his wife" could sympathize. And then
there is Rose, an American who, while dealing with her divorce from
an Armenian man, meets the Turkish Mustafa and pursues him simply to
spite her staunchly anti-Turk in-laws.

Rose’s daughter, Armanoush, grows up in Arizona with her mother and
Turkish stepfather. She frequently visits her biological father in
San Francisco, where his psychologically scarred family educates her
about her Armenian heritage and the genocide her people suffered at
the hands of the Turks. Armanoush is very affected by what she is
told, so at age 21, unbeknownst to her family, she travels to Turkey
to try to understand her Turkish-Armenian identities. She meets and
stays with her stepfather’s family, the Kazancis.

The story centers around the women of the multigenerational Kazanci
family in Istanbul. This Turkish family represents the old and the
new of the country’s politics.

There is the clairvoyant Auntie Banu, who wears a headscarf that her
mother and sisters find offensive because it speaks of the past
suppression of women, abolished decades earlier by Ataturk. In stark
contrast is her sister, Zeliha, a provocatively dressed, rebellious
tattoo artist, who swears habitually and gives birth to the "the
bastard of Istanbul" at age 19. The mentally ill Aunt Ferida is
described as changing her hair color so much, "at each stage of her
journey to insanity," that her doctors even kept a hair chart "to
follow the changes in her psychology." Cevriye is "a humorless
history teacher with a Spartan sense of discipline and self-control"
who "crusaded against impulsiveness, disruption and spontaneity at
home."

These women form the crucible within which the action in Istanbul
occurs.

The Turkey that Armanoush finds in her search for identity is
described by the Dipsomaniac Cartoonist at a weekly meeting with his
cynical intellectual friends at the Kundera café¼This man, undergoing
prosecution by the government for the content of his work, laments
the sociopolitical climate of Turkey.

"We are stuck between the East and the West," he says. "On the one
hand, there are the secular modernists, so proud of the regime they
constructed, you cannot breathe a critical word. They’ve got the army
and half the state on their side. On the other hand there are the
conventional traditionalists, so infatuated with the Ottoman past,
you cannot breathe a critical word. They’ve got the general public
and the remaining half of the state on their side. What is left for
us?"

The title character, 19-year-old Asya, notes, "My family is a bunch
of clean freaks. … They always talk about the past, but it is a
cleansed version of the past. … Every day we swallow yet another
capsule of mendacity." These kinds of politically charged statements
prompted the Turkish government to prosecute Shafak.

Asya family, as a microcosm of Turkey, exemplifies the country’s
stance on the Armenian genocide. Through her travels, Armanoush
pushes her Turkish stepfamily to address what her country really did
to her people, in this highly enjoyable, elucidative novel.

/paper869/news/2007/03/08/Features/A.Criminal.Act. Exposes.Turkish.Genocide-2764391.shtml

http://media.www.nyunews.com/media/storage

Turkish official defends World War I actions of Ottoman Empire

Diamondback Online, MD
March 8 2007

Turkish official defends World War I actions of Ottoman Empire

Mark Cullip
Issue date: 3/8/07 Section: News

PrintEmail Article Tools Page 1 of 1 Minister Councilor of Turkey,
Tuluy Tanc, discussed the 1915 Armenian "genocide" and the status of
free press in Turkey during an event last night in Hillel.

Tanc defended Turkey’s role in the killing and relocation of
Armenians, during the Ottoman Empire’s involvement in World War I
from 1915 to 1917. His remarks come amidst an expected vote next
month by the U.S. House of Representatives on a non-binding
resolution to refer to the Ottoman Empire’s actions as genocide.

During World War I, 200,000 Armenians were killed, but that’s much
less than the 2.5 million Turks who were killed during the war, Tanc
said. Many estimate the Armenian death toll surpassed 1 million.

"What happened to the Armenians was a tragedy, but not genocide,"
Tanc said to an audience of about 40 people hosted by the Pro-Israel
Terrapin Alliance and the Turkish Student Association. "If the Turks
had committed genocide would there have been two Armenian ministers
in the Ottoman government?"

Tanc suggested Congress’ resolution would have serious implications.

"If the resolution passes, Turks cannot ‘shrug it off,’" Tanc said,
quoting the advice given to the Turkish government by columnist
Jackson Diehl in Monday’s Washington Post. "It will hang like a black
cloud over Turkish-American relations," Tanc said.

The lecture focused on another important in issue in Turkey: free
press.

"Freedom of the press in Turkey is pretty strong-unless you say
something bad about Turkey," Tanc said. Article 301, the Turkish law
against insulting the country, is vague, and was done in a move to
preserve "Turkishness." "The parliament is trying to change it, so is
academia. The Prime Minister says it will be changed."

The Turkish Student Association hopes to continue the Armenian debate
at the University of Maryland, President Rachel Salomon said, with a
possible event held at Maryland with Turkish groups from George
Washington and Catholic universities.

The president of Pro-Israel Terrapin Alliance, Avi Mayer, called the
event "tremendously instructive."

Ambassador Tanc is Turkey’s former Deputy Permanent Representative to
the United Nations and has been actively involved in the formulation
and implementation of Turkish foreign policy for thirty years, an
event flyer said.

ANKARA: In wake of Dink murder, print media pays heavy price for…

Today’s Zaman, Turkey
March 8 2007

In wake of Hrant Dink murder, print media pays heavy price for
coverage

The 18-year-old suspected murderer of Turkish Armenian journalist
Hrant Dink, O.S. of Trabzon, has turned out to be a
bigger-than-expected headache for Turkish newspapers.

Many newspapers in Turkey are now facing stiff fines in the wake of
Dink’s mid-January murder for breaking the press rule of `not
disclosing the identities of those under 18 years of age.’
Prosecutors have demanded fines of up to YTL 100,000 from newspapers
that broke the `under 18′ rule, and reports are that if the money is
not paid within 10 days, the fines will increase. While the Turkish
Press Council complains that `the media is paying the price for the
Dink murder,’ the Journalists’ Association is pointing at what they
say is a double standard for newspapers compared to television
stations, noting that although Dink’s alleged murderer, O.S.,
received plenty of exposure on television, there have been no fines
meted out to television stations. A prosecutor working on the O.S.
case revealed recently in a press conference that the fines for the
Zaman newspaper in the Dink case would be more than YTL 100,000.

Journalist Oktay Ekþi, the chairman of the Turkish Press Council, has
asserted that it is the print media that is being saddled with the
bill following Dink’s murder, noting that he is against the tens of
thousands of fines dealt out to newspapers for each photograph and
article that broke the `under 18 criminal suspect’ rule. Eksi said
that prosecutors, instead of pursuing those responsible for the Dink
murder, have given orders for various newspapers to pay fines, and
that these fines have had a silencing effect on the 67 large and 900
local newspapers in Turkey, as well as on the nearly 20 news agencies
across in the country.

Ekþi also underlined that the printed press was not the first to
disclose Dink’s murderer’s identity to Turkey, recalling that on Jan.
21, 2007, the police had made O.S.’s name public, while a little
while later, the Ýstanbul governor, Ýstanbul police chief, the Samsun
governor and the Samsun police chief also revealed O.S.’s name and
identity once again. Ekþi also asserted that in the first days
following the murder, O.S.’s age had not yet been determined and that
most people in Turkey received their initial information about O.S.
and his actions from television.

Managing Editor of Hürriyet daily Tufan Türenç asserts that the
disclosure of Hrant Dink’s murderer’s identity should not have
brought up questions about press principles, saying: `There is no
reason for hiding names in this situation. Images of the killer were
openly broadcast to help bring about his capture. His name was
disclosed. Thanks to the broadcast images, he was caught. Would his
father have been able to identify him if something had prevented the
broadcast of these images? This is not a matter of principles. I
think the decision to reveal his name was the right one.’

The chairman of the Turkish Journalists’ Association, Orhan Erinç,
agrees that in principle, the names of criminal suspects under the
age of 18 should not be revealed in the printed press but notes that
since all of Turkey already knew O.S.’s identity, due to public
disclosures by high level government authorities, there was no logic
in this principle. Erinç also points to the contradictions inherent
in the fines which have been leveraged against the print media,
saying `When you make a disclosure on television it’s not a crime,
but when you write it in a newspaper, it’s a crime.’

Authorities at the Istanbul chief prosecutor’s bureau have agreed
that due to the massive outcry sparked by the Dink murder, as well as
to the fact that the identity of Dink’s murderer was known by `all of
Turkey,’ the rules of secrecy which would normally apply in a case
like this do not apply to the ongoing investigation into this case.
It was following the arrival of a state-appointed defense lawyer for
Dink murderer O.S. that the request was made to republic prosecutors
to bring about strictures on Turkish newspaper and television
coverage of the identity and images of the murderer.

08.03.2007

BÜÞRA ERDAL ÝSTANBUL

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

ANKARA: Israeli businessmen: We have to hide to trade in Turkey

Today’s Zaman, Turkey
March 8 2007

Israeli businessmen: We have to hide to trade in Turkey

Israeli businessmen said during a Turkey-Israel joint economic
council meeting on Wednesday that certain companies with Jewish
capital had to conceal their actual identities to operate in Turkey
because of anti-Semitic sentiment.

Turkish State Minister for Foreign Trade Kürþat Tüzmen, however,
denied this claim and said there were many Israeli companies trading
in Turkey and that discrimination against Jewish capital was out of
question.

Israeli businessmen expressed their complaints at the meeting,
attended by a Tüzmen-led delegation of Turkish businessmen.

Tüzmen responded to reporters’ questions regarding the issue during a
visit to Masjid al-Aqsa and the Dome of the Rock. Tüzmen stated that
Turks’ tolerance toward Jews was well known and added that Israeli
businessmen were not discriminated against. He noted that Jewish
investors had major representatives in Turkey.

`Jewish businessmen occupy a significant position in Turkey.
Discrimination against them is out of question,’ he said.

Tüzmen also noted that Israeli businessmen had expressed their
support for Turkey regarding a Armenian genocide resolution presented
to the US House of Representatives. The clout of the Jewish lobby in
the US is well known, Tüzmen said. `They expressed significant
support,’ he said.

`We are sensitive about Harem al-Sharif’

Tüzmen said while visiting the Al-Aqsa Mosque that a review board
would go to Jerusalem to make assessments on construction of a bridge
at Harem al-Sharif (Noble Sanctuary). He said Turkish Ambassador to
Israel Namýk Tan was the one pursuing the issue. Tüzmen underlined
the sensitivity in the Islamic world over the issue. Tüzmen also
visited the Kubbet el-Sahra Mosque and prayed there.

08.03.2007

Hüseyin Sümer Jerusalem

ANKARA: Tuzmen seeks Israeli support

The New Anatolian, Turkey
March 8 2007

Tuzmen seeks Israeli support

Oznur Cevik – The New Anatolian / Jerusalem
08 March 2007

State Minister Kursad Tuzmen, who went to Israel for the
Turkey-Israel third Joint Economic Committee (JEC) meeting and to
boost bilateral trade and economic relations, yesterday visited the
Dome of the Rock and Al-Aksa.

Tuzmen, accompanied by Turkish businessmen, was welcomed by Abdulazim
El Azim Selhab, who complained about the restrictions on mosque
visits for Palestinians and Muslims saying, "You can visit the mosque
coming from Turkey but those who live out of Jerusalem face
difficulties."

Selhab thanked the Turkish government for their efforts regarding the
mosque and praised Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s attitude
towards the excavations during Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert’s
visit last month.

Some 40 Turkish companies are taking part in the business delegation.
Sectors represented include food, furniture, logistics, jewelry,
software, packaging, building materials, giftware, leather, textiles
and clothing.

Tuzmen praised the efforts of Turkish businessmen working in Israel,
describing them as "envoys that have built a bridge between two
countries."

On the current claims about anti-Jewish sentiment in Turkey, Tuzmen
said, "There might be some shallow anti-Semitic ideas, but there are
180 Israeli firms working in Turkey. There hasn’t been any attitude
change against Jewish people in Turkey. We are the grandsons of
Ottomans and 48 countries were born from the Ottomans. We have lived
in peace for hundreds of years."

Armenian genocide resolution

On his request from Israeli businessmen for support against the
Armenian genocide resolution, Tuzmen said, "The Jewish lobby in the
U.S. is strong and we sought their support. They promised to support
our case." Tuzmen said, "We are doing our best to prevent the world
from accepting a lie which has been repeated over and over again."

Key to preserving Armenian ethnicity

Gulf News, United Arab Emirates
March 8 2007

Key to preserving Armenian ethnicity
By Jumana Al Tamimi, GCC and Middle East Editor

Dubai: When Vera and her three brothers and sisters were very young,
their father longed for his children and Syrian Orthodox wife to
learn how to speak his mother tongue -Armenian.

His wish came true and Vera became actively involved in preserving
the Armenian identity of her ancestors, not just their language.

"My mother started learning Armenian with us, and taught it to us
afterwards," said Vera Yacoubian, the Executive Director of the
Armenian National Committee in the Middle East.

"The Armenian language is essential to keep the identity
[alive]…The foundation is to preserve our traditions and heritage,"
she told Gulf News.

However, "Learning our language doesn’t mean we don’t learn other
languages. Later, we learned Arabic and English," she added.

Protecting their Armenian ethnicity is essential, wherever they
choose to live. "But our loyalty is to the country we come from in
the first place," Yacoubian said.

"We came from the Orient and we don’t want our roots to be extracted
from a region we belong to since the fifth and sixth centuries," she
added. Armenians pride themselves for having the oldest church in
Mosel in northern Iraq.

Yacoubian, in her early forties, holds a bachelor’s degree in mass
communication from the Lebanese University. Apart from working in the
media, she taught Arabic for eight years, and worked as an adviser to
the Lebanese youth minister before joining the Beirut-based Armenian
committee, which was formed in 2005.

Besides Beirut, committees are also based in Washington, Brussels,
Moscow and the Armenian capital, Yerevan, that aim to preserve the
ethnicity of their communities.

"We are an artistic people," she said in reference to Armenians
excelling in several professions and in arts and crafts, such as
sculpture, ceramics and painting.

"Our presence is peaceful. We don’t have political aims. All we are
seeking to do is to spread awareness of our identity and history."

And, Yacoubian added, the "most important issue in the life of each
Armenian" is the genocide of 1.5 million Armenians killed by the
Ottoman Turks during the years 1915-1923, through systematic
massacres and starvation.

Turkey denies there was a genocide. While it acknowledges the death
of many Armenians, it adds the figure is below one million.

Until recently, Turks considered the issue of the genocide as a
"taboo" subject. Armenians insist on getting the Turkish government
to acknowledge what happened as "genocide."

Today, nearly three million Armenians live in Armenia, and five
million others live among the diaspora. At the same time, they are
part of the Arab population in several countries, including Lebanon,
Iran, Syria, Egypt, Iraq and Jordan. As Yacoubian puts it, "We are
Arab citizens with Armenian roots."

e_East/10109608.html

http://www.gulfnews.com/region/Middl