Following their brief talks in Yerevan, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Armenian Foreign Minister Ararat Mirzoyan have signed a bilateral framework agreement on practical modalities of opening a U.S.-administered transit corridor for Azerbaijan through Armenia.
The Armenian Foreign Ministry released on Thursday a short video of Mirzoyan putting his signature under the deal.
“Secretary of State Rubio signed the agreement [on Monday,] the document was sent to Armenia, and now I have signed it on behalf of the Armenian side,” said Mirzoyan. “With this, the remote signing process is complete, and the agreement is ready for ratification.”
Mirozyan and Rubio initialed the deal when they met at Yerevan’s Zvartnots international airport on May 26. The top U.S. diplomat described it on Tuesday as an “opportunity to revolutionize Armenia’s strategic location.”
“It solves the issue of access that Azerbaijan cared about and which was an irritant in the relationship, but it does much more than that,” he told the U.S. Senate’s Foreign Relations Committee. “It has the ability to transform the Armenian economy in a very powerful way.”
The agreement reaffirms the key terms of a joint “implementation framework” for the planned Trump Route for International Peace and Prosperity (TRIPP) signed by the two men in January. Those include the creation of a joint U.S.-Armenian venture that will manage for at least 49 years a railway, a road, energy supply lines and other infrastructure to be built along the Armenian-Iranian border to connect Azerbaijan to its Nakhichevan exclave.
The U.S. government will own 74 percent of the TRIPP Development Company (TDC). The Armenian side is to grant the company “exclusive land use rights, development rights, related permissions, and all other rights” necessary for the transit arrangement.
The U.S. International Development Finance Corporation (DFC) formally approved support for the company’s creation on Wednesday. In a statement on the decision, it did not specify the amount of planned U.S. investments in the TRIPP infrastructures.
Rubio and Mirzoyan signed the deal just days before Armenia’s parliamentary elections. The three main opposition groups challenging the ruling Civil Contract say that the TRIPP could endanger Armenia’s vital border with Iran. Some of their leaders have also said that it amounts to the kind of an extraterritorial corridor that has been sought by Azerbaijan and Turkey.
Amid its continuing conflict with the United States and Israel, Iran likewise reaffirmed last week its opposition to the transit arrangement which it fears could lead to U.S. security presence along its border with Armenia.
“Tehran harbors severe suspicion toward the malicious intentions of the United States … and we have explicitly declared our opposition to such a destabilizing presence,” Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmail Baghaei told the ISNA news agency.
—
Օսիպյանի գործը և ատելության խոսքը. ՄԻՊ-ը մատնանշում է արդարադատության խնդիրնե
Մարդու իրավունքների պաշտպան Անահիտ Մանասյանն անդրադարձել է հնչեղություն ստացած գործերին, այդ թվում՝ Արցախից տեղահանված Արթուր Օսիպյանի կալանավորմանը՝ մտահոգություն հայտնելով երկրում ատելության խոսքի տարածման ու ընտրովի արդարադատության խնդիրների վերաբերյալ։
The issue of protecting the rights of people who declared a hunger strike is under the direct control of the HRD staff. Anahit Manasyan փոխանցմամբ՝ Artur Osipyan immediately after the incident, his representatives visited “Nubarashen” prison, but the latter initially refused to have a private interview. Within the framework of the national prevention mechanism, the Human Rights Council continues to monitor the condition of all persons on hunger strike.
Manasyan emphasized that the hunger strike is considered as a person’s right, and it is possible to interfere with it only in exceptional cases, but the state is obliged to provide proper medical supervision. At the same time, it was clarified that meeting the political demands of the hunger strikers is beyond the scope of the powers of the HRD.
During the briefing, special attention was paid to the problem of aggressive rhetoric in the public sphere. The human rights defender noted that the use of insults and hate speech by the supporters of various political forces is widespread.
Manasyan warned against the inadmissibility of applying double standards to the law enforcement system, noting that similar behavior should lead to similar legal consequences, regardless of a person’s political views. He stressed that only the most dangerous types of speech should be brought to criminal responsibility.
Referring to the latest cases of violence against opposition supporters, the Ombudsman noted that proceedings have already been initiated based on these facts, the progress of which is being monitored. Manasyan reaffirmed his principled position that it is unacceptable to deprive someone of their freedom without reason.
Concluding the speech, he admitted that the impression of selective justice has been formed among the public, pointing to the investigation of the June 12 cases as a vivid example of a systemic problem, the efficiency and delays of which have already been severely criticized by the HRD.
—
New Novel Tells Inter-Generational Story of Resilience and Hope Despite Rooted
A new novel “First Rule of Fire” by Rebecca Gopoian was released in May by Nauset Press.
The book, an interwoven and multi-generational narrative, shows how history can never truly be erased, no matter how hard we try to deny or forget.
Partly based on real diaries, the book explores how one family builds hope and resilience from the roots of trauma.
The story begins with Jivan in Eastern Turkey, 1914, at the start of the Armenian Genocide, and follows the young teen through years of upheaval as the life he knows falls apart.
The second thread depicts a day in the life of Araxie, Jivan’s future wife, a new mother grateful to have made it to America, eager to love and be loved, but haunted by her past.
Lastly, there is Miriam, the half-Armenian, half-Jewish future grandchild of Jivan and Araxie, stumbling into puberty and attempting to navigate middle school in 1980s New Jersey, while her family’s unspoken history lingers.
At times dark and painful, the novel also portrays the hopeful and awkward moments of life, whether in the midst of war or the relative safety of American suburbia – having a crush, being fourteen, searching for your place, and finding your way.
Author of “When Our Fathers Return to Us as Birds” Peter Markus praises the novel, “The prose in this novel dazzles and sings with a lyrical clarity all its own. The story itself and its inter-weaving between how the past lives on into the future is as compelling as you’re likely to find. On all levels—the writing, the characters, the sequence of interrelated events—this is a book hard to put down, a book that had to be written.”
Aida Zilelian, author of “All the Ways We Lied” writes, “Sweeping across timelines, ‘First Rule of Fire’ sends us on a voyage of memory, loss and innocence. The short chapters seem to burst from one moment to the next with tenderness, pain and warmth. ‘First Rule of Fire’ tells us that no matter our past, the love of family can mend what has been lost.”
Ben Nadler, author of “Prairie Ashes” also praises the novel, “Gopoian masterfully balances past and present as she explores intergenerational trauma—and healing—in an Armenian diaspora family. ‘First Rule of Fire’ is a bold assertion of life in the face of a violent history.”
Rebecca Gopoian received her MFA in Writing from the School of the Art Institute of Chicago. She is the author of a poetry chapbook, Terrible Person, and a book-length poem, Two, about becoming a mother for the second time. Rebecca lives in Queens and teaches English at Hostos Community College in the Bronx. First Rule of Fire is her first novel.
—
AUA Celebrates the Legacy of Late President Dr. Haroutune K. Armenian
YEREVAN — With heartfelt memories, personal stories, and a deep sense of gratitude, the American University of Armenia community gathered on June 3 to celebrate the life and enduring legacy of late AUA President Dr. Haroutune K. Armenian. A luminary leader, renowned public health expert, and beloved educator, Dr. Armenian dedicated more than a decade of service to the University, helping shape AUA into the institution it is today.
Dr. Armenian’s roles and impact included program development at the Ministry of Health in Bahrain, dean of the Faculty of Health Sciences at the American University of Beirut, director of the Master of Public Health program at Johns Hopkins University, and dean of the School of Public Health (now Turpanjian College of Health Sciences) at AUA.
He received numerous prestigious awards, including the Ernest Lyman Stebbins Medal for Excellence in Education, the Golden Apple Award for Excellence in Teaching from the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, and the AUA Presidential Commendation Award which recognizes individuals who have made extraordinary contributions to advancing education, research, and outreach with a significant impact on Armenia.
The event was attended by Chair of the AUA Board of Trustees Zaven P. Akian, AUA co-founder and President Emeritus Dr. Armen Der Kiureghian, the AUA Executive Team, AUA Board members, Turpanjian Rural Development Program beneficiaries, distinguished guests, Dr. Armenian’s family, friends, colleagues, and community members who gathered to pay tribute to his extraordinary life and legacy.
The event commenced with a documentary film, titled “Architect of Change,” showcasing Dr. Armenian’s advocacy, legacy, and significant impact not only on AUA, but also across Armenia. Dr. Armenian was a remarkable person and an innovator who contributed to pioneering academic programs, advancing AUA’s research, and leading the University toward accreditation by the Western Association of Schools and Colleges (now WASC Senior College and University Commission).
Through his initiative, AUA built modern facilities, welcomed its first cohort of international students, and established programs such as the Digital library of Classical Armenian Literature, and TRDP.
Following the film screening, AUA President Dr. Bruce Boghosian made opening remarks, recognizing Dr. Armenian’s influence and long-lasting mark he left on AUA and beyond. “A visionary educator, physician, and public health expert, Dr. Armenian was a strong proponent of education, community development, and meaningful social change,” he said. “Today, we celebrate Dr. Armenian’s enduring contributions, his achievements, and the profound impact that he has had in Armenia. His legacy will forever be remembered within these walls and beyond,” he added.
Following the President’s remarks, Dr. Varduhi Petrosyan, dean of the Gerald and Patricia Turpanjian College of Health Sciences, shared an emotional and heartfelt presentation of Dr. Armenian’s life, passions, and devotion to education. “He was a dedicated painter, and he noticed beauty and colors where many of us didn’t see or notice. He transferred them to paper and shared them with us to enjoy the same beauty,” she said. “Dr. Armenian’s entire life was about cultivating a culture of learning. He strongly believed in continuous quality improvement and found important parallels in quality in healthcare and education.”
Hratchia Lylozian (MPH ’16), TCHS research associate, spoke about Dr. Armenian’s character as an educator, and how devoted he was to his family, students, country, and profession. In addition, Artur Lalayan, TRDP program representative, recalled Dr. Armenian’s beliefs on rural development, emphasizing that Dr. Armenian saw it as an investment in human potential.
Chair of the AUA Board of Trustees Zaven P. Akian shared his memories of Dr. Armenian while they were studying and how he has left an everlasting mark on the University. “His legacy is woven into the story of AUA forever, and his example will continue to guide this institution for generations to come,” he said.
Dr. Armenian’s son Dr. Saro Armenian reflected on his father’s legacy. “He was our compass and a source of profound wisdom and strength. He believed deeply that Armenians everywhere had a responsibility not only to preserve identity and memory, but to build institutions, create opportunity, and contribute meaningfully to society,” he remarked.
The event also featured a touching performance by The Gurdjieff Ensemble, internationally known as a leading ensemble in Armenian traditional and sacred music. The ensemble is led by artistic director Levon Eskenian, who was a recipient of an AUA Turpanjian Family Foundation Scholarship during his studies in Armenia, an opportunity made possible through Dr. Armenian’s support.
The evening concluded with a reception at the Faculty Lounge, where some of Dr. Armenian’s paintings are on display.
Dr. Armenian’s work and unwavering commitment to AUA, and the people he mentored and supported will continue to live on and make a difference.
Founded in 1991, the American University of Armenia is a private, independent university located in Yerevan, Armenia, affiliated with the University of California, and accredited by the WASC Senior College and University Commission in the United States. AUA provides local and international students with Western-style education through top-quality undergraduate and graduate degree and certificate programs, promotes research and innovation, encourages civic engagement and community service, and fosters democratic values.
—
Pashinyan is trying to hide the decline of internal legitimacy with external legitimacy
June: 4, 2026
About a week ago, US President Trump expressed his support for Nikol Pashinyan in a note, considering him a leader who “brings peace to Armenia”.
In February, when US Vice President Vance visited Armenia, he also openly expressed his support for Nikol Pashinyan, taking into account the upcoming parliamentary elections on June 7.
Political scientist Vazgen Hovhannisyan In short, it is difficult to say whether such encouraging words can secure votes for Nikol Pashinyan in the elections or not, because there is no indicator.
“Trump’s and Macron’s open support for Pashinyan, as well as the US Secretary of State’s visit to Armenia, if we analyze it politely, then all this is called a veil of external legitimacy. This is an accepted formula, especially in countries where there is a decline in internal legitimacy.
I think that after the elections, even if Nikol Pashinyan is re-elected, his internal legitimacy will fall, at the expense of which he is now trying to provide a veil of external legitimacy.” of 168.am said Vazgen Hovhannisyan in a conversation with
According to him, at the moment, for Nikol Pashinyan, it is not Armenian-American or Armenian-Russian relations that are important, but which external actors support him more to ensure the external component of legitimacy.
“I don’t think that Marco Rubio, who visited Armenia on May 26 and spoke at the US Congress, did not even say Nikol Pashinyan’s position correctly, he considered him the president of Armenia. In other words, the US Secretary of State does not even know that Armenia is a parliamentary government country. The high-ranking US official came to Armenia for 40 minutes on May 26, he did not even leave the airport, he came only to sign 3 memorandums,” the political scientist added.
According to him, these signed memoranda cannot be of strategic importance, they do not provide a certain legal basis for the cooperation of the states. A certain legal contract base is provided by clear contracts obtained as a result of long negotiations, which provide a chain of actions point by point.
“Furthermore, the addressee of all this was not Armenia, but Russia, we clearly see that the United States and Western countries support Nikol Pashinyan. This is logical, this is the formula for the struggle of various external power centers,” said Vazgen Hovhannisyan.
—
Georgia’s Wine Lesson for Armenia: How the Russian Embargo Creates New Opport
On the eve of the parliamentary elections in Armenia, Moscow declared a food war on Yerevan. The Russian Federation is imposing an embargo on Armenian products—ranging from flowers and mineral water to vegetables, fruits, fish, wine, and brandy. Georgia followed a similar path in 2006: Russian restrictions dealt a painful blow to exports, but simultaneously pushed producers to diversify. Now, following Tbilisi’s example, Yerevan also intends to seek new markets.
In the run-up to the elections in Armenia, Russian agencies began gradually restricting product shipments from the republic. Within a few weeks, several categories of Armenian exports fell under restrictions at once: flowers, Jermuk mineral water, certain types of wine and brandy, fresh tomatoes, cucumbers, peppers, herbs, strawberries, as well as fish and fish products. Later, the list expanded to include seasonal fruits—sour cherries, sweet cherries, apricots, plums, peaches, nectarines, and grapes.
Formally, the Russian side explains these decisions by citing sanitary, veterinary, and phytosanitary concerns. Rosselkhoznadzor (the Federal Service for Veterinary and Phytosanitary Supervision) claimed violations in the supply of fruit and vegetable products and the need to “ensure phytosanitary safety.” In the case of flowers, the agency cited the need to inspect greenhouse facilities. Rospotrebnadzor (the Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing), for its part, suspended the sale of Jermuk mineral water, citing non-compliance with safety and labeling requirements, and banned the sale of wines and brandies from three Armenian producers following quality checks.
Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan characterized the ban as politically motivated. He promised to support companies affected by the Russian restrictions.
“The government has already decided that in all cases where unfair obstacles to exports arise, we will implement support programs, we will implement subsidy programs for these goods, so that there are no victims in our economy,” Pashinyan said, clarifying that this refers to cases where the obstacles are not related to product quality.
The Prime Minister later added that in addition to compensating affected companies, the government is also ready to find new markets. Armenia’s Minister of Economy, Gevorg Papoyan, also announced plans to redirect a portion of exports. According to him, products banned in the Russian Federation will be sold in European Union countries. The Ministry of Economy has already presented a company support program to the cabinet.
In an interview with CivilNet, Papoyan stated that Yerevan cannot “exchange sovereignty for tomatoes.” According to him, economic risks are important, but they have a limit when state interests are at stake.
“Today, I want to say that the products of the Republic of Armenia have resolved the quality issue. Our products are 100% compliant with European market standards,” Papoyan added.
Georgia’s Experience
In the past, Russia has repeatedly used food embargoes and sanitary bans as a tool of political pressure against post-Soviet countries that chose a path of rapprochement with the West.
Georgia and Moldova became classic examples of this policy. In 2006, amid worsening relations with Tbilisi and Chisinau, Rospotrebnadzor completely banned imports of Georgian and Moldovan wines, as well as Georgian Borjomi mineral water, officially citing “quality issues.” For Moldova, the blow was repeated in 2013–2014, when the country was signing an Association Agreement with the EU—not only wines, but also fruits, meat, and vegetables fell under the ban.
However, the geography of Moscow’s “trade wars” was much broader. In 2013, on the eve of the expected signing of the association agreement between Ukraine and the EU, Russia blocked imports of products from the Roshen confectionery company, and later introduced large-scale restrictions on Ukrainian agricultural products.
Over the years, sprats and dairy products from Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania have also fallen under bans. Even the Kremlin’s closest allies faced economic pressure: due to oil, gas, and customs disputes, Russia regularly waged “milk” and “meat” wars, banning supplies from Belarusian enterprises.
These measures forced the affected states to diversify their markets and redirect exports to the European Union and Asia. This is precisely what happened with Georgian products. When the Russian Federation banned imports of Georgian wine, mineral water, and some agricultural products in 2006, it dealt a sensitive blow to the Georgian economy. Just as in the current case with Armenia, Moscow cited complaints about quality and sanitary standards back then as well.
Before the embargo, Russia remained the main market for Georgian wine: by various estimates, it accounted for the lion’s share of wine exports. In March 2006, the publication Civil Georgia wrote that up to 90% of all Georgian wine exports went to Russia, while the IWPR organization cited data showing that in the previous year, Georgia had exported over 36 million liters of wine to Russia, worth about $63 million.
However, the loss of the Russian market forced Georgian producers to seek new directions, change production standards, and work with more demanding markets. After the embargo, dependence on the Russian consumer was replaced by markets in Ukraine, EU countries, the US, and even China.
A 2013 article in the Journal of Wine Economics noted that after Moscow introduced the restrictions, Georgian wine exports initially declined in volume but “notably improved in quality.”
According to Galt&Taggart, from 2005 to 2012, exports of Georgian wine to the EU more than tripled, reaching about 2.6 million liters worth $9 million; the highest growth rates among EU countries were in Poland and Bulgaria. By 2014, the list of countries to which Tbilisi exported its wines had grown to 120.
Return to Exports to Russia
At the same time, the Georgian example highlights another side to this story: a dependency on the Russian market, once reduced, can be restored. After the embargo was lifted in 2013, Georgian wine quickly began to regain its position in Russia. For producers, this was a large and familiar market where the Georgian product was already recognized, and promotion costs were lower than in the EU or the US.
As a result, the Russian direction once again became the primary one for the industry. According to Transparency International Georgia, in 2021, the Russian Federation imported 55% of the wine exported from Georgia, valued at $131 million. In 2022, the Russian market share rose to 63.8%, and in 2023, it reached 65%—the highest level since 2005.
An article in the International Journal of Wine Business Research on the challenges of Georgian winemaking noted that the National Wine Agency had failed to sustain diversification after the embargo: after returning to the Russian market, exports there surged once again. This trend effectively returned the industry to its old vulnerability: the Russian market became not just a commercial destination, but a potential political lever once more.
Moreover, the issue was not only the volume of sales, but also the quality of the export model itself. A 2021 Galt&Taggart report noted that the average export price of Georgian wine in new target markets—such as the US, the UK, China, Japan, Germany, and others—was 26% higher than in the Russian Federation and other CIS countries. In other words, returning to the Russian market provided quick volume but kept the industry in a lower price segment compared to markets where Georgian wine could sell at higher prices and compete through quality and positioning.
—
«Պետք է մեկ «խրամատային կռիվ» տանք, ու տա Աստված՝ այս ամենն ավարտվի ընտրատեղա
June: 4, 2026
The political forces participating in the parliamentary elections expected in Armenia on June 7 are already summarizing their pre-election campaign by holding large rallies.
On the one hand, the government and the forces close to it call on the citizens to participate in the elections, on the other hand, they announce and threaten that, for example, “those coming from Russia for the opposition, who will participate in the elections, should be sent to 25-day training camps.”
The Minister of Economy Gevorg Papoyan first expressed such an idea the other day, and then Nikol Pashinyan’s Deputy Chief of Staff repeated it, saying: “Persons who came from Russia with election bribes will be involved in 25-day training camps.”
Singer, songwriter, freedom fighter Davit Amalyan according to him, taking into account all the actions and steps of the government, the elections expected on June 7 will be fatal.
“In these elections, the polling stations become “trenches”, we must fight one “trench battle”, and God willing, this will all end with a polling station “war”, in order to get rid of the challenges of the real enemy, because they are no longer hiding their goals.” 168.amDavit Amalyan said in a conversation with
According to him, in contrast to 2021, he sees some progress in the awakening of the people in these elections.
“The mass that does not care whether they are Turks or not, that mass has decreased. In all my interviews, I tell all indifferent people: don’t do a worse job than the opponent is doing, indifference is a more negative phenomenon in this situation. I ask everyone to go to the polling stations, if they don’t vote for someone, let them do something on that paper, if only they go,” our interlocutor added.
As for the threat of 25-day exercises by the representatives of the government, Davit Amalyan said that he does not think that such a large number of people from abroad will come to Armenia to participate in the elections.
“This statement is a great provocation, the smell of defeat has hit their noses, for that they are capable of anything. Serious people do not take this provocation seriously: standing in a trench is an honor for any man. What they did is simply immoral, because sending them to the border is not a punishment, they are the ones who do not understand anything about the boyish step of guarding the border. They do not understand that a normal Armenian came from Moscow or India to fight against the Turks, for that Armenian it is one thing: will he stand at the post for a month, for a year, or will he give his life for a friend?
Let’s hope everything will be fine,” emphasized Davit Amalyan.
—
Ֆիթնեսի նոր չափորոշիչներ և քեշբեք. ՀՀ-ն բարեփոխում է ոլորտը
Հայաստանի կառավարությունը նախաձեռնում է սպորտային և առողջարարական ոլորտի արմատական բարեփոխումներ, որոնց շրջանակներում ֆիթնես կենտրոնների համար կսահմանվեն անվտանգության խիստ կանոններ, իսկ մարզվող քաղաքացիները կստանան շոշափելի ֆինանսական արտոնություններ:
ՀՀ ԿԳՄՍ նախարար Ժաննա Անդրեասյանի ներկայացրած նախագծի համաձայն՝ նոր նորմատիվներն ուժի մեջ կմտնեն կառավարության որոշման հաստատումից մեկ տարի անց։ Այս անցումային ժամանակահատվածը տրամադրվում է գործող կազմակերպություններին՝ սեփական գործունեությունը վերլուծելու և պետական պահանջներին համապատասխանեցնելու նպատակով։
Ավելի քան քառասուն պրոֆիլային ընկերությունների ներկայացուցիչների հետ խորհրդակցությունների արդյունքում մշակված կանոնակարգը խստիվ արգելում է ինքնաշեն մարզասարքերի կիրառումը և պահանջում ամբողջ գույքի պարտադիր սերտիֆիկացում՝ անվտանգությունն ապահովելու համար։ Բացի այդ, հստակ չափանիշներ են սահմանվում օդափոխության, բնական և արհեստական լուսավորության, ջրամատակարարման, սանհանգույցների ու բժշկական ծառայությունների հասանելիության նկատմամբ, իսկ մարզիչները պարտավոր կլինեն ունենալ մասնագիտական որակավորումը հավաստող փաստաթղթեր։
Միևնույն ժամանակ, իշխանությունները մշակում են բնակչության ֆիզիկական ակտիվությունը պարտադիր բժշկական ապահովագրության համակարգի միջոցով խրախուսելու նորարարական մեխանիզմներ։
Փոխվարչապետ Մհեր Գրիգորյանի խոսքով՝ ոլորտի հաջող ստանդարտացման և որակի նկատմամբ վստահության ձևավորման դեպքում պետությունը կգործարկի քեշբեքի ծրագիր։ Քաղաքացիների՝ սպորտդահլիճների վրա արված ծախսերը կհամարվեն առողջապահության ապահովագրության վճար և ավտոմատ կերպով կնվազեցվեն ընդհանուր մուծումներից։
Այս նախաձեռնության իրագործման համար կպահանջվի թվային ենթակառուցվածքների զարգացում, մասնավորապես՝ մարզումների էլեկտրոնային արձանագրում և տվյալների ինտեգրում «Արմեդ» միասնական համակարգին։ Կառավարությունում ընդգծում են, որ ռազմավարական տեսանկյունից շատ ավելի ցանկալի է պետական մակարդակով ֆինանսավորել սպորտն ու հիվանդությունների կանխարգելումը, քան ուղղակիորեն վճարել բժշկական ապահովագրության և բուժման համար։
—
Արարատի մարզի Նորաշեն բնակավայրում գործարկվելու է էլեկտրական շչակ
On June 5, from 11:00 to 12:00, a practical training will be held in the kindergarten of Norashen settlement, Artashat community, Ararat marz.
Միջոցառումը կրում է «Ազդարարում, տարհանում, պատսպարում» թեման։
Պարապմունքի ընթացքում գործարկվելու է էլեկտրական շչակ: Խնդրում ենք չանհանգստանալ և չմատնվել խուճապի։
—
ՆԳ նախարարը պարգևատրել է համակարգի լավագույն ծառայողներին
ՆԳ նախարար Արփինե Սարգսյանը Հանրապետության տոնի առթիվ պետական բարձր պարգևներ է հանձնել Ոստիկանության և Փրկարար ծառայության մի շարք ծառայողների։
Հիշեցնենք, որ ՀՀ վարչապետի միջնորդությամբ և Հանրապետության նախագահի հրամանագրով՝ ծառայության ընթացքում ցուցաբերած նվիրումի, օրինականության և հասարակական կարգի պահպանության գործում ներդրած ավանդի համար ՆԳ նախարարության մի շարք ծառայողներ պարգևատրվել են «Հայրենիքին մատուցած ծառայությունների համար» 2-րդ աստիճանի, «Հասարակական կարգի գերազանց պահպանման համար» և «Երախտագիտության» մեդալներով։
Արփինե Սարգսյանը պետական բարձր պարգևների արժանանալու կապակցությամբ շնորհավորել է ծառայողներին՝ ընդգծելով, որ դրանք ոչ միայն անհատական, այլև թիմի աշխատանքի գնահատանքի դրսևորում են՝ ուղղված Ոստիկանության և Փրկարար ծառայության ամբողջ անձնակազմի աշխատանքին։
Նախարար Սարգսյանն ընդգծել է, որ պետական պարգևները նույն նվիրումով ու պատասխանատվությամբ ծառայությունը շարունակելու, մասնագիտական առաջընթացի ու նոր ձեռքբերումների խթան են։
—