Ghougasyan Doesn’t Share The Co-Chairs’ Stance

GHOUKASYAN DOESN’T SHARE THE CO-CHAIRS’ STANCE

A1+
[08:41 pm] 12 March, 2007

more images "One shouldn’t start the construction of a building from
the roof", Bernard Fassier, OSCE Minsk group French Co-Chair announced
in Yerevan in answer to the question on the return of refugees to
the NKR.

To note, Bernard Fassier arrived in Yerevan from Baku.

He held a meeting with RA FM Vardan Oskanyan and NKR President Vardan
Oskanyan.

Fassier’s visit was aimed at informing the Armenian side on the recent
agreements and to consider preparations of the Geneva meeting of the
Armenian and Azeri FMs.

"On the whole, the meetings were efficient. I voice hope that the
upcoming meeting of the two foreign ministers will be constructive,"
said the French Co-Chair.

While speaking of the refugees’ return, Bernard Fassier said, "The
return of refugees is a rather complicated and important issue. The
countries under question must thoroughly prepare for it."

"Roof, sewerage, energy must be provided prior to the return of
refugees. Besides, it is necessary to ensure the refugees’ security. It
is too early to speak of the matter today lest all the conditions
are guaranteed", announced Mr. Fassier.

Fassier highlighted the engagement of Karabakh in the procedure. It
was decided to make the meetings more frequent.

Fassier also represented the stance of the OSCE Minsk group Co-Chairs
on the Karabakh conflict settlement but Arkadi Ghoukasyan didn’t
share it fully.

On March 13, Bernard Fassier will meet with the OSCE Minsk group
Russian and U.S. Co-Chairs to inform them on the results of his
meetings.

Proces Perincek: Condamne Pour Negation Du Genocide Armenien

PROCÈS PERINCEK. CONDAMNE POUR NEGATION DU GENOCIDE ARMENIEN

Le Matin, France
12 mars 2007 lundi
Edition Semaine

"Ignoble Suisse";
Molnar

ANKARAL’ambassadeur et la presse turcs se dechaînent contre les medias
helvetiques accuses de partialite dans cette affaire

L’ambassadeur de Turquie en Suisse critique a son tour le jugement
rendu vendredi a Lausanne contre Dogu Perincek. Dans une interview
publiee hier par la "NZZ am Sonntag", Alev Kilic deplore les
consequences futures de cette decision.

Selon l’ambassadeur, le verdict lausannois signifie que l’on ne peut
plus discuter de manière ouverte en Suisse. "C’est aussi valable pour
les 100 000 Turcs qui vivent dans le pays", note au passage M.

Killic. "La Turquie ne pourra simplement plus exprimer son point de
vue", a-t-il ajoute.

Samedi, la presse nationaliste turque s’etait montree beaucoup
plus critique a l’egard du jugement lausannois. "Ignoble Suisse",
a titre en couverture le quotidien Gozcu, pour qui le jugement est
une nouvelle preuve d’hypocrisie: "l’Europe insiste toujours sur la
liberte d’expression, mais sanctionne pourtant une opinion".

Meme indignation dans le quotidien de droite Yeni Cag: "la nation
turque est punie en la personne de Perincek", peut-on y lire. Le
tribunal lausannois s’est montre "plein de haine", selon le journal.

k"Opinions historiques"

La presse bourgeoise s’est aussi attardee sur le sujet, mais de
manière moins polemique. Le journal Hurriyet a choisi de citer les
mots de Dogu Perincek lui-meme, pour qui "le procès a lance en Suisse
un debat sur la criminalisation des opinions historiques".

De retour en Turquie, Dogu Perincek a appele les personnalites de
son pays a se rendre en Suisse et a y nier le genocide armenien. Le
nationaliste a ete accueilli samedi a l’aeroport d’Istanbul par
ses partisans. Selon lui, son procès a ete "digne de l’Inquisition
espagnole".

Le jugement rendu a Lausanne n’est pas definitif, a-t-il ajoute, car
il fera appel. Vendredi, après l’enonce du verdict, Dogu Perincek
a declare qu’il etait pret a aller jusqu’a la Cour europeenne des
droits de l’homme a Strasbourg.

–Boundary_(ID_57OxRL3UlS5SjXPxkYlY1Q )–

Our Turn : Turkey Hits Free Speech (Again)

OUR TURN : TURKEY HITS FREE SPEECH (AGAIN)

San Antonio Express-News
STATE&METRO Edition
March 10, 2007 Saturday

Continuing a troubling tradition of censorship, a Turkish court this
week banned access to YouTube because the Web site had a video clip
deemed insulting to Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, founder of the Turkish
Republic.

Ataturk, who died in 1938, is highly revered in Turkey, where he
helped birth economic, political and social reform.

The clip allegedly portrays Ataturk and other Turks as gay. The
charge falls squarely under Article 301 of the Turkish Constitution,
which makes it illegal to criticize "Turkishness."

Turk Telekom, the country’s primary provider of telecommunications
services, agreed to the court’s blockage.

Article 301 has been used to charge novelists and journalists in
court. One outspoken newspaper editor, Hrant Dink, was fatally
shot outside his office in January. Many connect the murder to his
characterization of the 1915 mass killing of Armenians by Ottoman
forces as "genocide."

At a time when Turkey hopes to gain entry into the European Union,
its record on freedom of expression is becoming increasingly dismal.

An editorial in Turkey’s Hurriyet newspaper Friday stated it well:
"Our societal inclination towards getting angry fast makes us forget
this important truth: Sometimes, ignoring something can be the best
punishment possible!"

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Book: The Knock At The Door: A Journey Through The Darkness Of The A

THE KNOCK AT THE DOOR: A JOURNEY THROUGH THE DARKNESS OF THE ARMENIAN GENOCIDE

Publishers Weekly Reviews
March 5, 2007

The Knock at the Door: A Journey Through the Darkness of the
Armenian Genocide Margaret Ajemian Ahnert. Beaufort, $24.95 (240p)
ISBN 978-0-8253-0512-2

This personal, homespun account by an American of Armenian descent
interweaves two narratives in alternating chapters: Ahnert’s
mother Ester’s firsthand description of coming-of-age during, and
miraculously surviving, the Turkish-sponsored Armenian genocide of
1915, and the middle-aged author’s own tender yet urgent reflections
on her connection to the distant world of her 98-year-old mother.

Ester’s formidable personality, humor and abiding religious faith
pervade Ahnert’s debut, while the latter’s fluid transcription of
Ester’s story provides a frank and searing testimony, as well as
a vivid depiction of Armenian village life. While Ahnert’s oral
history doesn’t offer a rigorous historical account or analysis of
the systematic slaughter, but rather supplements works like Peter
Balakian’s The Burning Tigris and Taner Akcam’s A Shameful Act ,
its force lies in the interplay between the narratives of mother and
daughter. Together, their stories realize in intimate but accessible
terms the vagaries of historical memory and Ester’s determination to
tell the truth despite the understandable urge among some victims to
forget in the face of an official policy of denial from Turkey that
continues today.. (Apr.).

Book: ‘Bastard Of Istanbul’ Explores Multi-Cultural, Multi-Generatio

‘BASTARD OF ISTANBUL’ EXPLORES MULTI-CULTURAL, MULTI-GENERATION RELATIONSHIPS
By Christina Clare, Washington Square News; SOURCE: NYU

Washington Square News via U-Wire
University Wire
March 8, 2007 Thursday

Book Review
New York

In 2006, Turkish author Elif Shafak was accused of and tried for
violating Article 301 of the Turkish Penal Code, which makes it a
crime to engage in "public denigration of Turkishness." One of the
gravest ways to do this is to acknowledge and identify the Armenian
genocide that took place under Ottoman rule between 1915 and 1917.

Shafak does this artfully in her recent novel, "The Bastard of
Istanbul," in which she explores the interaction of two families,
one Turkish and the other Armenian, joined together by marriage.

The characters’ use of the word "genocide" is what landed Shafak in
court. According to the Turkish government, the mass deportation
and killing of an estimated 1.5 million Turkish Armenians was a
consequence of World War I, rather than the result of a concentrated
effort by those in power to eliminate a whole population. Despite the
censure of the denial of this event by the international community,
the Turkish government still adheres to this position and persecutes
those within its country who contradict them.

The "Bastard of Istanbul" is Shafak’s vehicle to draw the world’s
attention to the Armenian genocide so vigorously denied by her country.

Shafak has a sharp and colorful knack for description. There is a
character with "the most blatantly aquiline nose, of which there were
only two others in world history — Sultan Mehmed the Conqueror’s
and Auntie Zeliha’s." Then there is the Dipsomatic Cartoonist, a
painfully jaded man in a lackluster marriage, experiencing so much
emotional turmoil that "even his wife" could sympathize. And then
there is Rose, an American who, while dealing with her divorce from
an Armenian man, meets the Turkish Mustafa and pursues him simply to
spite her staunchly anti-Turk in-laws.

Rose’s daughter, Armanoush, grows up in Arizona with her mother and
Turkish stepfather. She frequently visits her biological father in
San Francisco, where his psychologically scarred family educates her
about her Armenian heritage and the genocide her people suffered at
the hands of the Turks. Armanoush is very affected by what she is
told, so at age 21, unbeknownst to her family, she travels to Turkey
to try to understand her Turkish-Armenian identities. She meets and
stays with her stepfather’s family, the Kazancis.

The story centers around the women of the multi-generational Kazanci
family in Istanbul. This Turkish family represents the old and the
new of the country’s politics.

There is the clairvoyant Auntie Banu, who wears a headscarf that
her mother and sisters find offensive because it speaks of the past
suppression of women, abolished decades earlier by Ataturk. In stark
contrast is her sister, Zeliha, a provocatively dressed, rebellious
tattoo artist, who swears habitually and gives birth to the "the
bastard of Istanbul" at age 19. The mentally ill Aunt Ferida is
described as changing her hair color so much, "at each stage of her
journey to insanity," that her doctors even kept a hair chart "to
follow the changes in her psychology." Cevriye is "a humorless history
teacher with a Spartan sense of discipline and self-control" who
"crusaded against impulsiveness, disruption and spontaneity at home."

These women form the crucible within which the action in Istanbul
occurs.

The Turkey that Armanoush finds in her search for identity is
described by the Dipsomaniac Cartoonist at a weekly meeting with
his cynical intellectual friends at the Kundera cafe. This man,
undergoing prosecution by the government for the content of his work,
laments the sociopolitical climate of Turkey.

"We are stuck between the East and the West," he says. "On the one
hand, there are the secular modernists, so proud of the regime they
constructed, you cannot breathe a critical word. They’ve got the army
and half the state on their side. On the other hand there are the
conventional traditionalists, so infatuated with the Ottoman past,
you cannot breathe a critical word. They’ve got the general public and
the remaining half of the state on their side. What is left for us?"

The title character, 19-year-old Asya, notes, "My family is a bunch
of clean freaks. … They always talk about the past, but it is a
cleansed version of the past. … Every day we swallow yet another
capsule of mendacity." These kinds of politically charged statements
prompted the Turkish government to prosecute Shafak.

Asya family, as a microcosm of Turkey, exemplifies the country’s stance
on the Armenian genocide. Through her travels, Armanoush pushes her
Turkish step-family to address what her country really did to her
people, in this highly enjoyable, elucidative novel.

ANKARA: How Has The West Alienated The Turks?

HOW HAS THE WEST ALIENATED THE TURKS?
View By Sahin Alpay

Journal of Turkish Weekly, Turkey
March 12 2007

There has been a sharp decline in support in Turkish public opinion
for the country’s European Union membership. Some surveys say only
about a third of the population is still positive toward the prospect
of joining the union. Furthermore, the US has never been as unpopular
in Turkey as it is today, with some surveys indicating that only about
one in 10 people have any sympathy for the country. On these grounds
much is currently being said and written about Turkey’s moving away
from the West. The truth, however, is the other way around: It is
the West that has moved away from Turkey. Let us begin with the EU.

In December 1999 the EU declared Turkey a "Candidate State destined
to join the EU on the basis of the same criteria as applied to
other Candidate States." It was announced in December 2004 that the
negotiation process was "an open-ended process, the outcome of which
cannot be guaranteed beforehand," meaning there was no commitment
on the part of the EU to accept Turkey. Even if the negotiations
were to be concluded successfully the EU would have to consider
its "absorption capacity" and reserved the right to stipulate "long
transitional periods, derogations, specific arrangements or permanent
safeguard clauses." Leading German, French and Austrian politicians
started offering Turkey "privileged partnership" instead of full
membership. France and Austria adopted legislation to subject future
EU member states to approval by referanda to make sure the doors were
closed to Turkey.

Greek Cyprus, whose government, contrary to its commitments to
work for a comprehensive solution of the Cyprus problem, actively
campaigned against the plan of former UN General-Secretary Kofi
Annan, has joined the union while the Turkish Cypriots, who strongly
embraced the Annan plan, were left out. While the EU has supported
the Annan plan, implicitly recognizing the existence of two different
peoples on Cyprus, it regards the Greek government as the sole legal
representative of the whole island. The Greek Cypriot government
is using its EU membership as a leverage for a return to pre-1974
conditions.

The European Court of Human Rights, the judgments of which form part of
the EU Acquis Communitaire, has endorsed the headscarf ban in Turkish
universities. The European Commission has never referred to this ban
as a violation of religious rights in Turkey. The European Parliament
has called for the recognition by Turkey of the "Armenian genocide"
and of other "genocides" committed by the Ottoman State.

Certain European politicians have even demanded recognition of the
"Armenian genocide" be set as a precondition for Turkish membership
in the EU.

The widespread identification of Islam with terrorism, and the rising
tide of Islamophobia in the West in the aftermath of Sept. 11, is
certainly not welcome among the Turks. The publishing of denigrating
cartoons of Prophet Mohammed in Denmark and elsewhere in Europe and
the references by Pope Benedict XVI to Islam as "inhuman and evil"
have also helped spread the image of the EU as a "Christian Club"
where Turkey is not wanted.

The administration of US President George W. Bush has also done its
best to alienate Turkish public opinion. The invasion of Iraq with no
legitimate justification has turned Turkey’s neighboring country into
a hotbed of terrorism and caused the deaths of hundreds of thousands of
innocent Muslims. The Bush administration has unconditionally supported
Israel’s occupation and oppression of the Palestinian people. It talks
about a "war on terrorism," but does nothing to stop the terrorists of
the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) from using northern Iraq as a base
to attack Turkey. The chaos in Iraq seriously threatens stability here.

Widespread disappointment with the EU and indignation against the
US can surely not be explained by the "Islamist fundamentalist"
government’s conspiring to move Turkey away from the West or by the
rising tide of Turkish nationalism. Just three years ago over 70
percent of Turks surveyed were in favor of EU membership. During the
presidency of Bill Clinton the US ranked among the most popular foreign
nations. (It is thus certainly not anti-Americanism, but anti-Bushism
which is rampant in Turkey today.) Resentment against the West is
certainly being exploited by ultranationalist groups, who are far from
representing the mainstream, but that resentment is certainly shared
by the great majority and is spread across the full political spectrum.

Does all this mean Turkey is likely to change its Western
orientation? That is the topic of another column.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

ANKARA: Turkish Party Leader Perincek To Appeal Sentence For So-Call

TURKISH PARTY LEADER PERINCEK TO APPEAL SENTENCE FOR SO-CALLED ARMENIA GENOCIDE DENIAL

Journal of Turkish Weekly, Turkey
March 12 2007

GENEVA – Dogu Perincek, Turkish leftist party leader, will appeal his
conviction under a Swiss law for denying that killings of Armenians
during World War One constituted genocide, his lawyer said on Monday.

Mr. Perincek, the leader of the Turkish Labour Party, received a fine
of 3,000 Swiss francs (1,900 euros, 2,500 dollars) and a suspended
sentence last Friday from a court in Lausanne, over comments he made
during a rally in the Swiss city in 2005.

He was the first person to be convicted in Switzerland for denying the
so-called Armenian genocide, following his claim the killings were an
"international lie".

Judge Pierre-Henri Winzap said on Friday that Perincek was an "arrogant
provocateur" with "racist and nationalist motives".

In response, Perincek said the court’s ruling "reflects in a concrete
manner the Swiss judge’s hatred for Turkey and the Turkish nation."

The judge did not allow the Turks inside the court while the Armenian
supporters were inside.

No Meeting Between Armenian And Azerbaijani Presidents Will Be Held

NO MEETING BETWEEN ARMENIAN AND AZERBAIJANI PRESIDENTS WILL BE HELD UNTIL MAY 12, BERNARD FASSIER DECLARES

Noyan Tapan
Mar 12 2007

YEREVAN, MARCH 12, NOYAN TAPAN. "All conditions necessary for holding
a meeting between Armenian and Azerbaijani Foreign Ministers have
been created and if the sides manifest will, the meeting will be
successful." OSCE Minsk Group French Co-chairman Bernard Fassier
declared this at the March 12 press conference. He reported that
after his visit to the region, the final point of which was Yerevan,
he will leave for Geneva where he will meet with his colleagues of
OSCE Minsk Group to discuss the details of the meeting between the
two countries’ Ministers. In his words, the idea to organize such
a meeting occured to OSCE Minsk Group Co-chairs after "the climate
around the negotiations changed a little" lately. B. Fassier said
that one of the most important goals of his current visit to the
region was preparation for the meeting in Geneva.

"I mean not new or some magical proposals. Proposals on the
negotiations table require hard work." The French diplomat
estimated meetings held both in Baku and Yerevan as constructive
and useful. B. Fassier stated that no meeting between Armenian and
Azerbaijani Presidents will be held until May 12, i.e., until the
parliamentary elections, as the preelectoral process "is not the best
time for this." Meanwhile, he added that in that case the activities
on negotiations will continue, too.

Every "Frozen Conflict" Has Its Logic And Uniqueness

EVERY "FROZEN CONFLICT" HAS ITS LOGIC AND UNIQUENESS

PanARMENIAN.Net
12.03.2007 20:17 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Every "frozen conflict" has its logic and uniqueness,
OSCE Minsk Group French Co-Chair Bernard Fassier stated to a press
conference in Yerevan. He said, solution of every conflict must
be individual, proceeding from peculiarities of that conflict. "In
this sense conflicts in South Ossetia, Abkhazia and Nagorno Karabakh
are different. And moreover, the conflict in Kosovo, which as some
experts think, can become a precedent. In this case there is no sense
in drawing a parallel between them.

Every conflicts is being settled in various formats: South Ossetia
and Kosovo through the UN, Abkhazia with the help of Russia and the
Nagorno Karabakh conflict through OSCE Minsk Group, and to change
the format will only hamper the settlement process," Fassier stressed.

Alongside he underlined that the Nagorno Karabakh conflict has the
following logic. First, Nagorno Karabakh has already had autonomy
within Soviet Azerbaijan. And second, this is a conflict between two
countries. "To take the negotiation process to UN will have negative
influence on the whole process, and in our statements we’ve called upon
the sides to avoid from such initiatives," the French mediator said.

According To Observations Of Cultural Attaches Of Embassies Of Franc

ACCORDING TO OBSERVATIONS OF CULTURAL ATTACHES OF EMBASSIES OF FRANCE AND SYRIA, ARMENIANS HAVE EXCLUSIVE, PURELY ARMENIAN CULTURE

Noyan Tapan
Mar 12 2007

YEREVAN, MARCH 12, NOYAN TAPAN. Armenia being on the borderline of
eastern and western civilizations, nevertheless, has an exclusive,
purely Armenian culture, which has been also enriched by the best
traditions of eastern and western civilizations. Cultural Attaches
of Embassies of France and Syria in Armenia, Annie Monelli and
Muhamadia Alnasani expressed such an opinion at the March 12 meeting
in Yerevan on the subject Armenia as a Crossroad of Western and
Eastern Civilizations. "Coming to Armenia I hoped to see a western
culture here, but I came and felt that I am partly in an eastern
country," Annie Monelli said. In her words, this eastern orientation is
especially felt at the market, in the variety and abundance of spices,
as well as in the song and dance. "I am surprised at the refined taste
of Armenian women’s dressing, their conduct, but when they dance,
the eastern element is at once expressed," the Cultural Attache of
French Embassy stated. Cultural Attache of Embassy of Syria to Armenia
Muhamadia Alnasani agreeing to her colleague’s observations, added
that Armenians are closer to the eastern civilization, as distance
between Armenia and Syria is only 2000 km and for Armenians like
Syrians the tradition of family also has a peculiar role.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress