Lawyer Robert Hayrapetyan wrote on his Facebook page. “Yesterday was the 26th anniversary of the formation of the Constitutional Court (CC), in which the new website of the CC was also presented.

While Arman Dilanyan was trying to convince himself and the rest of his legitimacy at the mentioned presentation, the circumstances of the implementation of reforms in the Constitutional Court, the setting of new standards fixed in the decisions, the reality resembled a much more pathetic picture.

Three judges of the Constitutional Court, Hrayr Tovmasyan, Arevik Petrosyan, Yervand Khundkaryan, were not present at the event, who, by the way, as we have noticed, do not always participate in such events. The former president of the CC Gagik Harutyunyan, the president of the Court of Cassation, even Yeghishe Kirakosyan and the owners of the remaining empty seats were not present either.  A total boycott was also announced by journalists.

In this context, the preceding events are also significant.

The latest HRH report on the failure to make decisions as a result of equal distribution of votes in the Constitutional Court, which translates to avoid making decisions on political issues through the equal distribution of votes as a result of the agreement of the judges (which happens exactly in such cases).

The results of the recently conducted IRI survey, according to which, the National Assembly, the occupied Constitutional Court and the “Jhangiryan” BKH received the lowest rating in the evaluation of the work of state bodies (by the way, it was very symbolic that Arman Dilanyan and the corrupt law enforcement officer and symbol of the judicial system, the BKH President Jhangiryan, sat next to each other as a symbol of the successful usurpation of the judicial power). This is despite the fact that in the case of a total information attack and misinformation, even during the reign of Hrayr Tovmasyan, among the law enforcement agencies, the Constitutional Court enjoyed the highest trust of the people, which was more reliable than the prosecutor’s office-prosecution system and other courts.

Well, it is unnecessary to talk about the quality of the decisions of the Supreme Court, the new standards reflected in them, because first of all, they “accidentally” always express the views of the ruling power in cases of political importance, and secondly, they at best resemble an insufficiently evaluated first-year term paper.

Well, it remains to be comforted by the fact that as a result of shaping the country’s entire agenda around Hrayr Tovmasyan for almost two years, investing so much potential in the “reform” of the Constitutional Court in a warring country, we finally have an unprecedented Constitutional Court website, well, at least that’s what they assured Arman Dilanyan.”