Vartan Oskanian: We See No Possibility To Deviate And Go Back In Iss

VARTAN OSKANIAN: WE SEE NO POSSIBILITY TO DEVIATE AND GO BACK IN ISSUE OF KARABAKH

Noyan Tapan
Mar 21 2007

YEREVAN, MARCH 21, NOYAN TAPAN. Certainly, Armenia is for the
negotiations over Nagorno Karabakh settlement to finish as quickly
as possible and the quicker the sides reach an agreement the
better. Armenian Foreign Minister Vartan Oskanian stated this at the
March 21 press conference.

However, in his words, unfortunately, the sides "are not so close to
agreement" and the last meeting between the two countries’ Foreign
Ministers in Geneva is the evidence of the fact that there are still
many disagreements over various issues.

"After the Geneva meeting I myself had declared that it was rather
complicated and difficult meeting. I cannot say that we registered
progress during that meeting. Therefore a decision was made to hold
the next meeting soon and to register progress, and so, to pave the
way for a possible meeting of the Presidents after the parliamentary
elections," V. Oskanian mentioned. At the same time he stated
that Armenia will be guided by the document on the negotiations
table, the main axis of which is the problem of Nagorno Karabakh
self-determination.

As regards possible parallels between Nagorno Karabakh and
Kosovo conflicts, V. Oskanian said that each conflict has its
peculiarities. "The Nagorno Karabakh problem has its peculiar way
and it precisely goes by the self-determination path. Irrespective
of the fact how the Kosovo problem will be solved, we do not see a
possibility of deviating and going back in the issue of Karabakh,"
the Armenian Foreign Minister stated.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Analysis: Congress Debates Armenia Genocide

ANALYSIS: CONGRESS DEBATES ARMENIA GENOCIDE
By Michael Scher

UPI Correspondent
Mar 21 2007

WASHINGTON, March 21 (UPI) — In 1896 former U.S. Minister to the
Ottoman Empire Oscar Straus convinced President Grover Cleveland
to ignore a controversial resolution passed by both the Senate and
the House of Representatives that would have called for the Ottoman
Sultan to stop his killing of ethnic Armenians.

More than 100 years later the U.S. Congress is at a similar crossroads
on the very same issue. House and Senate Resolutions 106 call for
American foreign policy to recognize the killings of Armenians by
the former Ottoman Empire as "genocide." The Republic of Turkey is
the official successor state to the Ottoman Empire because of the
Treaty of Lausanne in 1923.

Being the official successor state is part of the reason for the
Turkish government wanting to deny that the Armenian killings were
a genocide, said Brian Kabateck, a senior partner in Kabateck,
Brown & Keller, a law firm that has represented about a half-dozen
Armenian-Americans in cases against U.S. insurance companies and
banks that have denied claims and accounts to relatives of deceased
Armenians who took out insurance and had accounts before they died in
the Armenian Genocide. Kabateck said that the Ottoman state seized
property and businesses and that Turkey would be responsible for
reparations to Armenians and the nation of Armenia if they admitted
that what the Ottoman state did was genocide.

Kabateck’s suits throw into light the fact that there are 1 million
or so Armenians living in the United States. The main sponsor of
Resolution 106 in the House is Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., whose
constituency has a large population of Armenians.

Schiff is sponsoring this legislation because he believes that the U.S.
cannot have the moral authority it’s projecting in the current Darfur
crisis without recognizing a genocide that happened 90 years ago. He
said it is important for the United States to recognize the killings
as genocide despite the fact that Turkey is a friend and an ally.

"More often with friends than foes you have to speak candidly,"
Schiff said.

"I happen to believe … that the final act of genocide is the denial
of genocide."

In 2004 a similar resolution, also sponsored by Schiff, was met with
resistance from the Bush administration because it feared it would
damage relations with Turkey, Schiff said. Schiff said that if the
current resolution passes it will affect U.S.-Turkey relations, but he
believes the Bush administration should spend less time appealing to
Congress not to pass the resolution and work on repairing the damage
it did to relations with Turkey because of the Iraq war.

"They keep saying now is not the time," Schiff said. "It’s been 90
years. If this is not the time, when is?"

A central tenet of this bill is to recognize that what happened was
genocide, Schiff said. This is something the Bush administration is
protesting fearing a negative impact on relations with Turkey. However,
in every letter the administration sends to Congress it recognizes
what happened was genocide, Schiff said.

Tuluy Tanc, the minister counselor at Turkey’s Embassy in Washington,
said that while this resolution will most likely not result in
restrictions on the U.S. military or hurt cooperation between Turkey
and the United States over security in Iraq, it will hurt the Turkish
people.

"There will be a reaction and Turkey will be deeply hurt," Tanc
said. "How the government will react I cannot say, but there will be
feelings of unfairness towards a friend and an ally. … This will
be like a little slap in the face."

Tanc said that the Armenian lobby’s presentation of facts to the U.S.
Congress was one-sided and that Congress was not taking into account
the Turkish side of the story.

For instance, Tanc provided Ottoman Empire census documents that showed
there were only 1.5 million Armenians living in Turkey at the time
of the killings. Historians claim 1.5 million Armenians were killed,
which Tanc said was part of the inaccuracies in the current resolution.

Mehdi Noorbaksh, an associate professor of international affairs at
the Harrisburg University of Science and Technology in Pennsylvania,
said that if this resolution passes it will have a negative impact
on U.S.-Turkey relations.

"It will be a disaster in a sense for Turkey," Noorbaksh said. "I
really do not think this administration is ready for a resolution
like this. … This will not help the United States."

It will be necessary for the current Islamist government in power in
Turkey right now to react strongly to this in order to remain in power,
Noorbaksh said.

Some 20 other nations have passed resolutions similar to Resolution
106 and have gotten similar threats of dissatisfaction from Turkey,
said Aram Hamparian, executive director of the Armenian National
Committee of America. When France passed a similar resolution in 2001
it was met with a stern reaction from the Turkish government, however,
the very next year trade rose by 22 percent between France and Turkey.

The United States has a long history of weaker resolutions of the
genocide dating back to the 1980s that have not hampered relations with
Turkey, Hamparian said. In 1981 President Ronald Reagan recognized the
Armenian Genocide in a speech about the Holocaust. In 1984 Congress
passed a resolution setting April 24 as a day of remembrance of
the Armenian Genocide. In 1996 and 2004 resolutions were passed
that limited the usage of U.S. aid to Turkey that was being used to
fund the Turkish lobby in the United States. Throughout all of these
resolutions, trade with Turkey has steadily increased Hamparian said.

"U.S. relations with Turkey will certainly endure this (resolution
106)," Hamparian said.

A.G. Sargsian: Though Speaking About Armenian Genocide Is Not Prohib

A.G. SARGSIAN: THOUGH SPEAKING ABOUT ARMENIAN GENOCIDE IS NOT PROHIBITED IN TURKEY, NEVERTHELESS, SPEAKING ABOUT THIS SUBJECT CAN END IN A MURDER

Noyan Tapan
Armenians Today
Mar 21 2007

YEREVAN, MARCH 21, NOYAN TAPAN – ARMENIANS TODAY. "Certainly, it is
possible to speak about the fact of Armenian Genocide in Turkey, but
after it the person speaking about it can be killed, as they killed
Hrant Dink, or they can create an atmosphere under which that person
will run away from Turkey like Orhan Pamuk." Aram G. Sargsian, Chairman
of Democratic Party of Armenia (DPA), stated this. He took part in
the first day of international seminar under the title "Dialogue of
Civilizations" on March 12-15 in France answering Turkish journalist
Lale Shvgn’s question, why in France one must not deny the Armenian
Genocide, while in Turkey one can speak about the Genocide."

As A. Sargsian stated at the March 21 press conference, before the
interview the Turkish journalist "was very kind and smiling," but
immediately after turning on the video camera she started to treat
him coldly and rudely.

As the DPA leader affirmed, during all international seminars and
events Turks try to exert moral-psychological pressure upon members
of Armenian delegation forming a formal "favorable" impression of
establishing relations with Armenia. "But indeed they respond very
strictly to anyone who tries to raise the issue of the Genocide,"
the speaker emphasized.

RA President Signs Laws "On Making Amendments And Additions To Regul

RA PRESIDENT SIGNS LAWS "ON MAKING AMENDMENTS AND ADDITIONS TO REGULATIONS OF NATIONAL COMMISSION FOR TELEVISION AND RADIO AND TO LAW "ON TELEVISION AND RADIO"

Noyan Tapan
Mar 21 2007

YEREVAN, MARCH 21, NOYAN TAPAN. On March 20, RA President Robert
Kocharian signed laws "On Making Amendments and Additions to
Regulations of National Commission for Television and Radio" and to law
"On Television and Radio." Noyan Tapan was informed about it from RA
President’s Press Office.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

BAKU: The Washington Times: Ex-Azeri Official Held For 17 Months

THE WASHINGTON TIMES: EX-AZERI OFFICIAL HELD FOR 17 MONTHS
By Jason Motlagh

Today.Az
/
17 March 2007 [11:06]

The view from Sabina Aliyeva’s balcony commands the skyline of this
reborn boomtown and the Caspian Sea beyond, but for the past 17 months
one stark gray building off to the right has loomed large.

Inside, her husband, Farhad Aliyev, the former minister of economic
development and a leading pro-West reformer, remains locked in solitary
confinement, charged with planning a coup — though no evidence of
it has been put before a court of law.

International human rights groups and U.S. lawmakers say Mr. Aliyev
is a political prisoner whose rights have been violated as he awaits
due process.

According to Azeri law, a judge must hear his case by April or release
him from pretrial detention.

he high-profile case comes amid efforts by the Bush administration
to secure closer ties with the oil-rich nation, considered to be of
increasing importance in a sensitive region. Critics counter that
better bilateral relations must be in step with U.S. demands for
democratic reform, and not allow a convenient foreign policy to
obscure a grim human rights record.

Azerbaijan is a secular Muslim country on the western shore
of the Caspian Sea, wedged among Iran, Armenia, Russia and
Georgia. U.S. officials have stressed its value as a reliable energy
supplier, citing continued Azeri oil and natural-gas deliveries to
Europe as a counterweight to Russia’s state-owned energy giant Gazprom.

President Ilham Aliyev — no relation to the accused — has also
been a willing partner on security issues. One of the first foreign
leaders to contribute troops to missions in Iraq and Afghanistan,
he granted U.S. pilots overflight rights in Azeri airspace, and the
Pentagon is sponsoring an upgrade of a former Soviet airfield for
potential use by American forces.

Some observers also point to the sizable and at times restive Azeri
minority in Iran as a potential tool if a conflict with the United
States or its allies broke out. Azerbaijan insists it will have no
part in any military action against the Islamic republic.

Azerbaijan has a reputation of being heavy-handed toward its citizens.

Before its November 2005 parliamentary elections, condemned by
international observers as flawed, riot police reportedly beat up
protesters in the streets and arrested hundreds.

Farhad Aliyev, his younger brother Rafig, former head of the leading
Azeri oil refiner, Azpetrol, and a handful of other officials were
summarily arrested on charges of plotting a coup.

The vote itself was marred by irregularities, ballot stuffing
and intimidation, according to the Organization for Security and
Cooperation in Europe.

Still, President Aliyev was invited to the White House last April.

Washington justified his first meeting with President Bush on basis
that his regime is in a different class than autocracies like those
in Belarus and Uzbekistan, thus should be engaged rather than left
to gravitate toward Moscow or Tehran.

Opponents say corruption and ongoing crackdowns on civil freedoms
could have a destabilizing effect in Azerbaijan. They say Farhad Aliyev
challenged the political establishment to make free-market reforms, to
better integrate with the West, and is now being denied U.S. support.

"We’re defending Farhad Aliyev because we defend the ideas he
represents," said Murad Saddadinov, an Azeri human rights activist
and former political prisoner. "If we do not support him, we will
soon lose everybody like him in Azerbaijan."

Mr. Saddadinov said he fears the emergence of a more radical brand
of Islam if democratization does not take hold, noting the growing
attendance at Wahhabi mosques in the capital. One Western official
said he saw "the potential," but doubted such an outcome in the
foreseeable future.

Appointed by President Ilham Aliyev’s father, post-Soviet strongman
Heydar Aliyev, who died in 2003 at a U.S. hospital, Farhad Aliyev
led a broad campaign to open the economy and reduce the power of
state-affiliated monopolists that had long controlled the flow of
imports and exports in Azerbaijan.

One of Farhad Aliyev’s top priorities was an overhaul of the state
customs committee, considered by the Azeri public and business
community as a corruption machine. Azerbaijan ranked 130th among 163
countries in Transparency International’s latest corruption index.

"Corruption is endemic in this country … [and the customs] department
has been at the top of the list," said a European official working
in Azerbaijan who deals directly with the government on reform matters.

Farhad Aliyev "was generally regarded as a fair and good businessman,
even among a disillusioned Azeri public. The West rightfully saw him
as someone to work with — someone with a promising political future."

An intense rivalry soon developed between Farhad Aliyev and customs
chief Kamaleddin Heydarov, whom Mr. Aliyev accused of stifling economic
growth by making it hard for new business — foreign or domestic —
to enter Azerbaijan’s markets.

Both men used the press to try to win over the public and President
Aliyev.

Azeri news reports agree that state interference was reduced in
entrepreneurial activities and certain meddlesome agencies were
abolished.

Ali, 23, a university student who asked that his full name not be
made public, said Farhad Aliyev was well liked at a time most Azeris
had tuned out politics.

"He came across as someone who actually cared about people and change,
not his bank account," said Ali. "His popularity was definitely
growing … and is probably why he was removed."

Farhad Aliyev went out on a limb when he said that as far as
Azerbaijan’s social and economic development are concerned, "Russia
is Azerbaijan’s past, the West is its future."

On Oct. 19, 2005, weeks after he had told the prosecutor general’s
office that unspecified criminal groups had threatened to kill him, he
was arrested for conspiring to overthrow the government. A corruption
charge was later added.

Officials accused Farhad Aliyev of paying supporters of Rasul Guliyev,
the exiled chairman of a major opposition party, to stir unrest upon
his return from the United States to run in the elections. The charge
was based on the confession of ousted Finance Minister Fikrat Yusifov,
a reputed co-conspirator, who was released two months later.

Mr. Guliyev has categorically denied the claim or that he ever met
Farhad Aliyev. Analysts queried in the capital agreed that such
an association was highly unlikely, given their opposing party
affiliations.

Charles Both, an American lawyer who represents Farhad Aliyev and
his brother, says that since their arrest, the original charges have
not been declared in court; no evidence in support of the charges has
been offered; no public hearing has been held; and no trial date set.

Azerbaijan’s law stipulates that pretrial detention can last a maximum
of 18 months, meaning the government has until next month to hear
the case.

Farhad Aliyev suffers from heart problems, including hypertension
and hypertrophy, but has been denied sufficient medical attention,
according to the International League for Human Rights.

To date, his wife and two children have had no contact with
him. They say they have been subject to harassment and surveillance
by authorities — notably on the day of his arrest when their home
was stormed by armed men and valuables were stolen. The family has
since moved to a guarded apartment in view of the National Security
Ministry, where the brothers are being held.

Meanwhile, the business interests of the Aliyev brothers have been
confiscated and sold off to "pro-Russian business enterprises favored
by the Azeri authorities," according to a study by Mr. Both, the
American lawyer.

He said the charges against the pair are "the direct result of Farhad
Aliyev’s position in open favor of [Azerbaijan’s] integration into
the international community, closer ties with the United States, [the]
European Union … and successful implementation of economic reforms
and anti-monopoly policy, all of which run counter the interests of
many powerful domestic players."

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

www.washingtontimes.com/

Speaker Of Turkey’s Great National Assembly Sends Letter To Speaker

SPEAKER OF TURKEY’S GREAT NATIONAL ASSEMBLY SENDS LETTER TO SPEAKER OF HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF US CONGRESS, URGING HER NOT TO DISCUSS BILL ON ARMENIAN GENOCIDE

Noyan Tapan
Armenians Today
Mar 21 2007

ANKARA, MARCH 21, NOYAN TAPAN – ARMENIANS TODAY. "Turkey is not in
the role of an irresponsible denier in the issue of the events of
1915." This is said in the 4-page letter that Speaker of Turkey’s
Great National Assembly Bulent Arinc sent to Speaker of the House
of Representatives of the US Congress Nancy Pelosi. In the letter
B. Arinc urges Pelosi not to discuss the draft resolution on the
Armenian Genocide.

The letter, which the Turkish ambassador to the US will hand to
N. Pelosi, also has a 2-page enclosure, in which speaker of the
Turkish parliament informs Pelosi about the "events" of 1915-1919.

Arinc reminds his US colleague that Turkey proposed Armenian historians
to conduct a joint "impartial study" on the issue of the Armenian
Genocide but "there has been no response from Armenians". "Armenia
still keeps its archives closed," Arinc claims.

The speaker of the Turkish parliament called on Armenian historians
to discuss the issue – with the participation of third countries,
including American historians.

"If resolution No.106 is adopted, the Armenians will state the US
has recognized their unfounded claims regarding the 1915 events. The
Turkish socity will perceive such development as support of the claims
of Armenians," Arinc concludes.

According to Turkish Daily News, the Turkish Prime Ministere Recep
Tayyip Erdogan also intends to apply soon to President Bush by
telephone or letter regarding the same issue.

Pace Fact-Finding Mission’s Visit To South Caucasus Delayed

PACE FACT-FINDING MISSION’S VISIT TO SOUTH CAUCASUS DELAYED

Noyan Tapan
Mar 21 2007

YEREVAN, MARCH 21, NOYAN TAPAN. Christopher Grayson, Head of PACE
Secretariate of Committee for Culture, Science and Education, informed
RA National Assembly’s delegation at the Parliamentary Assembly that
the fact-finding mission of Edward O’Hara (Great Britain), Rapporteur
of Subcommittee for Cultural Heritage, to South Caucasus scheduled
for April will not take place.

According to the report provided to Noyan Tapan from RA NA Public
Relations Department, the visit’s delay is conditioned by the
circumstance that the Rapporteur is very busy at his electoral
district. It is mentioned that PACE will touch upon the new term of
his visit during regular sitting of 2007 April session of Subcommittee
for Cultural Heritage.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Ehud Gol Appointed Ambassador Of Israel To RA

EHUD GOL APPOINTED AMBASSADOR OF ISRAEL TO RA

Noyan Tapan
Mar 21 2007

YEREVAN, MARCH 21, NOYAN TAPAN. On March 21, Ambassador of Israel
to Armenia Ehud Gol (residence Jerusalem) handed the copy of his
credentials to RA Foreign Minister Vartan Oskanian. According to the
report provided to Noyan Tapan from RA Foreign Ministry Press and
Information Department, V. Oskanian and E. Gol discussed regional
issues, prospects of settlement of Israeli-Palestine and Nagorno
Karabakh conflicts.

E. Gol was born in 1946 in Jerusalem. During his working activity he
held the following posts: Consul (for press and information affairs)
in Consulate General of Israel to Chicago, Consul in Consulate General
in New York, in 1986-88 Foreign Ministry Spokesperson, Director of
Press Department, in 1986-88 Special Adviser to President, in 1988-91
Consul General in Rio de Janeiro, in 1991-92 Adviser to Prime Minister
for Press Affairs, in 1995-99 Ambassador of Israel to Spain and
pluralistically also in Andorra, in 1999-2001 Deputy Director General
of Foreign Ministry for West Europe Affairs, in 2001-06 Ambassador of
Israel to Italy, in 2007 he was pluralistically appointed Ambassador
of Israel to Armenia, Kyrghyzstan, Tajikistan and Turkmenistan.

Opening Ceremony Of "Yerevan" Trade Center To Take Place In Moscow O

OPENING CEREMONY OF "YEREVAN" TRADE CENTER TO TAKE PLACE IN MOSCOW ON MARCH 24

Noyan Tapan
Mar 21 2007

YEREVAN, MARCH 21, NOYAN TAPAN. A delegation headed by Mayor of Yerevan
Yervand Zakarian will leave for Moscow on March 24. NT correspondent
was informed at the Information and PR Department of Yerevan Mayor’s
Office that the official ceremony of opening the "Yerevan" trade center
will take place in Moscow on the same day with the participation of
the mayors of the two cities.

On March 25 Y. Zakarian will go on an official visit to Saint
Petersburg by the invitation of Governor of Saint Petersburg Valentina
Matvienko. During the visit, a bilateral meeting will be held,
during which the sides will discuss a number of problems related to
cooperation of Yerevan and Saint Petesburg.

It is enviasged to sign the 2007-2009 program of cooperation between
Yerevan and Saint Petersburg.

"Moscow House" To Open In Yerevan On March 23

"MOSCOW HOUSE" TO OPEN IN YEREVAN ON MARCH 23

Noyan Tapan
Mar 21 2007

YEREVAN, MARCH 21, NOYAN TAPAN. The delegation headed by Mayor
of Moscow Yuri Luzhkov will arrive in Yerevan on March 23. NT
correspondent was informed at the Information and PR Department of
Yerevan Mayor’s Office that during the meeting to be held at Yerevan
Mayor’s Office, the sides will discuss problems related to the process
of work envisaged by the 2005-2007 program of cooperation between
Yerevan and Moscow.

The official ceremony of opening "Moscow House" in Yerevan will take
place with the participation of the mayors of Yerevan and Moscow on
the same day.