Five must-see plays

The New York Daily News
June 23, 2005
Five must-see plays
Plays that merit the spotlight

If you look at what creates most of the headlines about theater, you might
imagine the only plays that get produced in New York are musicals,
specifically ones based on successful films.
But there is a surprising amount of serious theater in New York now. Apart
from “Doubt” and “The Pillowman” on Broadway, there are exciting dramas in
theaters all over the city, from the West Village to the upper East Side to
what has become Off-Broadway’s busiest thoroughfare, 15th St. just off Union
Square.
Here are five Off-Broadway plays definitely worth considering.
In some ways, the most remarkable play in New York at the moment is “Private
Fears in Public Places,” by Alan Ayckbourn. What is significant about the
production (at 59E59 Theatres until July 3) is that Ayckbourn himself – one
of the leading English playwrights of the last three decades – directed it.
The cast is from his own Stephen Joseph Theatre in Scarborough in the north
of England.
Like many of Ayckbourn’s works, “Private Fears” is a quiet comedy. Indeed,
the lives it describes are full of sadness. In one case – a man whose
longtime gay lover has died – the sadness is deep. In others, it is the
sadness of people who live in isolation, even from those closest to them.
They are, of course, English. So this sadness is buried beneath civility and
gentle humor.
Ayckbourn’s actors convey these complex feelings with a combination of
subtlety and intensity that makes the play’s many little dramas as funny as
they are disturbing.
This is particularly true of Melanie Gutteridge as an upper-class woman
whose relationship with an unemployed ex-soldier is souring. Class (in both
senses) is something hard for American actors to convey as effortlessly as
she does. But she also projects a touching stoicism.
As the boyfriend, Paul Thornley has some marvelous drunk scenes, no less
gross for being beautifully understated. As the bartender who serves as a
shrink to him (and whose own grief we discover only late in the play),
Adrian McLoughlin has a deeply touching dignity.
Paul Kemp and Sarah Moyle are hilarious at conveying the repressed longings
of a brother and sister, both single. So is Alexandra Mathie as a born-again
Christian who finds unexpected objects for her sexual needs.
Similar prowess is on display in another theater at 59E59, in Stewart
Permutt’s “Unsuspecting Susan,” performed by Celia Imrie, best known for her
role in the “Bridget Jones’s Diaries” movies.
Imrie plays a very upper-class Englishwoman whose world has raced out of
control. High comedy leads to queasy tension. Imrie balances the humor and
poignancy of her character elegantly.
Most of the characters in Austin Pendleton’s “Orson’s Shadow,” at the Barrow
Street Theater, are also English, but since they are all in the theater they
operate at an emotional and decibel level far above those in Ayckbourn’s
play.
All but one are public figures. The play concerns an actual incident in
1960, when Orson Welles, his Hollywood career in shambles, directed Laurence
Olivier in Ionesco’s “Rhinoceros.” It is the moment when Olivier is leaving
Vivien Leigh for his co-star, Joan Plowright.
On the one hand, the dialogue Pendleton has given them is deliciously
theatrical, but at times, especially in the glimpses we get of Leigh’s
breakdown, the emotions are raw and harrowing.
Interestingly, the cast is also “foreign.” Most of the actors are from
Chicago.
Jeff Still has a commanding presence as Welles. John Judd makes a
fascinating adversary for him as the oddly insecure, wheedling, combative,
ultimately poignant Olivier. Sean McNall is superb as the witty but
stammering critic Kenneth Tynan, who has to act as their referee.
Jennifer Van Dyck handles Leigh’s hysteria with tremendous authority, and
Susan Bennett has an impressive strength as Plowright. Ian Westerfer plays a
gofer with panache.
Richard Kalinoski’s “Beast on the Moon,” at the Century Theater (111 E. 15th
St.), is about a woman who survived the 1915 Armenian genocide and has
arrived in Milwaukee five years later as a mail-order bride.
The play moves from tragedy and turmoil to a profound sense of promise, a
journey director Larry Moss captures powerfully. Lena Georgas plays the
bride with affecting delicacy. Omar Metwally, who received a Tony nomination
for his work in “Sixteen Wounded,” is equally impressive here, blending
bewildered vulnerability with Old World masculine assertiveness. Louis
Zorich has wistful charm as an older version of the man.
Just down the block is “Manuscript,” by Paul Grellong, the first actual play
to appear in the Daryl Roth Theatre (101 E. 15th St.). The play about three
friends, two of whom want to be writers, is an extended exercise in fooling
the audience.
But the three young performers catch all of its unexpected turns niftily,
especially Marin Ireland, who makes an unscrupulous woman oddly fetching.
Pablo Schreiber and Jeffrey Carlson are both skillful as college friends.
Producing theater in New York has never been more of an uphill battle, but
all these Off-Broadway productions prove that victory is possible.
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

BAKU: No light at the end of the tunnel

AzerNews, Azerbaijan
June 23 2005
No light at the end of the tunnel

The talks between Azerbaijani and Armenian foreign ministers held in
Paris on Friday were ‘comprehensive, serious and beneficial’, Azeri
officials have said.
The ministers held a meeting attended by the co-chairs of the OSCE
Minsk Group (MG) mediating the Upper Garabagh conflict settlement.
The intermediaries also met with each minister in private.
Liberation of the occupied territories, the return of displaced
persons home and other issues were discussed.
The parties did not reach any specific agreements but their positions
‘drew closer’ on some issues, Deputy Foreign Minister Araz Azimov
said on Monday.
“The return of occupied territories is a pivotal issue for
Azerbaijan. This however, does not mean settling the conflict yet, as
a number of other problems will remain to be solved.”
Azimov told a news briefing that to achieve a conflict resolution,
the contempt between the two nations should be done away with, while
Azerbaijan and Armenia should start cooperating.
Among other key issues discussed in Paris was the co-existence of the
Azerbaijani and Armenian communities of Upper Garabagh. The issue of
granting Garabagh the status of self-administration is currently not
being discussed, the Deputy Foreign Minister said.
“The status of the region should be determined with the involvement
of all people living here. For this to be possible, all refugees must
return home.”
Azimov said Azerbaijan proposed to ensure a transportation link
between Upper Garabagh and Armenia, which is ‘currently under
scrutiny’. The proposal dwells upon restoring and opening the road
connecting Aghdam, Khankandi, Shusha, Lachin, the Goris and Sisian
regions of Armenia, and Shahbuz, Nakhchivan Autonomous Republic, with
further access to Turkey. Certainly, the road may open after the
occupied territories are liberated, said Azimov.
The Deputy Foreign Minister noted that the sides are interested in
opening this road, as it goes through residential areas populated by
both Azerbaijanis and Armenians.
“This road would facilitate restoring trust between Azerbaijani and
Armenian residents in the region. Opening of the road has not only
pragmatic but also political importance.”
In reply to a question whether the road will open before or after the
status of Garabagh is determined, Azimov said ‘it will be an
important step in the peace process leading to the status
determination’. As for financing issues, he said the road will not
require considerable funds, as it already exists and it is necessary
only to restore it in some areas and build small sections along the
route.
The Deputy Foreign Minister said a donor conference will be held on
the initiative of the OSCE Minsk Group after Azerbaijan and Armenia
reach an accord. Considerable funds will be required to restore the
liberated land, establish infrastructure and implement mine clearing
operations there, which cannot be done on account of the Azerbaijani
government alone, Azimov said.
“The European Union and other international organizations have
already said they will allocate funds for the purpose. Moreover, some
donor countries have stated they will be involved in the process on
the individual basis.”
The Deputy Foreign Minister noted that peacekeeping forces will be
stationed in the conflict zone after the conflict is resolved.
“It has been agreed that co-chairing countries [France, United States
and Russia] will not be included in these forces. The precise make-up
of peacekeepers will be determined as results are achieved in peace
talks.”
The MG co-chairs will visit Baku next month. The visit is likely to
take place on July 10 or 11. Its precise date will be determined
shortly. The intermediaries will leave Baku for Yerevan.
“Azerbaijan would like for the co-chairs to come up with concrete
proposals during their visit to the region”, Azimov said.
The next meeting of the Azerbaijani and Armenian presidents will be
held in Kazan, Russia late in August as part of the summit of the
Commonwealth of Independent States, the Deputy Foreign Minister said.
Azerbaijan suggested that the two countries’ foreign ministers meet
again at least twice before the presidents’ meeting.
“In general, the Azerbaijani side wants the negotiating process to be
stepped up”, Azimov said. He emphasized that it is time to continue
the negotiations on the level of experts.
With regard to the so-called ‘elections’ held by Garabagh
separatists, Azimov said this may be prevented only through peace.
“The conflict must be resolved within democracy and Azerbaijan’s
territorial integrity. Our position was fully supported by the MG
co-chairs.”
The mediators said at the Paris meeting that they consider the regime
in Garabagh illegitimate and do not recognize the results of the
‘elections’.
‘No progress’
Armenian foreign minister Oskanian says that talks with his Azeri
counterpart Mammadyarov were fruitless.
“Although the Presidents are taking little steps forward, no progress
was achieved at the Paris meeting.”
Oskanian was quoted by Radio Liberty as saying that the discussions
covered all areas – from the status of Upper Garabagh to refugees’
problems and security.
“The issue of peacekeepers was also discussed but negotiating this is
premature. The status of Garabagh is the most important issue for
Yerevan and until it is determined, other issues should not be
considered.”
Oskanian also said that ‘the foreign ministers failed to revitalize
the agreement reached by the two presidents in Warsaw’.
“We agreed to continue the talks and will probably meet again in
July”, he said.

BAKU: PACE committee on Garabagh to meet Thursday

Assa-Irada, Azerbaijan
June 23 2005
PACE committee on Garabagh to meet Thursday

Baku, June 22, AssA-Irada
The Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe committee on
Upper Garabagh will meet for the first time on Thursday.
On the first day of the PACE session, Wednesday, PACE approved the
composition of its temporary committee. It comprises parliament
members from Baku and Yerevan, chairs of separate PACE committees,
and the rapporteurs on Azerbaijan and Armenia, a representative of
the Azeri delegation at PACE Asim Mollazada said.
Mollazada, who chairs the organization committee of the Democratic
Reforms Party, will represent the Azerbaijani opposition at the PACE
committee.*

BAKU: Turkey, Azerbaijan to sign several documents

Assa-Irada, Azerbaijan
June 23 2005
Turkey, Azerbaijan to sign several documents

Baku, June 22, AssA-Irada
Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyib Erdogan will visit Baku June
29-30.
During the visit, Erdogan will meet with President Ilham Aliyev and
Prime Minister Artur Rasizada to discuss the situation in the region
and the Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict over Upper Garabagh, Turkish
Ambassador to Azerbaijan Turan Morali said in an exclusive interview
with AssA-Irada.
The Ambassador did not rule out that bilateral documents on economy,
education and mapping will be signed during the visit. Turkish and
Azerbaijani foreign ministries are in talks on the issue, he said.
This will be Erdogan’s first visit to Azerbaijan as Prime Minister.
He visited Baku for the first time in 2003 as a party chairman.*

Why Turkey’s EU Bid Could Hinge on Britain

Spiegel Online, Germany
June 23 2005
Why Turkey’s EU Bid Could Hinge on Britain
By Jürgen Gottschlich in Istanbul
The collapse of the European constitution has lent greater weight to
the powerful opponents of Turkey’s eventual membership in the
European Union. Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan is frustrated by
France and Germany, and increasingly Ankara believes that Tony Blair
is their last hope for joining the club.
When Tony Blair spoke before the European Parliament in Strasbourg on
Thursday morning, he could count on the fact that there would be no
shortage of viewers tuning in from Turkey to listen to each of his
carefully crafted words. After all, Britain’s prime minister has been
one of the most vocal proponents of future European Union membership
for Turkey. He continued with his supportive stance on Thursday, as
he laid out Britain’s goals for the EU presidency, a position it
assumes for six months starting July 1. Near the top of the list of
Blair’s agenda, he said, is to “carry out the Union’s obligations to
those like Turkey and Croatia that wait in hope of a future as part
of Europe.”
The preliminary collapse of the EU constitution, has suddenly
catapulted the British prime minister into the roll of Europe’s
most-powerful man. But for the Turkish government, he is far more.
Even if nobody is admitting it publicly, Blair is essentially
Ankara’s last hope — Obi-Wan Kenobi to Turkey’s pleading Princess
Lea. Even before the constitution disaster, Blair was one of the few
leaders in Europe whom Turks could count on. Now, he appears to be
the last chance the Turks have in a Europe divided by duelling
visions and internecine rivalries.

Earlier this year, eurocrats in Brussels openly worried that Turkey
had begun dragging its feet on reforms after Ankara had been given a
date at the December 2004 EU summit for accession talks to begin. At
that point, it was the British who stepped in to help its friend.
Behind the scenes, London helped the Turkish government search for a
solution to the Cyprus issue that would be acceptable to all. As a
way of saying thanks for the gesture, Turkish Foreign Minister
Abdullah Gül announced that Turkey would wait to amend a 1996 customs
agreement with the EU to expand it to the 10 new EU member states
after Britain took the helm of the EU presidency.
Does Turkey have a future in the EU?
Now, suddenly, the question being asked in Brussels isn’t whether or
not the Turks sign a document that would give de facto recognition of
the Greek-Cypriot government on an island which has been divided
since the Turks invaded the northern third in 1974. Instead, it rests
on whether any kind of EU expansion will ever even come to fruition.
At major Turkish newspapers, commentators quickly figured out that
some European leaders are reinterpreting the failure of the
constitution as a vote against expansion. Columnist Mehmet Ali Birand
poignantly wrote: “If you take a closer look at this argument, then
you have to assume that the decision has already been made for
Bulgaria and Romania. Croatia is a relatively small country that is
ill-equipped to take the blame, and for that reason everything will
now be blamed on Turkey.”
Last week, Germany’s parliament, the Bundestag, passed a resolution
criticizing Turkey for not acknowledging its role in the “Armenian
massacre” a century ago. Parliament stopped short of calling it
“genocide,” but the response from Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan
demonstrated the great disappointment of the Turks in the
German-French EU axis. In Beirut, an irate Erdogan called the
decision “ugly” and “wrong.” And right after returning to Ankara, he
struck again, attacking his buddy, German Chancellor Gerhard
Schroeder, head on. “I admire politicians with backbones,” he said.
“When Mr. Schroeder was in Turkey a few weeks ago, he was still
supporting our position.” Not exactly the way you talk about a
politician whose support you may need in the future.
Privileged partner or full-fledged member?
Then again, Schroeder may no longer matter to Erdogan. With the
conservative Angela Merkel expected to succeed Schroeder as
chancellor after snap autumn elections and Nikolas Sarkozy likely in
line to become the next French president, Tony Blair is the last
remaining hope Turkey has for membership. Both Merkel and Sarkozy are
staunch opponents of giving Turkey a place at the table in Brussels.
So far, the official tenor in Turkey has been to remain distant from
the looming fight over the future of Europe. “Turkey has done its
homework on the road to the EU,” Foreign Minister Gül recently
reiterated. “We are continuing with our reforms.” He pointed out that
Turkey’s new criminal law went into effect on June 1, as promised,
adding that the Cyprus Protocol was ready and that it could be signed
as early as July. If the Oct. 3 date for starting accession talks
falls through, he said, it won’t be through any fault of Ankara.
But what kind of accession are the Europeans supposed to negotiate in
October? A growing number of supporters of a more deeply integrated
Europe — from the head of the Social Democratic faction in the
European Parliament, Martin Schulz, to European Commissioner for
Industry Guenther Verheugen to Angela Merkel — are calling for a
“privileged partnership” for Turkey rather than full EU membership.
So far, at least, Blair has not made any similar comments. Instead,
the British have always implied that they’ve been pushing for EU
expansion in order to torpedo the vision of many on the continent for
a United States of Europe.
But for now, at least, the Brits appear to have the next move. And
they are likely to find broad support in Turkey. Mehmet Ali Birand,
an untiring EU propagandist in the Turkish media, recently told his
readers that Blair is on the right track. “The agricultural subsidies
upon which the EU spends 40 percent of its budget, are an
anachronism,” he wrote. Besides, “Old Europe,” with its vision of
transferring ever more sovereignty to Brussels would have kept
raising the bar for membership, making it more and more difficult for
Turkey to join the EU. “Blair,” Birand wrote, “is flexible in that
sense. The conditions Turkey must fulfil will be less difficult.”
Next week, when Britain takes the helm of the EU for six months,
Birand’s thesis will be put to the test.

ASBAREZ Online [06-23-2005]

ASBAREZ ONLINE
TOP STORIES
06/23/2005
TO ACCESS PREVIOUS ASBAREZ ONLINE EDITIONS PLEASE VISIT OUR
WEBSITE AT <;HTTP:// 1) ARF Artsakh Demands Investigation into Manukian Beating Incident 2) New Jersey Recognizes Armenian Genocide 3) Homenetmen Establishes New Chapter in Hungary 4) ARF Youth Delegates Discuss Genocide at IUSY Conference in Turkey 1) ARF Artsakh Demands Investigation into Manukian Beating Incident STEPANAKERT--The Central Committee of the Armenian Revolutionary Federation (ARF) Artsakh released additional details about the beating of Pavel Manukian by Mountainous Karabagh Republic authorities, and demanded that those guilty of the crime be punished according to the law. "Pavel Manukian, a candidate running for MKR National Assembly, remains in stable condition, after being beaten on June 21 in MKR's Defense Ministry offices." The ARF press release states that Manukian has been transferred from the critical care unit to the regular section of the hospital, though he suffers severe headaches. Manukian's wife has asked that he be transferred to a hospital in Yerevan, but the request has been denied by a military judge, who cited the unstable condition of the patient. Mrs. Manukian on Wednesday filed a plea in MKR Superior Court, for a criminal investigation into the beating incident, directly implicating MKR Defense Minister Seyran Ohanian and his deputy Samuel Garabedian in the beating. She also named generals A. Haroutunian, V. Balayan, and M. Hagopian as participants. Manukian's fiery speeches during election campaigning evidently prompted the beating. Manukian, a prominent participant of the war with Azerbaijan, bashed the meddling of the commanders of MKR's army in the electoral process, accusing them of voter intimidation and coercion. In a declaration to various political parties in Karabagh, the ARF and Movement 88 parties stated on Wednesday, "We view the severe beating of the candidate for National Assembly in the offices of the Defense Ministry, as a grave crime--one that landed him in the military hospital with life threatening injuries. The fact that this act--organized by the country's military sector--has been overlooked by the legal entities, and that no criminal investigation has been launched, allows us to question the authority of the country's legal sector, as well as the public's faith in it. `We view the freedom of expression as one of the most valuable of democratic principles. Political forces reject coercion, as well as the insolent trampling of the human honor and dignity, acts which can lead to civil unrest, and ultimately cause instability in the country. `We find that the only correct direction for the president of our country to take, is to strive to implement all means to maintain lawfulness, in order to ensure internal accord, to have a handle political `excesses,' and to not compromise our unrecognized country's international standing." With plans to release their own statement, the Artsakh Democratic Party and Free Homeland party refused to sign the declaration. 2) New Jersey Recognizes Armenian Genocide Commission on Holocaust Education Approves Armenian Genocide Curriculum TRENTON--New Jersey's General Assembly voted 79 to 0 on June 22 approving of a joint resolution commemorating the 90th anniversary of the Armenian genocide, while the state-appointed Commission on Holocaust Education announced a comprehensive curriculum on the Armenian genocide. The resolution, which was sponsored by State Assembly members Joan Voss (D-38) and Robert Gordon (D-38), honors the memory of the 1.5 million Armenians who were killed by the Ottoman Turks. "This joint resolution recognizes the 90th anniversary of the Armenian Genocide and acknowledges the criminal mistreatment of the Armenians by the governments of the Ottoman Empire as an issue of international and historic significance," it says, in part. "Man's inhumanity to man knows no bounds," said Voss, whose comments were echoed by Gordon, and Assemblymen William Payne (D-29), Bill Baroni (R-14), and former Assembly Speaker Chuck Haytaian. New Jersey officials have played a strong role in spearheading human rights education since 1982, which has led to the inclusion of Armenian genocide studies as part of the statewide curriculum. The action, announced by the New Jersey Commission on Holocaust Education (NJCHE), marks the first time that a stand-alone curriculum on the Armenian genocide will be incorporated in US public and private schools. The new curriculum consists of the resource book on the Armenian genocide developed by the Facing History and Ourselves Foundation (FHAO) titled "Crimes Against Humanity and Civilization: the Genocide of the Armenians," which will be distributed to middle and high schools throughout New Jersey, along with a guide to teachers prepared by the NJCHE. 3) Homenetmen Establishes New Chapter in Hungary BUDAPEST--As the Armenian community of Budapest was celebrating the 87th anniversary of Armenia's First Independence Day on May 28, they had cause for another momentous celebration as a new chapter was added to the Homenetmen family. More than 120 youth, alongside 32 members from Homenetmen Vienna chapter, assembled in Budapest's City Hall to mark the occasion while Adam Sarksian emceed and Homenetmen Vienna chapter's Chairperson Rima Paroyan gave the keynote address. Homenetmen Western Region Central Committee member Manuel Marselian was present to convey the organization's message. Speaking about the importance of passing on Homenetmen's legacy to the youth of tomorrow, Marselian said, "Though it might be easy to create a new chapter, the real challenge comes when the youth work together, through self-sacrifice, to strengthen and preserve our Armenian identity." Praising the determination of the Hungary chapter, Marselian then introduced the chapter's first elected executive, presenting them with the organization's by-laws and constitution, as well as the Homenetmen flag. The 2005 executive members are Nigoghos Hagopian, Hayastan Aghegian, Gagik Jotian, Adam Sarksian, Haroutioun Papzapanian, Ermani Mardaian, and Lilit Outamian. The chapter will begin its activities by developing the athletics division, while a scouting division will be formed in the future. 4) ARF Youth Delegates Discuss Genocide at IUSY Conference in Turkey YEREVAN (Yerkir)--Armenian youth who recently attended a youth conference in Turkey, told a news conference in Yerevan on Thursday that they spoke openly about the Armenian genocide and even distributed booklets to participants. The two Armenian Youth Federation of Armenia participants, Zinavor Meghrian and Karen Mnatsakanian, along with AYF delegates Talline Tachdjian (France), and Khatchik Mouradian (Lebanon) attended the International Union of Socialist Youth (IUSY) meeting June 16-19, and were interviewed by the Turkish newspaper, Milliyet. "We discussed the Armenian genocide from different angles during the interview," Meghrian told the news conference. "We also spoke of the closed borders and formation of a group of [Turkish] historians, to review Genocide "allegations;" we told the paper we reject this idea, since we have no doubt about facts concerning the Genocide." Mnatsakanian revealed that Turkish youth wrongly assumed that the Armenian government is not concerned about the Genocide issue, but that only diaspora Armenians pursue it. "It is because some young Armenian politicians make such statements," he said. Asked to name those politicians, Mnatsakanian said he was referring to Sargis Asatrian, the chairman of the Armenian Youth Party. Participants of the IUSY conference, "We all are Minorities," included delegations from Georgia, Russia, Ukraine, Azerbaijan, Turkey, Bulgaria, Moldova, Serbia, Sweden, and other countries. All subscription inquiries and changes must be made through the proper carrier and not Asbarez Online. ASBAREZ ONLINE does not transmit address changes and subscription requests. (c) 2005 ASBAREZ ONLINE. All Rights Reserved. ASBAREZ provides this news service to ARMENIAN NEWS NETWORK members for academic research or personal use only and may not be reproduced in or through mass media outlets.

WWW.ASBAREZ.COM

Three Large Hydro Power Plants Are To Be Built in Armenia

THREE LARGE HYDRO POWER PLANTS ARE TO BE BUILT IN ARMENIA TILL 2025,
AREG GALSTIAN INFORMS
YEREVAN, JUNE 23. ARMINFO. In accordance with the strategy of energy
development approved by Armenian Government, three large hydro power
plants are to be built in the republic till 2025, Deputy Energy
Minister of Armenia Areg Galstian informed during the briefing,
Thursday.
According to him, the largest HPP of Meghri with the capacity of 140
MW and productivity of 850 mln kW/h, as well as the Lori-Berd HPP with
the capacity of 60-75 MW and productivity of 214 mln kW/h of
electricity are to be built in the period from 2011 to 2016. And
construction of Shnokh HPP is to be built from 2017 to 2025. For
attraction of investments to the construction of the Shnokh HPP the
Armenian Government has appealed to Norway for assistance. The
increase of the hydropotential of the republic is connected with the
necessity of increase of the energy security and independence of
Armenia, Sargsian said.

Negotiation on Financing of Construction of Second Section

NEGOTIATION ON FINANCING OF CONSTRUCTION OF SECOND SECTION
OF GAS PIPE-LINE IRAN-ARMENIA TO BE FINISHED SOON
YEREVAN, JUNE 23. ARMINFO. The negotiations on financing of the
construction of the second section of the gas pipe-line Iran-Armenia
will be over in the nearest future. Deputy Energy Minister of Armenia
Areg Galstian informed journalists during the briefing, Thursday.
According to him, this project is basic in the concept of the energy
development of Armenia till 2025, approved by the Government of the
republic Thursday. It is divided into two sections on probation – the
first one from Meghri to Kajaran, and the second – from Kajaran to
Ararat. The construction of the first section, which is being
continued intensively, started in Nov of last year. It is implemented
through the credit of Iran’s Government worth $30 mln. The Iranian
company Sanir is the general contractor is the project. The deputy
minister reminded that the whole project will be implemented till
2007. Negotiations for attraction of investors for construction of
the second section are in process now.
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Proposals of Turkish and Azerbaijani Delegations to PACE

PROPOSALS OF TURKISH AND AZERBAIJANI DELEGATIONS TO PACE RESOLUTION ON
CONSTITUTIONAL REFORMS IN ARMENIA FAIL
YEREVAN, JUNE 23. ARMINFO. Proposals of PACE Committee for Juridical
Affairs and Human Rights to the PACE Resolution on Constitutional
Reforms in Armenia on deprivation of the Armenian delegation of its
powers at PACE in case of failing the constitutional reforms was
cancelled at today’s session of PACE, the Council of Europe informs
ARMINFO.
At the same time, the second proposal of the Committee on inclusion of
a provision in the resolution saying that the elaborated Constitution
of Armenia is to come into effect within the shortest terms was
included in the resolution. In their turn, the Turkish and Azerbaijani
delegations to PACE made a proposal to include a provision in the
resolution obliging Armenia to include a point on recognition of the
present borders of its neighbors in the draft constitutional
reforms. However, not only Armenian delegation but also Rapporteur on
the monitoring n Armenia Jerzy Jaskiernia and British MP Jane Griffits
came out against this proposal. As a result, the proposal was failed.
It should be noted that the explanation norms of PACE Resolution on
Constitutional Reforms in Armenia say that the Armenian authorities
referred to the necessity of a detailed discussion of the document
with Venice experts to postpone the referendum, hereby applying a
tactics of “Ping-Pong” to postpone the referendum. In this connection,
the document says tat Armenia cannot further delay the referendum, it
must announce it at least in November 2005. The norms also demand
Armenia to adopt the proposals of PACE Venice Commission on Freedom of
Mass Media, in particular, with respect to A1+ and Noyyan Tapan TV
companies.
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

How should Turkey face genocide charges?

KurdishMedia, UK
June 23 2005
How should Turkey face genocide charges?

23/06/2005 Bianet.org – By Tolga Korkut

Academics urge the government prepare “facing the past” vis-a-vis
“Armenian Genocide” charges in the Ottoman Empire. Macar advises the
state give up denial, while Caglar points to the fact that Turkey
needs to consider international community.
BIA (Istanbul) – As Turkish leaders angrily rebuff the recent German
Parliament decision calling Turkey recognize `Armenian Genocide’ in
1915, political scientists Prof. Baskin Oran of the Ankara University
and Associate Prof. Elcin Macar of the Yildiz Technical University,
are of the opinion that German parliament’s is a political call,
which bears no legal obligation for the Turkish Republic.
According to Turkish academics the main question here is: What does
it mean for the Turkish Republic to take historic responsibility for
the 1915 Armenian expulsion.
However Prof Bakir Caglar of Istanbul University is of the opinion
that `recognition of genocide’ would bring in its wake certain `legal
responsibilities’ for Turkey.
Facing the past
Recalling refusals and threats by the government directed at
academics who urge for an open discussion of the issue, Turkey has to
stop preventing public discussions on the Armenian problem, Macar,
told bianet.
“The state has to give up claiming that such a thing never happened,
embracing this as the official argument, and being a side in the
discussion,’ said Macar. `If you are for leaving the issue to
historians, then you should really leave it to historians. You can’t
prevent discussions.’
`Saying that `we have opened the archives’ means `let us look into
the truth because we don’t know the truth.’ But the Turkish state is
continuing to act as if it knows the truth,’ said Macar.
The German parliament has made the following calls on the German
government:
* The German government should help the Turkish Grand National
Assembly, the
Turkish government and the Turkish society to face its past,
* It should help set up a commission of Turkish and Armenian
historians,
* It should have the archives, which were sent from Germany to
Turkey,
opened to public,
* It should demand that the canceled Armenian conference takes place,
* It should contribute to the normalization of relations between
Turkey and
Armenia.
Oran: How can members of the `deep state’ in 1915 be defended?
Baskin Oran of Ankara University argues that the `individuals, not
institutions or states, are responsible for the genocide.’
Oran underlined the fact that the Turkish Republic is the state which
demolished the Ottoman Empire: `The Turkish Republic has not taken
upon itself anything of the Ottoman Empire, except for the `Duyun-u
Umumiye, the public debt owed by the Empire to individuals. And it
was normal for the Republic to take that debt upon itself. For,
otherwise it would have remained outside the international system.’
`I don’t understand why the Republic of Turkey, who has crushed the
Ottoman Empire, is now coming into the defense of the `Teskilati
Mahsusa’ (Special Forces) henchmen of the `deep state’ of 1915, and
the deep state itself,’ said Oran. `The Republic of Turkey has no
legal responsibility.’
Apologizing
According to Elcin Macar, Turks may apologize for the deportation of
Armenians in 1915 and express that this was a mistake of their
ancestors.
`If Turkey apologizes, it would be in the form of: `We apologize for
what our ancestors have done,” said Macar.
According to Oran however, the state must first apologize to the
Turkish public.
`If the Republic of Turkey is going to apologize, it should first
apologize to the Turkish public,’ said Oran. `For having masked the
issue for all these decades, for not discussing it, and for banning
the discussions.’
International law issues
According to Prof. Bakir Caglar of the Political Sciences Department
of Istanbul University, settling accounts with the past isn’t
something that can be done on one’s own. `This can only be possible
through means and groundwork of international law,’ said Caglar.
Caglar said in the face of increasing number of parliament decisions
across Europe the issue gains three dimensions in terms of
international law:
* The recognition of the genocide becoming a legal responsibility.
* The issue of insurance: The international companies that assumed
the insurances of Armenian property are still operational. The legal
procedure on the issue is continuing in the United States.
*Property in land: It is certain that real estate belonging to
Armenians were seized. This is a legal problem for Turkey. (TK)
BIA News Centre
21/06/2005