Is Armenia ready for a “civilized divorce” with Russia? expert (question:

Photo: RBK

The recent tensions and diplomatic rearrangements in Armenian-Russian relations continue to be at the core of the political agenda. The statements made after the Moscow meeting of the leaders of Armenia and Russia at the beginning of May regarding the possible resumption of military-technical cooperation raise new questions. Parallel to them, the restrictions applied to Armenian products in the Russian market, in particular, “Jermuk” and the theses about “civilized demarriage” sounding from Moscow circles suggest deep and complex processes.


Is official Yerevan changing the foreign political vector, or is what is being done purely in the logic of tactical steps? What messages does the Kremlin send to the authorities of Armenia, and what is the price of a possible break in relations with Russia? On these and other key topics VERELQtalked to a political analyst Hakob Badalyan with.



 


Hakob Badalyan is in the photo, source: yerkir.am


VERELQ. Mr. Badalyan, after his visit to Moscow and meeting with Vladimir Putin on May 8, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan announced that Armenia and Russia agreed to resume military-technical cooperation in certain directions, without going into details. Taking into account the tension of recent years and the well-known problems related to the supply of weapons from Russia, what does this statement and agreement indicate from a purely political point of view? Does this mean that the Armenian-Russian military-technical cooperation is reviving?


Hakob Badalyan. If this statement is really followed by practical steps, and if this was not just a situational move aimed at dispelling the concerns of the Armenian public about the deterioration of relations with the Russian Federation (which are directly related to economic and social problems), then we can record that this period of pause or idleness is coming to an end, and we are returning to a cooperative regime. In any case, since there were no objections or denials from Moscow, it is quite possible that the parties really discussed specific details.


It is clear that this gap in the past period was largely due to the fact that Russia directed all its resources to meet its own military needs. Now, it is possible that this acute demand on the Ukrainian front has somewhat decreased. On the other hand, Russia has recently multiplied the production volumes and rates of its military industry, which has opened up new opportunities for export as well.


VERELQ. It is understandable. In this context, let’s also refer to other recent developments. Against the background of the summit of the European political community and especially the trilateral meeting of Armenia-EU-USA on April 5, we saw rather harsh reactions of Russia. This was followed by the incident related to “Jermuk” mineral water, when the sale of a large batch was suddenly banned in the Russian Federation, allegedly due to phytosanitary problems. Considering that “Jermuk” is not only a well-known brand, but also its owner is considered a businessman with close ties to the current authorities, is this a purely economic issue or is it a clear political impulse aimed at the authorities of Armenia?


Hakob Badalyan. In the case of Russia, of course, it is very difficult to believe that such decisions are made purely based on phytosanitary considerations. When such partial, targeted restrictions are applied, they most likely have political motives. In my estimation, ahead of the geopolitical realignments and the upcoming pre-election phase in Armenia, Russia is simply trying to raise the price of its interests with concrete actions.


Seeing how other major players are taking a direct and open role in Armenia’s political processes, Moscow is trying to keep up. With concrete steps aimed at protecting his interests, he shows Yerevan that his warnings are not only verbal, and he will not hesitate to resort to painful actions. I think that this impulse is hidden behind the “Jermuk” case, and the fact that you mentioned that the owners of the company are among the big businessmen who work closely with the current government of Armenia is not a coincidence either.


VERELQ. And how are these harsh impulses of the Russian side and steps to increase the price of their own interests perceived in official Yerevan? Does the leadership of Armenia, which has recently been actively talking about diversification and looking for new security partners (for example, France, India), read those messages correctly?


Hakob Badalyan. If we are guided by the assumption that common sense has not yet left official Yerevan (and I am inclined to think that it has not, at least for now), then all of that is certainly taken into account. I am of the opinion that the impression of anti-Russianness in Yerevan’s policy is only tactical in nature and has not yet crossed the strategic red lines.


Yes, Russia regularly, especially now, in the conditions of these high stakes, reminds with concrete actions that crossing those strategic lines will have very serious consequences for Armenia. But, in my estimation, Yerevan has not yet crossed that line and, at least, I don’t see any significant intention to cross it yet.


VERELQ. Another remarkable episode. Recently, the Russian leadership and official circles have frequently discussed the topic of a possible break in Armenian-Russian relations. Reference is made both to Yerevan’s European integration aspirations and to the holding of a possible referendum. Even in open text, it is said that if Armenia really wants to go to the European Union, then it can be formulated as “elegant” or “civilized disobedience”. What do you think speaking in such an open text for the first time indicates?


Hakob Badalyan. I think this rhetoric also fits into the logic I mentioned: to raise the price of Russian interests in Armenia’s internal political and pre-election processes. Of course, there may be different nuances in the details, but the general goal is exactly that.


A lot will depend on further developments: how will the political processes in Armenia go, and what will be the behavior of the current government in the context of the election results? Will official Yerevan try to ensure the preservation of power at any cost, or will it come to terms with reality in case of an unfavorable result? Basically, Russia’s message, which was also noticeable in the footnotes of the official meetings, is that Moscow will reconcile with any result of the Armenian people’s election, if it is achieved in a legitimate electoral struggle. However, it is expected that Yerevan will also have to come to terms with that result, even if it implies the loss of power for Nikol Pashinyan.


VERELQ. Going back to the last point you mentioned and the idea of ​​”civilized divorce”. Considering the deep dependence of our economy on the Russian market, energy carriers and infrastructure, does Armenia today have the resources and is it ready for a final showdown with Russia? And is Russia ready to let us go in a “civilized” way?


Hakob Badalyan. Again, if we rely on common sense, Armenia has reason to be seriously concerned here. Regardless of whether this divorce will be “civilized” or not, it will seriously and very painfully hit Armenia’s socio-economic capabilities and vital interests. This will directly mean that Armenia will become much more vulnerable to Azerbaijan and Turkey, both in terms of economic needs and, therefore, in terms of political and security.


Therefore, we should not be interested in whether Russia is ready for a civilized divorce, but we should do everything so that the situation does not reach that fateful point. At the moment, Armenia has no tangible dividends or equivalent alternatives in any other direction that would compensate for these huge losses. Instead, in the event of such a rupture, we will receive challenges of a much tougher and completely new nature.

Verelq: By not participating in the election, by not standing next to each other, they are not out of this situation

We cannot get out of this situation by not participating in the election, by not standing next to each other. This cannot continue, this is the problem of our honor, the problem of our future. This was announced by PAP leader Gagik Tsarukyan during the campaign in Hrazdan.


According to him, today we are on this law for incorrect appointments. He reminded that in the past, during the USSR, people traveled a long way, formed a trajectory, reached a new position, and today there are people who have not done anything for fifty years, have not left a stone unturned, but one is a minister. It can’t be like that.


Referring to the main thesis of the government – peace, and the nail of his pre-election program – guaranteed peace, Gagik Tsarukyan noted.


“What is the peace? They have an agreement with Aliyev, but there is no signed document, he also demands that you should warm up, Kyark should be warmed, 300,000 Azerbaijanis should come to Armenia… yesterday he also said that after the elections RA should change the Constitution, those 300,000 Azerbaijanis should come. Our people of Artsakh have left everything, house, place, possessions and came here, there is no place to live, but there is no question of going there. How is this possible? For this, a guaranteed peace, which means a peace treaty signed by the mediation of major states, where everything will be fixed in black and white, is a priority. And whoever violated will be punished. That’s when we close the doors to war.”


Tsarukyan added that the weak always give in, so it’s not enough to say that they brought peace.


“If people want to live peacefully and prosperously, there should be guaranteed peace for that,” he added.


Details in the video

Asbarez: Turkish Journalists Visit Gyumri, Armenia-Turkey Border

Turkish journalists visit Armenia-Turkey border


A group of Turkish journalists visited Gyumri after participating in the European Political Community summit and the “Yerevan Dialogue Forum” in Yerevan.

They visited the Gyumri-Kars railway area, reviewed plans for the resumption of the railway, and spoke on the spot about the importance of reopening the border checkpoint, the Ermenihaber news agency reported.

At the Armenian-Turkish border, they met with Levon Barseghyan, the director of Gyumri’s “Asparez” Press Club (no affiliation with this publication, eds.), and discussed the importance of reopening the border.

Barseghyan noted that the Akhurik station of Armenia was part of the Cold War-era railway network and that this station is the last point leading from Armenia to Turkey and from there to Europe. According to Barseghyan, it can become part of the Middle Corridor between Asia and Europe.

He recalled that this route operated during the Soviet era and remained open for one year, in 1992-93. According to him, the reopening of the border could significantly affect the development of trade and relations between Armenia and Turkey. Barseghyan added that this would benefit not only Turkey and Armenia, but also neighboring countries.

Putin Suggests ‘Divorce’ From Armenia, as Kremlin Steps Up Pressure on Yereva

Russian President Vladimir Putin addresses a Victory Parade in Moscow on May 9


President Vladimir Putin of Russia proposed what he called a “mutually beneficial divorce” with Armenia, given Yerevan’s mixed signals about joining the European Union and remaining in the Eurasian Economic Union, which Moscow has warned would not be an option.

The Kremlin on Monday insisted that Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan answer for allowing President Vlodymyr Zelenskyy of Ukraine to make anti-Russian comments in Yerevan when he attended the European Political Community summit there last week.

Putin made the comments on Armenia’s choice during celebrations over the weekend marking the Soviet Victory over the Nazis. Pashinyan announced that he would not attend the parade and other events in Moscow.
“In my opinion, it would be right for both the citizens of Armenia and us as their main economic partner to make a decision as soon as possible,” Putin told reporters.

“For example, by holding a referendum. It’s not our business, but it would be entirely logical to hold a referendum and ask Armenia’s citizens about their choice. Accordingly, we would draw conclusions and go down the path of a gentle, amicable and mutually beneficial divorce,” the Russian leader proposed.

Putin indicated that he will bring up the matter at the next EEU summit which is scheduled to take place in Kazakhstan on May 28, less than two weeks before Armenia’s parliamentary elections.

Pashinyan objected to the term “divorce” used by Putin when speaking to reporters during a campaign event for his Civil Contract Party.

“Until the moment when there is a need to make a choice, we will not put such an issue on the agenda,” Pashinyan said. “I also disagree with the term divorce. I had the opportunity to say in the National Assembly that we sometimes confuse interstate relations with marriage.”

Announcing that he would not attend the upcoming EEU summit in Astana, Kazakhstan, Pashinyan said he had spoken to Putin about Armenia’s role in the Russia-led economic alliance.

“We are a full member of the EEU, we fully participate in all decision-making. We have no intention of harming Russia’s interests,” Pashinyan added.

Putin again emphasized on Saturday Armenia’s “heavy dependence on Russia” for trade and energy, which he said has deepened during Pashinyan’s eight-year rule.

“Our trade with Armenia decreased last year, and the year before it was much higher, but it was still $7 billion in 2025,” Putin said. “Considering that the country’s GDP is $29 billion, this is a significant figure. Armenia gains significant advantages within the Eurasian Economic Union framework.”

Putin also pointed out that Russia’s conflict with Ukraine broke out after Kyiv’s decision to seek EU membership.

The Kremlin on Monday said that it is extremely important for Moscow that Armenia does act against Russia.

Spealing to Russian journalist Pavel Zarubin, the Kremlin’s press secretary Dmitry Peskov said it is a priority for Moscow to ensure that Yerevan does not hinder ties, when commenting about the EU summit held in Yerevan.

Peskov also added that Moscow does not understand why Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan did not “balance” Zelenskyy’s “anti-Russian” statements in Yerevan.

“We do not understand why anti-Russian statements are being made from the territory of Armenia. We do not understand this. And why the head of the Armenian government did not try to balance this in any way through his statements. So far, we cannot explain this,” Peskov said.

“Judging by the fact that a platform was provided for anti-Russian statements [in Yerevan], and judging by the fact that there were no balancing statements from the Armenian leadership, this opens up an additional field for analysis,” Peskov added.

Armenia has the right to hold any event, including a summit with the EU, but Moscow considers it unacceptable that its ally Yerevan provides a platform for Vladimir Zelenskyy to make anti-Russian statements, the Kremlin press secretary stressed.

Pashinyan told reporters on Monday that it was not his place to counter Zelenskyy’s statements in Yerevan.

Pashinyan added that the summit of the European Political Community is a multilateral platform, and the venue of the meeting should not play a role in statements emanating from those attending the gathering.

“This event is as much my event as it is the event of our other partners. I do not think that as the head of the host country, I should censor or necessarily respond to everything. It is a multilateral platform, and people should express themselves within that platform,” Pashinyan noted.

He claimed that there have been instances when the Russian president had made statements about the leaders of various countries in his presence. “But I don’t recall that they expected me to respond to those statements,” Pashinyan added.

“We are a member country of the European Political Community, a member country of the EEU, but that doesn’t mean that we pretend to interfere in all world affairs,” Pashinyan said.

Dr. Carolyn Kaloostian Announces Candidacy for Glendale City Council

Dr. Carolyn Kaloostian


Dr. Kaloostian is running for City Council to bring a practical, evidence-based approach to local government, with a central focus on strengthening the health of the City at every level. Her leadership emphasizes listening to residents’ concerns first, identifying root causes, and delivering data-backed global best practices that strengthen public safety, enhance city services, advance walkable streets, and improve urban design to enhance quality of life in Glendale.

Drawing on her experience in systems thinking and public health science, she seeks to connect the City with innovative resources and advanced technologies that support transparent governance, resilient infrastructure, and the long-term safety, health, and well-being of the entire community.

“As a physician, I am trained to listen carefully, evaluate evidence, and make decisions that protect people’s well-being,” said Dr. Kaloostian. “I am running because I believe those same principles should guide our city.”

Her decision to run was shaped by conversations with patients, families, and small business owners who expressed frustration about rising utility bills, housing affordability pressures, and not always feeling informed when policies impact their daily lives. As both a physician and a mother, she understands how deeply these issues affect families.

Public Safety
A proud safety-first candidate, Dr. Carolyn Kaloostian’s top priorities include preserving Glendale’s reputation as one of the safest cities not only in Los Angeles County, but in the nation. She supports this commitment through strong investment in police and fire services, prevention-focused public health and community safety strategies, modern technology and emergency preparedness, safe and walkable streets, and coordinated citywide systems that address root causes before crises occur.

Small Business Support
Dr. Carolyn Kaloostian has pledged to donate her entire Glendale City Council salary to an independent community microfund that will provide renovation and improvement grants to small businesses. She plans to launch a Small Business Health and Stability Initiative aimed at reducing bureaucratic barriers, supporting façade improvements, and strengthening Glendale’s commercial corridors. Thriving small businesses are the heartbeat of Glendale’s economic vitality and essential to maintaining vibrant, walkable neighborhoods and a resilient local economy.

Infrastructure & Utilities
Kaloostian proposes to ncreasing oversight and transparency regarding utility costs, infrastructure investments, and long-term planning to ensure responsible stewardship of public resources. Dr. Kaloostian supports increasing the supply of power through technology that turns waste into energy and creating small, local power networks called microgrids that can keep the lights on even if the main power fails. Piezoelectirc energy harvesting can also use sensors built into the ground that turns the pressure from passing vehicles into energy.

Transparency & Accountability
She vows to improve public communication and engagement so that residents impacted by policy decisions are informed and heard early in the process. Governance should feel collaborative, not imposed. As a physician and researcher, Dr. Kaloostian is committed to collecting and analyzing data, presenting multiple viable policy alternatives, and ensuring that residents most directly affected have a meaningful voice in shaping the solutions that are ultimately implemented.

Environmental Sustainability
Kaloostian want to promote practical, fiscally responsible sustainability initiatives that enhance safety, walkability, and community health without increasing unnecessary burdens on residents. This includes strategic planting of pollinator-friendly, native, and non-invasive trees and flowering species that help reduce common air and water pollutants through phytoremediation, as well as implementing permeable alleyway and green infrastructure projects to reduce over-concretization, improve groundwater infiltration, mitigate urban flooding risks, and help prevent long-term soil instability and sinkholes.

Armenian-American Community Priorities
Kaloostian said she is committed to keeping Glendale a safe, family-friendly city while honoring and supporting its vibrant Armenian-American community. She supports cultural preservation through Armenian institutions, schools, and churches, along with the advancement of Armenian history education initiatives, recognition of the Armenian Genocide, and strengthened civic and sister-city partnerships with Armenia. Dr. Kaloostian recognizes the importance of cultural visibility, humanitarian awareness regarding Armenia and Artsakh, and continued civic engagement to ensure Glendale’s Armenian-American community remains a vital part of the City’s identity and long-term prosperity.

In her statement, Kaloostian said her vision is to Heal Glendale Together by strengthening the health of the City body at every level, from public safety and infrastructure to economic vitality, environmental quality, and community well-being. Guided by her medical and public health background, she is committed to transparent, evidence-based leadership that supports safe neighborhoods, walkable streets, health-focused urban design, thriving small businesses, clean air and water, and meaningful civic engagement. By honoring Glendale’s cultural heritage while planning responsibly for the future, Dr. Kaloostian seeks to build a healthier, safer, and more resilient Glendale for generations to come.

Dr. Carolyn Kaloostian, a third-generation Californian, has dedicated her career to turning expertise into action. A board-certified Family and Geriatric Medicine physician, public health leader, and Associate Professor at the Keck School of Medicine of USC, she is running for Glendale City Council to bring practical, results-driven leadership to local government.

UCLA-trained with a Doctorate of Medicine and a Masters in Public Health, Dr. Kaloostian has advanced prevention and community-based health solutions, working alongside the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health and helping develop the County’s strategic plan for dementia care through the Healthy Brain Coalition. Through her leadership with the American Heart Association, she received awards for helping train over 250,000 residents in bystander CPR.

Raised in a family rooted in service and educated in Armenian schools, she was inspired by her late mother, one of the first seven students at Ferrahian Armenian School and a founding contributor to the Armenian Bone Marrow Donor Registry. She is committed to strengthening Glendale with integrity and collaboration, thoughtfully guiding growth, preserving its historic character, and protecting safety and quality of life.

Asbarez: L.A. County Sheriff Luna Visits Western Prelate

Sheriff Robert Luna meets with Western Prelate Archbishop Kegham Khacherian on May 8


Los Angeles County Sheriff Robert Luna on Friday paid a courtesy visit to Western Prelate Archbishop Kegham Kacherian.

Sheriff Luna was accompanied by his staff and security personnel, while Western Prelacy Executive Council members Jack Hadinjian and Ronnie Gharibian also attended the meeting.

Luna, who commands the nation’s largest sheriff department, to the Prelate that the purpose of his visit was to become better acquainted with Archbishop Khacherian. He praised the spiritual and community-centered mission of the Western Prelacy and congratulated Archbishop Khacherian on his election as Prelate of the Western Prelacy, extending his heartfelt best wishes.

Archbishop Khacherian, in turn, shared his appreciation for the Sheriff’s visit and highly commended the important public safety mission and community service carried out by the department for the well-being and safety of the residents of Los Angeles County. The Prelate also expressed his strong commitment to cooperating and collaborating with the Sheriff’s Department.

At the conclusion of the meeting, Archbishop Khacherian conveyed his support for the initiatives and programs of the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department and wished Sheriff Luna and his team continued success in their mission. The Prelate then offered blessings to Sheriff Luna and his delegation.

CC: What six months in Armenia revealed to this photography duo


California Courier Online, May 11, 2026

California
Courier Online, May 11, 2026

1- Cong. Fine Should be Kicked Out of Congress

For his Anti-Armenian Racist Remarks
By Harut
Sassounian

2- Armenia And The Disappearing Mountain
3- My speech at the Diaspora Mobilization Conference in Paris, April 11-12, 2026
4- Pashinyan announces legal action against Samvel Karapetyan over psychedelic mushroom claims
5- Most popular baby names revealed in Armenia
6- Washington summit opened new chapter in Azerbaijan – U.S. partnership
7- Now is the time for a US ‘grand deal’ with Azerbaijan

******************************************************************************************************************

1- Cong. Fine Should be Kicked Out of Congress

For his Anti-Armenian Racist Remarks

By Harut Sassounian
www.TheCaliforniaCourier.com

Randy Fine, a Jewish-American Republican Congressman from Florida, made a highly insulting remark by telling the audience on a nationwide podcast — the Jenny Beth Show — on April 30, “We don’t want Armenians to be able to serve in Congress.”

Cong. Fine made this controversial comment while criticizing Dan Bilzerian, a social media influencer with 29.6 million Instagram followers and a U.S. veteran, who is running against him in the Republican Primary in Florida. Pres. Trump has endorsed Fine, calling him a “MAGA Warrior.”

Fine said that Bilzerian “lives in Las Vegas when he’s not in his foreign country of Armenia. But you know, he’s just a terrible anti-Semite. I think what he’s trying to show is that this group of hate-filled lunatics and losers can take hold in the Republican Party…. The little Armenian said, I think that President Trump was a pedophile rapist who should be impeached. That’s not a winning argument. It may work in Armenia, where he’s from, but that’s not an argument. That’s not gonna work in the United States. So, it’s bad. We have to take it seriously because we don’t want this to take root in our party. We don’t want Armenians to be able to serve in Congress. But I’m not gonna lose too much sleep about it.” Bilzerian is not from Armenia. He was born in Tampa, Florida, and became a dual citizen of Armenia in 2018.

If Cong. Fine had simply criticized Bilzerian because he did not like his controversial views, that would have been understandable. However, targeting all Armenians because of his disagreement with one Armenian-American is completely unacceptable and foolish. This is pure and simple racism. Fine was rebuked by several members of Congress, including Cong. Brad Sherman (Democrat-CA), Cong. Laura Friedman (Democrat-Ca), Cong. Brendan Boyle (Democrat-PA), and Cong. Delia Ramirez (Democrat-Illinois). Fine was also criticized by several members of the U.S. media, and online commentators.

“This isn’t just racist — it’s disqualifying,” stated ANCA National Grassroots Director Gev Iskajyan. “Saying Armenians shouldn’t be allowed to serve in Congress is blatant bigotry. No elected official who traffics in this kind of hate should be running for office.”

Rather than apologizing for his unsavory remarks, Fine doubled down on his insults by posting on X two days later: “Armenians should not serve in Congress. Neither should Somalis. Or Guatemalans. Or — wait for it — Israelis.” He made matters worse by adding several other nationalities to his racist remarks.

How would Jewish Cong. Fine feel if someone says: “We don’t want Jews to be able to serve in Congress?” I am sure all hell would break loose. There would be nationwide condemnation of that person for being blatantly anti-Semitic. And if such a racist thing was said by an incumbent member of Congress, there would have been calls for his immediate resignation. The least Congress should do now is strip Fine of his membership on the prestigious House Foreign Affairs Committee.

I disagree with a lot of the controversial things Bilzerian says about Jews, such as calling Cong. Fine “a fat Jew.” The Israeli government has ranked Bilzerian number one on its list of the 10 most prominent anti-Semitic influencers.”

Cong. Fine himself “has a long history of making bigoted comments about Muslims, and suggested in 2025 that nuclear weapons should be dropped on Gaza. He has also used racist and Islamophobic language toward Muslim politicians in the U.S., such as New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani, whom he called ‘little more than a Muslim terrorist’, adding that his citizenship should be stripped and he ‘should be deported to the Ugandan shithole he came from,’” Nate Ostiller reported in OC Media.

Fine introduced last October the “Disqualifying Dual Loyalty Act” (H.R. 5817), but Congress has not taken any action on his proposal. Serving as a dual citizen in the U.S. Congress is not against the law and cannot be an excuse for making racist comments about such individuals.

Over the years, many dual citizens have served in Congress, such as Sen. Ted Cruz who held joint U.S. and Canadian citizenship until 2014, and Congresswoman Michele Bachman who held joint U.S. and Swiss citizenship until 2012.

There are several other serious problems with Cong. Fine. Along with  five other members of Congress, Fine is a cosponsor of H.R.6534, introduced by Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL), in the House Foreign Affairs Committee on Dec. 9, 2025. If adopted, H. R. 6534 would repeal Section 907 of the FREEDOM Support Act and lift longstanding restrictions on U.S. assistance to Azerbaijan, including providing military weapons.

Doing further research using the recently formed website GovItUp.com, I discovered that Ezra Friedlander, the principal of the Friedlander Consulting Group, a lobbying firm hired by Azerbaijan, donated $1,000 to Cong. Fine’s campaign on Sept. 18, 2025. In addition, the Friedlander firm reported to the U.S. Department of Justice that it had arranged two meetings in June and July 2025, for Nigar Shiralizade, Political Officer at Azerbaijan’s Embassy, and Sanan Farajov, Second Secretary of Azerbaijan’s Embassy, with Cong. Fine’s Chief of Staff, to discuss “U.S.-Azerbaijan relations.”

As the _expression_ goes, “People who live in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones at other houses.”

****************************************************************************************************************

2- Armenia And The Disappearing Mountain
RFE
Something seems to be missing from Armenias new biometric passport. That’s according to many in the country, who have flagged an unusual image in the document.

Among pages showcasing Armenia’s heritage and culture is a picture of Khor Virap. The 17th century monastery is famous largely for its spectacular backdrop of Mount Ararat. In the passport, however, the monastery is depicted from an angle showing only nondescript mountains on the horizon. Critics have called the unusual image a ploy to avoid including Ararat in the official document.

Mount Ararat is situated inside Turkey and officially known by its Turkish name Mount Agri, but the landmark rises prominently above Yerevan on clear days.

The 5,100 meter mountain was a part of ancient kingdoms of Armenia, but ethnic Armenians were driven from settlements around Ararat amid the Ottoman state-led killings, which have been recognized as genocide by dozens of countries including the United States. When borders in the region were redrawn following World War I, Ararat’s twin peaks were included within the eastern edge of modern Turkey.

Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian recently hinted at the controversy over the passport depiction of Khor Virap,saying during a live stream with Interior Minister Arpine Sargsian that, we’ve chosen such a perspective to suit our policies and what we have discussed for a long time.

Given it is the passport of the Republic of Armenia, Pashinian added, the passport reflects the territory of the Republic of Armenia.

The absence of the mountain in the passports, which are set to be rolled out in the fall of 2026, follows a government decision late last year to remove snow-capped icons of Mount Ararat from passport stamps. That decision led to an uproar in the country, including a lawsuit filed against the government.

Opposition politician Hayk Mamijanian condemned the removal of the mountain from passport stamps at the time, telling reporters it never ceases to amaze how zealously Pashinian is ready to please Turkey or Azerbaijan.”

Since Azerbaijan’s military recapture of the Nagorno-Karabakh region in 2023, Armenia has sought to normalize relations with neighboring Azerbaijan and Turkey, both historic foes of Armenia.

Armenia and Azerbaijan initialled a peace agreement in 2025 that includes a clause indefinitely forbidding either country from making territorial claims on the other. Turkey, a close ally of Baku, has long objected to Armenia’s use of Ararat as a national symbol, including in the coat of arms of the Soviet Republic of Armenia.

Joshua Kucera, a senior analyst for International Crisis Group, says the Khor Virap image appears to be, part of the larger real Armenia narrative that [Pashinian] is promoting, trying to refocus Armenians’ attentions to the issues within their own borders rather than historical Armenia outside its borders.

The Caucasus expert says that reframing effort also includes the recaptured Nagorno-Karabakh region of Azerbaijan.

Some fear a more consequential target for the Pashinian government could be the current Armenian coat of arms, which features Ararat as its centerpiece, topped with Noah’s Ark. The mythical vessel is believed by some Christians to have settled atop Mount Ararat following the biblical flood. In 2023, Pashinian criticized the emblem for representing “a dichotomy between historical Armenia and real Armenia.

Edmon Marukian, a politician and former ally of the Armenian prime minister, called the 2025 erasure of Mount Ararat from passport stamps a potential precursor to Armenias coat of arms being remade. Removing [Ararat] would require changing the constitution and the law, the politician noted, adding, are we, as citizens, ready to tolerate this?

In April, RFE/RL’s Armenian Service asked Pashinian about the potential for Ararat to be removed from the coat of arms. The prime minister responded only that “I am not raising such a question.”

********************************************************************************************************************

3- My speech at the Diaspora Mobilization Conference in Paris, April 11-12, 2026
By Harut Sassounian

Diaspora Armenians often proudly say, “Azerbaijan has oil, Georgia has a sea, and Armenia has a Diaspora.”
Unfortunately, until now, the potential of the Diaspora has not been fully utilized. Many measure the support of the Diaspora only in material terms, and for this reason some call the Diaspora a “cash cow.”
In 1997, the Armenian government approved the law on dual citizenship, an important step towards strengthening Diaspora-Armenia relations. Unfortunately, the government did not encourage Diaspora Armenians to become dual citizens of Armenia.
In 2008, President Serzh Sargsyan established the Ministry of Diaspora. I proudly served on the Board of the Ministry for ten years, from the day it was established until its closure in 2018.
When Nikol Pashinyan came to power, he closed the Ministry of Diaspora and appointed Zareh Sinanyan as High Commissioner for Diaspora Affairs. This was a hugely unsuccessful appointment, as Sinanyan destroyed the existing bridges between Armenia and the Diaspora.
Sinanyan ignored traditional Armenian organizations and parties and replaced them with individuals who have no influence in their communities but are supporters of Pashinyan.
Sinanyan wastes his time praising the Prime Minister and even suggesting that Arabs immigrate to Armenia, something that has nothing to do with Diaspora Armenians.
At the 2024 Diaspora-Armenia conference, Pashinyan surprisingly dared to tell the present Diaspora Armenians: “We do not need your humanitarian aid.”
These words caused deep offense, because he not only does not encourage the Diaspora, but also openly refuses their support.
During his eight years in office, Pashinyan has become a great disaster for Diaspora-Armenia relations.
He said in Istanbul that the Prime Minister of Armenia is not responsible for all Armenians around the world. “Don’t rely on me. Diaspora Armenians should solve their problems in their communities.”
And this week, Pashinyan declared, “There are some offices, groups, clubs in the Diaspora who claim to speak on behalf of the Diaspora. These people are not the Diaspora at all, they are no longer the overwhelming majority in the Diaspora, they are marginal organizations. And the Armenian government will have less to do with these organizations in general and will ultimately have nothing to do with them at all.” This approach completely undermines pan-Armenian unity.
In addition, Pashinyan has taken steps that belittle our national sanctities:
— Criticized Mount Ararat because it is outside the borders of Armenia.
— Criticized the lion on the coat of arms, not understanding that the lion is a symbol of courage.
— Criticized the national anthem.
— Gave up Artsakh, despite his 2018 statement that “Artsakh is Armenia and that’s it.”
— Ceded more than 200 sq. km. of Armenian territory to Azerbaijan.
— Did nothing to release the Artsakh leaders imprisoned in Baku.
— Considers the Artsakh issue closed and calls Artsakh Armenians “escapees.”
— Harshly criticizes the Armenian Apostolic Church and imprisons its clergy.
— Questions the veracity of the Armenian Genocide.
— Renames “Armenian History” textbooks “History of Armenia.”
— During his visits, he carries a map of “real Armenia” on his lapel, consigning historical Armenia to oblivion.
— Has compiled a blacklist for Diaspora Armenians who are banned from entering Armenia. My name is on that list. Armenia is not Pashinyan’s personal home to decide who can enter Armenia and who cannot.
Last week, Pashinyan’s Civil Contract party announced a new program to further divide the Diaspora. I quote: “Organize a conference of state-centered organizations of the Diaspora with the aim of adopting a concept of Armenia-Diaspora cooperation in peace and forming mechanisms for its implementation.”
With such steps, Pashinyan is concealing our national identity, history, and millennial heritage. The concessions he has made violate the laws and constitution of Armenia.
If Pashinyan remains at the head of government after the June 7 elections, the very existence of Armenia will be endangered.
Finally, I would like to present my proposal to unite the Diaspora in one sentence: “With the vision of uniting millions of our people in the Diaspora into one unified structure, I am trying to create a Diaspora Armenian Parliament with representatives elected by Diaspora Armenians.”

****************************************************************************************************************

******************************************************************************************************************

5- Most popular baby names revealed in Armenia

Panarmenian.net

Armenia’s Statistical Committee has published the list of the most frequently given names to newborns in 2025, topped by Nare for girls and Davit for boys.

The top ten female names also include Arpi, Luse, Maria, Angelina, Eva, Mane, Ameli, Mari, and Mariam.

The top ten male names also include Narek, Hayk, Robert, Mikael, Tigran, Mark, Areg, Leo, and Monte.

In 2025, a total of 15,246 girls and 16,796 boys were born in Armenia.

****************************************************************************************************************

6- Washington Summit Opened New Chapter in Azerbaijan-U.S. Partnership


By Alyona Pavlenko
30 Trend

LACHIN, Azerbaijan — A new momentum for cooperation has
emerged in the relations between Azerbaijan and the United States following the
Washington summit, Amy Carlon, U.S. Chargé d’Affaires in Azerbaijan, told
journalists on Saturday during a visit to East Zangezur and Karabakh, Trend
reports.

“I am very glad to have the opportunity to come to
this part of Azerbaijan. I have never been to Shusha or Lachin before, so I am
truly happy to be here and see the situation with my own eyes,” she said.

Carlon noted that since last year’s Washington summit, a
new impetus has been injected into the bilateral relationship. “Our focus
is on issues of connectivity, trade and economic development, as well as
cooperation in the fields of defense and security. Since the signing of the
agreement [Charter on Strategic Partnership], we have been engaging technical
specialists and other experts to implement concrete projects and advance this
cooperation in practice,” she added.

The visit of representatives of the diplomatic corps
accredited in Azerbaijan to East Zangezur and Karabakh commenced on May 1,
2026. The delegation is accompanied by Hikmet Hajiyev, Assistant to the
President of the Republic of Azerbaijan and Head of the Foreign Policy Affairs
Department of the Presidential Administration. More than 150 ambassadors,
diplomats, military attaches, and other representatives from 62 countries and
international organizations are participating in the trip.

This marks the 21st visit of the diplomatic corps to the
liberated territories. Such trips are of significant importance for forming an
objective understanding of the scale of projects being implemented and the
results achieved in the region. On the second day of the visit, the diplomatic
representatives visited the Lachin district.

******************************************************************************************************

7- Now is the time for a US ‘grand deal’ with Azerbaijan

By Andrew D’Anieri and Mercedes Sapuppo
Atlantic Council

Bottom lines up front

  • The Trump administration should propose a “grand deal” with Azerbaijan that lifts US arms sale restrictions in exchange for Baku releasing dozens of political prisoners.
  • This effort would build on the model the White House has used in talks with Belarus, which has released more than five hundred political prisoners.
  • Shifting US relations with Armenia and Azerbaijan, upcoming Armenian elections, and the need for a final peace agreement could make such a deal more likely to succeed.

WASHINGTON—The Trump administration’s dealmaking blitz with Belarus has secured the release of hundreds of detainees. By trading targeted sanctions relief for the release of political prisoners in Belarus, the White House has helped free more than five hundred people from unjust captivity. A similar deal with Azerbaijan in the South Caucasus would produce major rewards, with much less risk.

To pursue this “grand deal” in Azerbaijan, the Trump administration should work with Congress to propose ending a ban on arms sales to Baku in exchange for the release of unjustly detained individuals—some with US ties—sitting in the country’s jails. This is a rare moment for a bipartisan win-win and a relatively cost-free way to upgrade US relations with a key strategic energy and transport partner that borders both Iran and Russia. With proper timing, Armenia, too, could be supportive, if the release includes at least some Armenians currently held in Azerbaijan. 

What to do with Section 907

The Trump administration should engage Congress to resolve Baku’s number one concern on Capitol Hill: the repeal of Section 907 of the FREEDOM Support Act that bans US arms sales to Azerbaijan. Congress originally adopted the measure in 1992 to punish Azerbaijan’s treatment of Armenians in Karabakh and its blockade of Armenia. In 2001, the US Senate passed an amendment that allowed the White House to waive Section 907 restrictions. Almost every year since, both Republican and Democratic presidents have indeed waived Section 907. This renders the text inconsequential to the United States, but it is highly symbolic to Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev’s government, which views it as an impediment to closer relations with Washington.

Furthermore, the relationships between Washington, Baku, and Yerevan are changing. Armenia and Azerbaijan received unprecedented US attention when Vice President JD Vance became the highest-level US official to visit the countries in February, following the tripartite leader-level summit in Washington, DC in August 2025. In Yerevan, the vice president announced billions of dollars in nuclear energy support, talked up a major US-funded supercomputing project, and slipped in a tacit endorsement of Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan. Vance’s Baku visit saw an agreement for the United States to work with Azerbaijan in a range of areas, but no concrete agreement.

The timing of any deal is essential, and the next few months represent a unique opportunity. Armenia holds parliamentary elections on June 7, and Pashinyan may face a strong test in his reelection bid from pro-Russia parties skeptical of his efforts toward peace with Azerbaijan. The Kremlin is conducting an extensive fake news operation to undermine Pashinyan’s campaign. Officials and experts in Baku rightly see Pashinyan as their best chance to finally agree to a formal peace deal and may be inclined to furtively support his candidacy. What better way to defang Pashinyan’s pro-Russia detractors and maintain pathways to peace than to release high-profile Armenian prisoners ahead of the election? 

Additionally, Azerbaijan has found more support on the Republican side of the aisle in the United States and may want to move on the issue now while Congress is in GOP hands.  

That’s also why, with US midterm elections just six months away, the Trump administration may find it advantageous to push forward, as unified Republican control potentially makes it easier for the Trump administration to work with Congress to repeal Section 907. While passing any legislation is a difficult task on gridlocked Capitol Hill, Azerbaijan could offer something in exchange that both parties and the White House would value highly: the release of prisoners that officials, senators, and experts all consider unjustly detained. This group should include anti-corruption advocate Gubad Ibadoghlu, Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty and Voice of America journalists, and some Armenian detainees. The impact of freeing unjustly detained people would be far more valuable to the United States than maintaining a statute that is rendered moot almost every year. 

Such a trade would present fewer potential downsides to US interests than recent engagement with Belarus. US Special Envoy for Belarus John Coale has pursued a blunt sanctions-relief-for-prisoner-releases policy, a high-risk game that some worry could make it easier for Russia to evade US export controls and sanctions. Those fears haven’t yet been borne out, but with Belarusian dictator Alyaksandr Lukashenka still beholden to his Kremlin patron and aiding Moscow’s aggression, the United States risks undermining its own efforts to limit Russia’s ability to continue its war on Ukraine.

The stakes in Azerbaijan are thankfully much lower. The United States would not be dropping sanctions, merely giving itself the option to continue to provide security assistance to Baku. US military aid today is negligible: Since 2002, the United States has delivered approximately eighty million dollars’ worth of defense assistance to Azerbaijan in total. Vance did promise new aid on his February visit: an unspecified number of maritime patrol boats to better secure the country’s ports. These are tiny amounts of nonlethal security assistance made possible because the United States waives Section 907 every year. 

That figure could increase if Section 907 were repealed and Washington and Baku began arranging multiyear security assistance packages. Even so, that aid would likely still focus on nonlethal border security. Azerbaijan already acquires offensive capabilities from Turkey and Israel, at lower prices than US firms and stocks can offer. With Iran and Russia’s restive southern regions persistently unstable, Azerbaijan needs early-warning and border security capabilities more than it needs lethal capabilities.

The only thing the United States stands to lose by repealing Section 907 is leverage. US President Donald Trump can use that leverage by building on his administration’s success in freeing political prisoners in Belarus to simultaneously promote peace in the South Caucasus. Aliyev may even be more open to dealing than Lukashenka has been. Compared to Belarus, whose pro-democracy movement currently functions in exile but remains a powerful diplomatic force, the Azerbaijani government faces a much more muted opposition and could release detainees without fearing any real threat to its authority.

How to sequence the agreement

The full “grand deal” should therefore be structured as follows. In the run-up to the Armenian parliamentary election in June, Azerbaijan should free some of the Armenians it captured in 2023 in Karabakh as a gesture of good faith toward a deal. Washington and Baku then would work to agree to repeal Section 907 in exchange for the release of Azerbaijani detainees and additional Armenian prisoners. This would require the White House to work with Congress to secure the repeal ahead of the planned release, but with renewed faith in Azerbaijan’s seriousness about the deal. 

This proposed deal has something for everyone. Baku gets a two-for-one: It retains a true partner for peace negotiations in Pashinyan and resolves its main issue in front of the United States. Team Trump gets to free unjust detainees and bolster the president’s peacemaking image at essentially no cost. Congressional Republicans get the president a foreign policy win, while Democrats can tout their role in notching a rare human rights victory; both mollify the ever-active Armenian diaspora by securing the release of Karabakh Armenians. Yerevan gets citizens back and a steadier track toward normalization with its neighbors. This arrangement must include a clear warning to Baku that the benefits it receives are contingent on maintaining the hard-won peace.

Azerbaijan and Armenia have made major progress in the last several months to normalize relations, most recently boosting energy trade ties and agreeing to joint border demarcation. With some more nudging from the United States, Baku and Yerevan can take another step toward a final peace deal by freeing detainees. Crucially, all parties get to come out with a foreign policy win at almost no cost.

This plan would test the White House’s dealmaking diplomacy and Congress’s legislative creativity. But with so many potential benefits on offer in a short window of time, it’s worth exploring.

************************************************************************************************************

If you wish
to read daily updated Armenian news and commentary,

Please send
me your email address: [email protected]

Website:
TheCaliforniaCourier.com

************************************************************************************************************

Washington summit opened new chapter in Azerbaijan – U.S. partnership


A new patriarch was elected in Georgia

May 112026

Metropolitan Shio (Mujiri) of Senak and Chkhorotsghu, who is currently the deputy of the patriarchal chair, was elected the new patriarch of Georgia. This was announced by Metropolitan Anania after the vote held in the expanded assembly of the Georgian Orthodox Church.

“Vicar Shio received 22 votes, Metropolitan Iov – 9, and Metropolitan Grigol – 7 votes. One ballot was declared invalid. Metropolitan Shio has been elected as the Patriarch of Georgia,” said Metropolitan Anania.