Beware of Tarkanian

*By Gregg Doyel < l>*
*CBS SportsLine.com Senior Writer
**June 3, 12:47 p.m.*

Beware of Tarkanian

As we speak, the book college basketball doesn’t want you to read is
being written: Jerry Tarkanian’s tell-all.

And according to author Dan Wetzel, Tarkanian does tell all. After years
of fighting the NCAA and being accused of every recruiting violation
under the sun, Tarkanian has lots to say. Lots to admit, too.

“He’s got stories you wouldn’t believe,” Wetzel says. “He’s out of
coaching. So what does he care?”

No release date has been set, but don’t worry. When the book comes out,
you’ll know it. How? Because people all over the college basketball
landscape will be ducking for cover.

Here’s one excerpt about a high school star who infatuated Tarkanian.
The player’s name and the identity of the opposing school are in the
book, but for now they’ve been left blank by me, because suspense is
better. Use your imagination:

“At one point (the player) wanted me to take his entire high school
team, give them all scholarships just to get him,” Tarkanian says. “As a
compromise I took one player from his high school, (name here), who was
a good student and a good player. I even got (the star’s) girlfriend
into Long Beach State, just one more reason he didn’t ever have to leave
campus.”

Tark learned, though, that his star recruit had been cheating on him
with another college.

“The story was (the player) got a new Corvette. That’s it. (The other
school) gave (him) a new Corvette and was taking all of his high school
buddies. They signed the whole team. … (That team’s coach) cashed in
his teacher’s retirement to get (the player) the Corvette.”

Wow.

http://cbs.sportsline.com/columns/writers/doye

Grand Conseil vaudois: le genocide armenien formellement reconnu

SwissInfo, Suisse
5 Juillet 2005

Grand Conseil vaudois: le génocide arménien formellement reconnu

LAUSANNE – Le Grand Conseil vaudois a formellement reconnu le
génocide arménien. Il l’avait déjà fait indirectement en 2003. La
résolution adoptée n’engage toutefois que le législatif, le Conseil
d’Etat estimant cette démarche inappropriée.

“Les divergences portent sur la forme plus que sur le fond”, a assuré
le conseiller d’Etat Jean-Claude Mermoud devant le plénum. Le
gouvernement vaudois “préfère faciliter la tche de la conseillère
fédérale Micheline Calmy-Rey”.

En outre, cette démarche n’a plus vraiment de sens, puisque le
Conseil National a reconnu le génocide arménien en décembre 2003,
estimait le Conseil d’Etat. Le gouvernement vaudois proposait au
législatif cantonal d’en rester là.

M. Mermoud a rappelé que la prise en considération de ce postulat en
2003 avait provoqué le report du voyage en Turquie de la cheffe de la
diplomatie. “Les sensibilités sont encore à vif”, a-t-il souligné.

Les parlementaires ont refusé de s’aligner sur la position de
l’exécutif. La résolution a été acceptée par 86 voix contre 35 et 25
abstentions. Elle indique simplement que “le Grand Conseil du Canton
de Vaud reconnaît le génocide du peuple arménien de 1915 et honore la
mémoire des victimes”.

Le “Quid” condamne pour sa presentation du genocide armenien

Libération, France
mercredi 06 juillet 2005

Le “Quid” condamné pour sa présentation du génocide arménien

PARIS – Le tribunal de Paris a condamné les éditions Robert Laffont
pour une présentation jugée erronée dans le “Quid”, entre 2002 et
2004, du génocide des Arméniens de Turquie en 1915.

L’éditeur devra verser un euro symbolique de dommages et intérêts à
quatre associations arméniennes et devra en outre publier dans trois
quotidiens, trois hebdomadaires et sur son site internet un
communiqué déclarant que la présentation de l’événement historique a
été jugée “fautive”.

La modification de l’édition 2005, déjà réformée, de même que
l’insertion d’un texte demandé par le Comité de défense de la cause
arménienne (CDCA) et le Comité de défense des organisations
arméniennes en France, ont en revanche été refusées.

Le tribunal estime que le “Quid” a eu le tort, dans les articles
“Turquie” et “Arménie”, de présenter comme des informations
éventuelles des bilans sous-évalués du génocide établis par des
historiens négationnistes.

Il reproche aussi à l’ouvrage de juxtaposer les positions turque et
arménienne sur l’événement en privilégiant la première et de recourir
à des termes négationnistes tels que “voyage” au lieu de
“déportation”.

Enfin, le “Quid” est sanctionné pour avoir donné du crédit à la thèse
selon laquelle les Arméniens auraient été massacrés en raison de leur
collaboration avec la Russie pendant la Première Guerre mondiale.

“Cette faute cause incontestablement aux proches et aux héritiers de
cette communauté (arménienne) un trouble et une douleur morale
d’autant plus vifs que le souvenir et l’attention historique venaient
de triompher de décennies de silence”, dit le tribunal dans ses
attendus.

Le génocide des Arméniens par les Turcs, reconnu par l’Onu, le
Parlement européen, le Conseil de l’Europe et le Parlement français,
a fait jusqu’à un million et demi de morts en 1915.

La Turquie nie l’existence d’un génocide mais admet qu’il y a eu des
massacres. Elle conteste également le nombre de victimes.

“C’est une grande victoire pour la mémoire de nos grands-parents.
Avec ce jugement, la France vient d’envoyer un message clair à la
Turquie pour qu’elle cesse sa propagande négationniste, dont le Quid
se faisait le relais”, a estimé après le jugement Harout
Mardirossian, président du Comité de défense de la cause arménienne.

CT: Checkmating Putin is chess king’s gambit

Checkmating Putin is chess king’s gambit

By Alex Rodriguez
Chicago Tribune foreign correspondent
Published July 5, 2005

KOSTROMA, Russia — Garry Kasparov had nothing left to conquer. For
two decades he reigned over international chess with the swagger of a
Cossack and a memory that took on supercomputers. His peers vanquished
and his patience worn thin by the politics of his game, the fiery,
unpredictable chess legend yearned for a new arena.

This year he found one. Announcing his retirement from professional
chess in March, Kasparov threw himself headlong into Russian politics,
undaunted by its tripwires or its steely overseer, President Vladimir
Putin.

In fact, Kasparov has made clear he sees Putin as his new archrival.
Kasparov is virtually alone in Russian politics in calling for the
dismantling of Putin’s regime, and in the use of large-scale street
rallies to try to get the job done.

Russian political analysts view Kasparov’s endeavor as quixotic and
ultimately doomed. Polls suggest most Russians are unaware of
Kasparov’s career move. Nearly two-thirds say they never would elect
him president.

Kasparov is not accustomed to being the underdog, but it doesn’t
appear to faze him either. State-controlled television has ignored him
since he announced his switch from chess to politics, so he has begun
seeding grass-roots backing in Russia’s provinces.

In mid-June he took his message of democracy and regime change to
Kostroma, a small provincial capital along the banks of the Volga
River. Last week he appeared in the volatile North Caucasus republic
of Dagestan, recently besieged by a wave of bombings and violence
spilling over from the 10-year separatist conflict in neighboring
Chechnya.

“I’m not so stupid as to evaluate our chances with great enthusiasm,”
Kasparov said at his downtown Moscow office. “But at same time, I can
feel that the monolith of [Kremlin] power is no longer that solid.
Every action, every move by Putin and his associates to strengthen
their grip on power . . . inevitably reduces their power base, because
it always hurts someone else’s interests.”

Kasparov’s colleagues and friends worry that it may be Kasparov who
gets hurt. The first rule Russian politicians learn is that in Russian
politics, there are no rules. Nine members of parliament have been
killed since 1994. Most observers believe former Russian oil magnate
Mikhail Khodorkovsky was sentenced recently to 9 years in prison
because he dared to fund campaigns of Kremlin opponents.

“We’re all terrified for him,” said Frederic Friedel, a close friend
of Kasparov’s and an editor at ChessBase.com. “I tried to give him
sound advice: I told him, `Be careful–for God’s sake, be careful!'”

Kasparov, 42, no longer is world champion–he lost that title in his
2000 match with countryman Vladimir Kramnik in London. Nevertheless,
he is widely regarded as the greatest chess player ever and has been
ranked No. 1 in the world by the World Chess Federation since 1984.

His style of play was legendary. He rarely settled for draws, instead
aggressively pursuing his opponents with daring attacks. Most players
strive to betray as little emotion as possible, but Kasparov grinned,
chuckled, huffed and winced through matches.

“A lot of players lost to him because they felt his intensity,”
Friedel said. “[Russian chess professional] Vladislav Tkachev once
said to me, `Kasparov was shorter than me, but when I played him, he
towered over me.'”

Viktor Korchnoi, a longtime rival of Kasparov’s who defected from the
Soviet Union in 1976 and lives in Switzerland, defeated Kasparov only
once, losing 11 times.

“He has tremendous knowledge, more than any other modern grandmaster,”
Korchnoi said. “And he invests into any given chess game a huge amount
of energy, more than anyone else can.”

Born in Baku, Azerbaijan, Kasparov learned chess at the age of 5 by
watching his parents play. When he turned 17, he became a grandmaster.
Five years later, he shocked the world by defeating countryman Anatoly
Karpov to become the youngest world champion ever, after an epic match
that took 14 months to complete.

Kasparov went on to defeat Karpov on three other occasions. His career
low point came in 1997, when he lost to IBM’s Deep Blue supercomputer,
a defeat Kasparov blamed on human assistance he believed the computer
had received

For the latter part of his chess career, Kasparov largely confined his
politics to squabbles with the World Chess Federation, which refused
to recognize him as world champion because he had co-founded a rival
chess group. Through the 1990s he flitted in and out liberal politics
in Russia, never sustaining any commitment.

However, the collapse of Russia’s liberal movement during the December
2003 parliamentary elections renewed his interest. In the election
aftermath, a new liberal coalition called Committee 2008 named him
chairman. Soon afterward, when negotiations for another world
championship match faltered, Kasparov sensed it was time to quit.

Calling it quits

He announced his decision to retire from professional chess in March
after a match in Linares, Spain. In Russia, where chess is played
everywhere from park benches to grade schools and chess champions are
revered as national heroes, Kasparov’s departure cut deep. His fans
there were crushed.

“They have no one to root for now,” said Alexander Bach, executive
director of the Russian Chess Federation.

Though many in the chess world believe Kasparov’s departure robs the
game of its anchor, Kasparov insists it will survive without him.

“What happens in the chess world is the result of many players and
officials not just one person,” he said.

With his energy focused exclusively on Russian politics, Kasparov is
applying the same all-out, no-holds-barred philosophy he used on the
chessboard. He routinely labels Putin’s regime “a dictatorship.” In
January he called the president a “fascist,” and in a recent Wall
Street Journal commentary he likened Putin to the Roman emperor Caligula.

Kasparov is convinced Putin will either try to change Russia’s
constitution to allow for a third successive term or install a
surrogate whom he can direct from behind the scenes. He won’t rule out
running for the presidency in 2008, but he said his current focus is
Putin’s ouster from power.

Kasparov has discussed alliances with other Russian liberal democrats,
but those talks have stalled because, as Kasparov said, other liberal
politicians are unwilling to go as far in denouncing Putin as he is.

“The big roadblock with Kasparov is that he considers Putin’s regime
to not be legitimate,” said Boris Nadezhdin, a leading Russian liberal
and member of the Union of Right Forces party. “That gives us too
little room for negotiations. We still think that we should negotiate
with the regime.”

For now, Kasparov is content with grass-roots support for the kind of
street protests that led to bloodless revolutions in Georgia and
Ukraine. His whistle-stop tour across Russia has taken him from St.
Petersburg to the Siberian city of Novosibirsk, from Kostroma, 186
miles northeast of Moscow, to the Caspian Sea port of Makhachkala.

Kremlin on his trail

In Kostroma, Kasparov shuttled from event to event in a small bus,
meeting with a local Communist Party leader who heads the province’s
parliament, the city’s mayor and host of local politicians and
journalists. He called the visit a success, though there were signs
the Kremlin was keeping tabs.

During a round-table session with politicians and journalists, a local
newspaper covering Kasparov’s visit received a call from federal
authorities: Confine your coverage to a small blurb. The Kremlin also
had tried to persuade the Communist Party official to cancel his
meeting with Kasparov, Kasparov said.

“Obviously they have a variety of options, and some of them are
nasty,” Kasparov said. “But it doesn’t matter, because I believe I
have to do this. If I believe that Putin is anathema to my country,
then I cannot afford to calculate risk.”

———-
[email protected]

Hayrikyan’s three holidays

A1plus

| 17:36:52 | 05-07-2005 | Politics |

HAYRIKYAN’S THREE HOLIDAYS

`I am celebrating three holidays today – the US Independence Day (day is not
over in the US yet), my birthday and the Constitution Day’, leader of
National Self-Determination Union Paruyr Hayrikyan stated.

Paruyr Hayrikyan is grateful to the United States for ruining the Soviet
Union. As for the Constitution, he said the following: `A nation can have a
state without Constitution but there can’t be guaranteed democracy.’ However
he refrained from commenting on his birthday.

To note, P. Hayrikyan submitted a number of proposals referring to
dissolution of the parliament and dual citizenship, which, according to him,
were included in the draft amendments.

Paruyr Hayrikyan also noted that the NSDU leadership decided to restore the
representations abroad.

Constitution Day in the street

A1plus

| 16:48:25 | 05-07-2005 | Politics |

CONSTITUTION DAY IN THE STREET

With the slogans `White Genocide’, `Justice’ the residents of the North and
Main Avenues, who were expelled from their houses, gathered today at the
President’s residence and then marched to the building of the Constitutional
Court.

`The Constitution does not exist. Today, by decree of the government a white
genocide is perpetrated’, one of the protesters said. Raffi K. Hovannisian,
chairman of Heritage party and Ombudsman Larisa Alaverdyan were the only
officials to approach the people. They told they share the anxiety of the
demonstrators and agree with their claims.

While the demonstrators were demanding the importance of following the
Constitution, those, who celebrated the holiday were speaking of the
importance of implementation and strengthening of constitutional culture.

To note, a cake called `RA Constitution’ was baked specially for the
holiday, however none of the officials tasted a piece in the presence of
journalists.

Violation of Human Rights in numbers

A1plus

| 13:03:16 | 06-07-2005 | Social |

VIOLATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN NUMBERS

For the first 6 months of 2005 the RA Defender of Human Rights received more
than 1450 application-complaints, from which 849 – in written form. There
have been 535 complaints from regions, and 343 – in written form.

231 complaints have been accepted for discussion, 68 applicants have been
shown the possibilities of defending their rights, 48 complaints have been
passed on to the corresponding bodies, 218 are subject to filling in, and
284 were not accepted for discussion.

The statistics of the written complaints about the activity of the state
governing and local self-governing body is as follows:

Police – 110

Ministry of Labor and Social Security – 103

Courts – 95

Yerevan municipality – 73

Local self-governing bodies – 65

Prosecutor’s Office – 55

Ministry of Justice – 46

Minister of Defense = 44

Municipalities (excluding Yerevan) – 37

Regional governor’s office – 36

Realty Cadastre – 34

Administration of Migration and Refugees – 22

Social security state fund – 16

Water economy state Committee – 12

Ministry of Education and Science – 9

Ministry of Commerce and Economic development – 9

Ministry of Health – 8

Ministry of Transport and Communication – 7

Tax state service attached to the RA Government – 7

Ministry of Urban Development – 6

Government – 3

Ministry of energy – 3

Ministry of Finance and Economy – 2

Other – 47

Government’s decisions anti-constitutional?

A1plus

| 21:08:03 | 05-07-2005 | Politics |

GOVERNMENT’S DECISIONS ANTI-CONSTITUTIONAL?

Article 100.1 of the Constitution says that the Constitutional Court views
the government’s decisions from the aspect of their correspondence to the
Constitution.

When asked how many decisions were taken on such cases, CC chairman Gagik
Harutyunyan said, `None. There was no appeal, no case. Does it mean that all
the decisions by the government are constitutional? Proceeding from the
international practice I can say they are not.’

State officials including David Harutyunyan violate constitution

A1plus

| 19:48:38 | 05-07-2005 | Politics |

STATE OFFICIALS INCLUDING DAVID HARUTYUNYAN VIOLATE CONSTITUTION

It’s the 10-th anniversary of the adoption of the Constitution today and
people try to reveal the shortcomings of the organic law of the country. In
our republic, the Constitution does not operate in corpore.

RA Justice Minister David Harutyunyan shares the opinion. `I agree that the
Constitution does not function fully. Nevertheless the Constitution has
saved the country from many crises. Moreover, our success is thanks to the
Constitution for most part’, he said.

David Harutyunyan does not consider the government’s decision on the
construction of the North and Main Avenues to be an anti-constitutional
decision. `The denude of property is a common institute. The other question
is how the amount of compensation is calculated. Sure, there can be
discrepancies and the only way to settle them is to appeal to the court.

When asked whether he can recall a case when the Constitution was violated
by a state official David Harutyunyan said, `Certainly. There are plenty of
such cases. Very often officials do deeds they are not empowered to do.
Contrary to ordinary citizens the state officials are obliged to do the duty
imposed on them by the law.

-Have you ever violated the Constitution or your duties?

– I think I am not sinless.

-Does an official violate the law deliberately or unknowingly?

– I suppose both reasons are present.

-What about you?

– I perceive making a violation.

Cease-fire not violated

A1plus

| 17:51:27 | 05-07-2005 | Politics |

CEASE-FIRE NOT VIOLATED

Today the OSCE Mission held a recurrent monitoring was held at the contact
line of the Karabakh and Azeri armed forces to the southwest of Karmiravan
settlement of Mardakert region of NKR.

Miroslav Vimetal and Peter Key, tield assistants of the Personal
Representative of the OSCE Chairman-in-Office conducted the monitoring from
the Karabakh party. The Azeri side did not lead the monitoring group to the
contact line.

No violations of cease-fire were fixed.