Azerbaijan Is Much Obliged To The USA

AZERBAIJAN IS MUCH OBLIGED TO THE USA
by Irada Alekperova, Alexei Slobodin
Translated by A. Ignatkin

Source: Vremya Novostei, April 28, 2006, p. 5
Agency WPS
DEFENSE and SECURITY (Russia)
May 3, 2006 Wednesday

…But It Isn’t Going To Participate In An Operation Against Iran

AN UPDATE ON PRESIDENT ILHAM ALIYEV’S VISIT TO WASHINGTON; Wrapping
up his first visit to the United States, President Ilham Aliyev of
Azerbaijan will meet with US President George W. Bush today. Aliyev
met with Vice President Dick Cheney and Deputy Secretary of State
Robert Zoellick. On Wednesday, Aliyev addressed the Council on
Foreign Relations.

Wrapping up his first visit to the United States, President Ilham
Aliyev of Azerbaijan will meet with US President George W. Bush
today. Aliyev met with Vice President Dick Cheney and Deputy Secretary
of State Robert Zoellick. On Wednesday, the first day of the visit,
Aliyev met with US Representatives and addressed the Council on
Foreign Relations. Along with bilateral relations and war on terrorism,
his speech concerned regional problems with an emphasis on Iran and
Nagorno-Karabakh, and security of energy exports and transportation
projects in the basins of the Caspian and Black seas.

Before the Azeri president’s arrival, a White House press release
announced that “the United States regards Azerbaijan as a key ally
in this strategically vital region of the world” and “an invaluable
partner assisting with Iran.” No matter how seriously the human
rights community is concerned about human rights in Azerbaijan, it
was clear that the US authorities weren’t going to raise the matter of
“the democracy shortage in Azerbaijan” during the talks.

“It was extremely important for Baku to make its worries and concerns
known to the US Administration,” said political scientist Rasim
Musabekov. “It stands to reason, however, that it was important for
the United States too, if it had invited Aliyev to Washington.”

Aliyev, a graduate from the Moscow State Institute of International
Relations (run by the Soviet Foreign Ministry at the time),
delivered his speech in English. Aliyev said that “Baku regards
relations with the United States as a strategic priority” and added
that cooperation between the two countries encompassed all spheres,
including military. Aliyev said that it was time to put an end to
“any and all speculations” on Baku’s participation “in the potential
operations in Iran nearby.” Aliyev reminded the Council on Foreign
Relations that nearly 30 million ethnic Azeris live in Iran, whose
population amounts to 70 million. And besides, Azerbaijan and Iran
signed an agreement pledging not to provide the territories for
“any threats with regard to the partner.”

Aliyev implied that Baku would make a fine intermediary in the Iranian
nuclear crisis. “If it is the opinion of the international community
that our participation is a must, then it may be discussed,” he
said. Defense Minister of Iran Mustafa Mohammed Nadjar had visited Baku
last week. “President Aliyev may tell the US authorities the correct
direction in the matter of American-Iranian relations,” he said.

Political scientist Ilgar Mamedov from Baku believes that Aliyev’s
whole visit to Washington is centered around Iran. According to
Mamedov, “the United States needed to gauge Azerbaijan’s reaction
to possible economic and political sanctions or a military operation
against Iran.”

“In return for concurrence with economic sanctions, Baku is bound to
try and secure help from America in the return of at least some of
the Armenian-occupied territories on the border with Iran,” Mamedov
said. “After all, absence of Baku’s control over these territories
will certainly render the sanctions ineffective.”

Addressing the Council on Foreign Relations, Aliyev emphasized
that territorial integrity of his country (“acknowledged by all but
Armenia”) is not to be questioned or discussed. However, Azerbaijan
is prepared to offer Nagorno-Karabakh “extensive rights of an
autonomy.” Aliyev hopes that the United States “as a world power and
one of the chairmen of the OSCE Minsk Group will facilitate resolution
of the conflict.”

The Azeri visitor complimented the hosts by saying that Azerbaijan
would have never developed its energy sector without help from
America. He said that Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan and Baku-Tbilisi-Erzerum
pipelines were “mostly regional” at first and urged the United States
and European Union to “join” the future energy projects.

Fikret Sadykhov, Director of the Center of Political Information
(Baku) believes that the invitation may be considered without undue
delays because “energy security problems in the southern part of the
Caucasus do worry the American political establishment nowadays.”

When in the United States, Aliyev praised relations with Moscow and
said that “they do not depend on any external factors.” When asked
what he thinks of the assumption that Baku and Moscow are vying for
influence in the post-Soviet zone, Aliyev replied, “Aspiring for the
role of an ‘island of stability,’ Azerbaijan considers itself a region
of cooperation, not confrontation.”

Tbilisi Is Still Taking Pokes At Russia

TBILISI IS STILL TAKING POKES AT RUSSIA
by Viktor Ruchkin

Source: Krasnaya zvezda, April 28, 2006, p. 1
Agency WPS
DEFENSE and SECURITY (Russia)
May 3, 2006 Wednesday

RUSSIAN ARMY HAS PROBLEMS CONCERNING SAFE WITHDRAWAL OF THEIR TROOPS
AND AMMUNITION FROM GEORGIA; Tbilisi will not help Russia to withdraw
its army and military equipment from Georgia. Georgia Akhalkalakskiy
region citizens blocked the highway protesting against troops
withdrawal. Georgia Minister of Internal Affairs Vano Merabishvili
remarked that Georgian authorities guarantee that no protest meetings
would be conducted by citizens against the base withdrawal from
Akhalkalaki. Georgia Minister of Foreign Affairs Gela Bezhuashvili
stated the other day that relationships between Russia and Georgia
are far not of good neighbors.

It was clear from the very beginning that Tbilisi would not take care
of safe withdrawal of Russian army from Georgia. (…) Not much time
has passed until this was proved.

Last Wednesday tens of Georgia Akhalkalakskiy region citizens blocked
the highway and made it impossible for communication troops cars,
belonging to Russian 62nd military base, to go to Armenia. That
was the way they voiced their protest against withdrawal of Russian
troops. Most of the citizens served at the Russian military base,
and now they will have no means of living. As is known, the group
of local citizens had a meeting with the base command and told them,
that until Georgia solves all the existent problems, namely the problem
of the safe life of the Armenians living in the region and employing
them, they would not allow Russian military equipment and ammunition
to leave the region. “If necessary, we will make all citizens of
Samtskhe-Dzhavakheti region take part in this action of protest”,
stressed the people.

The base command appealed to the local police command and Ministry of
Internal Affairs with a request to take care of the safe withdrawal
of military equipment. However, Georgian authorities refused to take
any measures saying this was not their responsibility. Moreover,
Georgia Minister of Internal Affairs Vano Merabishvili stated, that
the Russian side would be responsible for any problems or difficulties
when withdrawing the bases. Only after Russian Ministry of Foreign
Affairs reminded Georgia about its responsibilities according to the
signed agreement and expressed hope about Georgian authorities taking
measures in Akhalkalaki, Tbilisi agreed to act accordingly.

Namely, Vano Merabishvili remarked that Georgian authorities guarantee
that no protest meetings would be conducted by citizens against the
base withdrawal from Akhalkalaki. He is also convinced that in every
region there would be people capable of performing such actions for
destabilization of Georgia. As for the named above incident, he said
that about 20-25 people were making that performance for Russian TV
channels in Akhalkalaki as a protest against withdrawal of military
equipment from the base. The “actors” of that performance are citizens
serving at the Russian base in Akhalkalaki, and Vano Merabishvili
wants to believe that Moscow have nothing to do with this performance.

It goes without saying that Tbilisi sees Moscow in everything that
causes policy development problems for Georgia. Georgia Minister
of Foreign Affairs Gela Bezhuashvili stated the other day that
relationships between Russia and Georgia are far not of good
neighbors. It is possible to understand from his words that it is
Moscow who is to be blamed for it. When he was characterizing the
situation in Abkhazia and South Ossetia he said: “We have a number of
facts proving that Russia follows the policy of annexation concerning
Georgia”. However, the head of Georgia Foreign Policy Department
didn’t mention any of those facts, but took pokes at Russia.

Azerbaijan: 4 More People Are Sentences For Betrayal Of Motherland

AZERBAIJAN: FOUR PEOPLE MORE ARE JUDGED FOR BETRAYAL OF MOTHERLAND

Source: Information agency “Turan” (Baku), April 28, 2006
Agency WPS
DEFENSE and SECURITY (Russia)
May 3, 2006 Wednesday

In the grave crimes Court under the chairmanship of Gadim Babaev
private session of the court on the case of four military people
accused on the basis of Article 274 (Motherland betrayal) and 338.1
(infringement of action post rules) has taken place. All the four
military are accused of giving Armenia secret information. Soldiers
of military service for a regular term Binali Mamedaliev (arrested in
October 2005), Shakhriar Ismailov, Shamkhal Agadzhamaliev and Parviz
Khabibov (arrested in 2006) served in Fizulinskiy region. During
their service time they were hooked by Armenians and worked for them.

The hearing of the case will take place on May, 4. As there it concerns
secret information, the case will be closed, and no information
is given about any mentioned facts. It is not the first case when
Azerbaijan soldiers are judged for cooperation with Armenians. Armed
Forces command has not yet given any explanation to the facts.

Will Post-Soviet Territory Air Defense Be United?

WILL POST-SOVIET TERRITORY AIR DEFENSE BE UNITED?

Agency WPS
DEFENSE and SECURITY (Russia)
May 3, 2006 Wednesday

Russia is ready to establish a privileged regime for its partners
in Air Defense United System, including supplying them with modern
anti-aircraft complexes S-300

NUCLEAR SUBMARINES; The program of development of the naval strategic
nuclear force until 2010 is aimed at retaining combat readiness of
the naval strategic component and the creation of the first submarine
of generation four (project 955 Borei) with the Bulava solid-fuel
ballistic missile with MIRVs.

CIS air boundaries united defense takes a leading position in united
collective measures, taken by post-soviet countries in the military
sphere. Notwithstanding disintegration processes that are taking place
in Commonwealth countries, Air Defense United System established over
10 years ago is still working, which was revealed at the recent staff
command training of CIS Air Defense United System.

Russian Air Forces second Commander-in-chief Lieutenant-General
Aytech Bizhev stated, that aircraft alert forces of CIS Air Defense
United System have successfully fulfilled all the missions. “Over ten
missions, connected with strengthening air boundaries of CIS countries,
have been worked on”, said Bizhev. According to his words, Air Forces
Commander-in-chief Army General Vladimir Mikhailov, who was heading
the training, expressed his satisfaction with CIS countries national
army units and subdivisions, which participated in the training.

It is vital to note that forces and subdivisions of only eight CIS
countries took part in staff command training: those of Armenia,
Byelorussia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Russia, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan
and Ukraine. However, according to the agreement of February 10,
2005 Air Defense United System includes 10 countries, Georgia and
Turkmenistan besides the named eight countries. As is known, Georgia
officially left the CIS military structure last year, and Turkmenistan,
having announced its neutrality, does not participate in CIS collective
military organs activities. The role of these two countries in united
defense of CIS air border is reduced to zero, but they have influence
on CIS countries security. In fact, CIS South is not safe. Last year
Georgia prohibited Russian reconnaissance airplane A-50 to fly to the
territory of Armenia during staff command trainings of Air Defense
United System. This year pilots didn’t try to do it. Thus, it is
possible to talk only about partial air boundaries defense of Air
Defense United System. In fact, only the countries which are included
in Collective Security Treaty Organization actively participate in
CIS Air Defense United System (that is Armenia, Byelorussia, Russian
Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Kazakhstan). Ukraine and Uzbekistan take
part in staff command training on the bilateral basis. At the same
time Kyiv can cease participating in Air Defense United System if
the Ukraine will be allowed to NATO.

Moscow is trying to establish a privileged regime for Air Defense
United System countries to keep Russia’s neighbors in the limits of
the united system. For example, supplying anti-aircraft complexes with
spare parts, their maintenance and service is fulfilled by Russian
factories on the privileged basis. For these purposes there is finance
in the Russian budget. The other day Russian Air Forces General staff
Commander Boris Cheltsov stated, that anti-aircraft missiles S-300
produced by the concern “Almaz-Antey” would be in the armament of all
countries of CIS Air Defense United System. Of course, such statements
should be done by politicians, not by military men. However, is it has
been said by the representative of Air Forces Commander-in-chief, by an
authoritative military commander, it is possible to suggest that there
had already been the corresponding political decision made. Let us
remind that anti-aircraft complexes S-300 are exported to Byelorussian
without charge. From July 1 the complexes will be airborne alert. This
is a very important geopolitical step. According to the words of
Russian Air Forces second Commander-in-chief Lieutenant-General Aytech
Bizhev this fact that the complexes will be airborne alert will allow
to replace the farthest limit of the air objects hitting area to 150
kilometers to the West. The contact area will be 400 kilometers larger,
accordingly. It is a vital strategic-tactical step for the Russian
Federation. S-300 is capable of hitting a target at the height of
20-45 kilometers, applying fire to 6 targets at the same time. To
compare with, American “Patriot” can blaze away only 4 air targets.

If analogous complexes will be supplied to other countries of Air
Defense United System, Russia and its allies will be able to control
to certain degree boundaries of China, Turkey, Afghanistan, Iran,
Hungary, Czechoslovakia, Romania and of Baltic countries. It would
be an important step in providing security for the Russian Federation
and its allies. However, it is not yet clear how NATO countries will
react. Any action can cause a counter-action. It is quite possible
that the West will make up neutralization measures for CIS integrated
military structures, like Air Defense United System.

The Russian naval strategic force (…) presents units of nuclear
submarines armed with ballistic missiles at the Northern and Pacific
fleets. The units are subordinated to the General Staff. The Navy
controls their construction, combat-training and the deployment in
patrol areas.

(…) The experience gained during the creation of first nuclear
submarines and diesel submarines (projects V611 and 629) let the
USSR start creating the K-19 nuclear submarine (project 658) with
ballistic missiles in the mid-1950s. The submarine was added to
arsenals on November 22, 1960 (underwater displacement is 5,000
tons). The characteristics of the submarine: two nuclear reactors
(30,000 h.p.); underwater speed – 30 knots; depth – 300 meters,
durability – 50 days; crew – 100 people; weapons – three R-13 missiles
(D-2 complex) with the range of fire of 650 kilometers.

These submarines had to rise to the surface in order to launch
missiles. In all, eight such submarines were built.

The submarines were armed with the R-21 missiles (D-4 complex) in
1963. They could be launched from the underwater position (project
658M). The range of fire increased to 1,400 km. (…)

The Navy received project 667A submarines with 16 ballistic missiles
in 1967. They became the forefathers of a range of submarines known
in the West as Delta-I, Delta-II, Delta-III, Delta-IV (projects 667B,
667BD, 667BDR, 6677BDRM).

They carried long-range ballistic missiles. The type of warheads and
their power changed. These submarines were called strategic missile
submarines.

Project 667A submarines were produced until 1972. In all, 34
submarines were created (underwater displacement – 9,500 tons; two
nuclear reactors – 50,000 h.p.; underwater speed – 30 knots; depth –
320 meters; R-27 missiles (RSM-25 complex) with the range of fire
of 3,000 km; launch depth – 50 meters). Modernization of the project
was aimed at increasing the range of fire to 3,900 km. (…)

The USSSR built 18 project 667B submarines (underwater displacement
– 10,000 tons; two nuclear reactors (24,000 h.p. each); underwater
speed – 25 knots; depth – 320 meters; crew – 120 people; durability –
70 days; 12 R-29 missiles – 8,000 km; precision – 1.5 km) in 1972-1977.

In addition, the USSR design project 667BD submarines (underwater
displacement – 11,400 tons; nuclear reactors, underwater speed and
durability are the same; depth – 3900 meters; maximum depth – 450
meters). The strong hull was by 15 meters longer. This is why the
submarine carried 16 R-29 ballistic missiles (three MIRVs on each).

The range of fire increased to 9,000 km; precision – 900 meters.

Launch depth – 55 meters. Four such submarines were built until 1975.

(…)

Project 667BDR submarines were added to arsenals in 1976 (underwater
displacement – 10,600 tons; two nuclear reactors (60,000 h.p.);
underwater speed – 24 knots; crew – 130 people; durability – 90
days)/ In all, 14 such submarines were built until 1985. The main
peculiarity of its RSM-50 missile complex was that the missiles could
carry three different types of warheads: R-29R with three MIRVs –
6,500 km; R-29K – seven MIRVs; R-29RL – one powerful warhead, 9,000
km. The submarines carried 16 missiles. Their precision was around
900 meters. The majority of submarines were repaired and modernized
before 1991 when the collapse of the Russian defense industry began.

This is why they managed to operate in the 1990s. However, Russia
had to scrap part of submarines due to the START agreements. However,
it’s possible that some project 667BDR submarines will operate until
the creation of new generation submarines.

In response to the Trident program (Ohio submarines), the USSR
launched the Typhoon project in 1981, aiming to create project
941 submarines (…) (underwater displacement – 25,000 tons). The
submarine consisted of two strong hulls linked one light hull. The
new architecture increased the survivability of the submarine and
the reliability of weapons. The submarine had two reactors 80,000 h.p.

each. Its underwater speed was 27 knots. The depth is 500 meters. The
RSM-52 complex consists of 20 three-stage missiles (R-39) with ten
MIRVs each. The range of fire exceeds 10,000 km. The launch depth is
55 meters. The typhoon is equipped with anti-aircraft complexes. The
crew is 179 people; durability – 120 days. (…)

Project 667BDRM followed the Typhoon (seven submarines built since
1981). At present, these submarines are the foundation of the naval
strategic nuclear force. Russia will use them until 2010-15. These
submarines are superior to generation two nuclear submarines. Their
characteristics are similar with that of the Ohio submarines.

Displacement is 10,800 tons (underwater displacement – 13,000 tons);
two nuclear reactors (60,000 h.p. each); underwater speed – 24 knots;
depth – 650 meters; crew – 120 people. The RSM-54 missile complex is
armed with 16 R-29RM missiles (9,300 km). Every missile carries four
MIRVs. The missiles can destroy small targets thanks to their high
precision (missile silos, command posts and more). The submarine can
launch all missiles from the depth of 55 meters. The RSM-54 complex
is superior to the Trident-2 complex. It’s not ruled out that the
R-29MR missiles will carry ten MIRVs (due to the US’ withdrawal from
ABM). The missiles can be armed with ordinary charges and small nuclear
charges, which can destroy small targets without damaging neighboring
settlements. This means that such submarines can be used in different
military conflicts. (…)

At present, the Russian Navy has seven project 667BDRM submarines,
five project 9941 submarines and two project 667BDR submarines. Two
Typhoon submarines are in good technical condition. One of them is
involved in tests of the Bulava missile complex.

In other words, Russia has 11 strategic nuclear submarines, which carry
184 ballistic missiles with 944 warheads. Weakening of the strategic
submarine group makes the Russian military worry, especially after
the US’ withdrawal from ABM and the factual liquidation of START-I
and START-II. The US currently has 18 nuclear submarines with 432
ballistic missiles and 3,120 MIRVs.

The new agreement on strategic nuclear weapons was signed on May 24,
2002 (it came into force on June 1, 2003). According to the agreement,
Russia and the US must cut the number of strategic nuclear warheads
to 1,700-2,000 kilotons until December 31, 2012. (…)

The Russian president signed the decree to increase the naval component
of the strategic nuclear force to 55% until 2005 in 1998.

The program of development of the naval strategic nuclear force
until 2010 (…) is aimed at retaining combat readiness of the
naval strategic component and the creation of the first submarine
of generation four (project 955 Borei) with the Bulava solid-fuel
ballistic missile with MIRVs.

The submarine was laid up on November 2, 19996. The displacement
of the submarine will amount to 24,000 tons. Depth – 450 meters;
underwater speed – 30 knots. This will be the most noiseless
submarine in the world. It will combine the most up-to-date technical
solutions. The missile complex will be able to overcome anti-missile
defense. The submarine will be equipped with a rescue chamber for
1000 servicemen. (…)

The second phase of the program (2006-10) is aimed at serial production
of the new submarines, which must retain the nuclear potential of
the naval strategic nuclear force after scrapping of generation three
submarines. (…)

City Police Zero In On ‘Ethnic Gangs’

CITY POLICE ZERO IN ON ‘ETHNIC GANGS’
by Carl Schreck, Staff Writer

The Moscow Times
May 3, 2006 Wednesday

Moscow police are preparing for a citywide crackdown on so-called
ethnic gangs after two policemen were shot dead by what prosecutors
described as members of a Georgian crime group.

Police will stake out known hangouts of ethnic gangs until the
killers of police officers Andrei Ashurkov and Sergei Rebrikov,
who were gunned down early Friday in southern Moscow, are found,
a police official, speaking on the condition of anonymity customary
when discussing police operations, said Tuesday.

“Ethnic gangs” is an umbrella term that generally refers to organized
crime groups from the Caucasus.

Ashurkov and Rebrikov responded to a call from residents of an
apartment building on Ulitsa Kirovogradskaya who said they heard cries
for help from the apartment of an Armenian businessman and his family,
police said.

Ashurkov and Rebrikov walked into a hail of automatic gunfire upon
entering the apartment at around 7:30 a.m., and both died at the
scene, City Prosecutor’s Office spokesman Sergei Marchenko said. Six
suspects wearing tracksuits and black leather jackets fled the scene,
he said. No suspects have been detained.

Rebrikov, 39, is survived by a wife and daughter. Ashurkov was 28.

Following a funeral for the two officers Tuesday, deputy police chief
Vladimir Chugunov said Moscow police were “fighting an uncompromising
battle and even a war against bandits.”

“I’m confident that the killers will be identified and found,”
Chugunov said, RIA-Novosti reported. “I offer them to come in and
give themselves up.”

The Mayor’s Office emphasized the ethic background of the victims.

Spokesman Sergei Tsoi said the “ethnic Russian police officers,
who died heroically” and “acted professionally in defending an
Armenian family,” would be awarded state honors posthumously,
Interfax reported. Authorities closely track and publicize statistical
evaluations of crimes committed by foreigners, primarily from other
former Soviet republics. These statistics are cited by some groups
to justify anti-immigration policies.

Russian Nationalists Inciting Racist Violence

RUSSIAN NATIONALISTS INCITING RACIST VIOLENCE
by Chris Stephen in Moscow

The Irish Times
May 3, 2006 Wednesday

RUSSIA: Russia has seen a second weekend of racist violence unleashed
by skinhead gangs against foreigners, leaving five people wounded.

Three Syrians, a Cameroonian and a Turkish man were beaten in separate
attacks in the northern city of St Petersburg, wrapping up a bloody
month of racist violence.

It comes with police hunting a gang of skinheads who stabbed a
17-year-old Armenian to death in Moscow city centre a week ago.

The skinheads chased him along a platform of one of Moscow’s busiest
stations, knifed him and slashed his girlfriend across the face,
then leapt on to a tube train to make their escape.

On April 20th, an Indian student was stabbed to death and on April
16th a Russian student, carrying anti-fascist posters, was killed,
also by skinheads.

Other cities have reported similar racist violence, including a Tajik
cook left critically injured after being dragged out of his restaurant
by 20 teenagers and beaten up.

Dozens of graves in Jewish and Muslim cemeteries in towns outside
Moscow have been smashed in recent days.

Human rights monitoring group Sova says 79 people have been injured
by race attacks this year across Russia.

The attacks come as 13 teenagers begin a trial for the murder of a
student from Peru in the southern city of Voronezh last October –
an attack local sources say was carried out in the mistaken belief
that the man was from the Caucuses.

News of the attacks is reported, and glorified, on dozens of neo-Nazi
websites which serve an estimated 20,000 skinheads. Several sites
feature an online Manual of Street Terror, which advises skinheads
on how to corner and beat dark-skinned people.

Aficionados of such sites include 20-year-old Alexander Koptsev,
who was jailed for 13 years in April for attacking seven worshippers
with a Samurai sword in a Moscow synagogue last January.

He told his trial that he shared the belief of the websites that
Russia must be purified.

Despite scores of arrests, the authorities seem unable to quell this
tide of violence – there are always more skinheads ready to fill the
places of those caught.

Diplomats of African and Asian states have circulated warnings
to staff, one official told The Irish Times, after several were
threatened.

Last year two Polish diplomats were beaten up close to their embassy.

Some diplomats are considering moving their families out of Russia.

The attacks come amid a hardening of nationalistic opinions across
Russia. In December, nationalist opposition party Rodina, or
Motherland, was banned from Moscow local elections after screening
an advertisement that compared dark-skinned people with garbage.

One reason advanced for the rise in racism is the war in Chechnya
and terror attacks like the Beslan high school massacre. Another
is ever-growing friction with the West over issues ranging from gas
prices to the Orange Revolution.

President Vladimir Putin has condemned racism, but some think his
government is exploiting the issue to gain votes for the presidential
election in two years’ time, hoping a traumatized will turn to the
Kremlin.

“The spectre of rising nationalism will be used to frighten us into
voting for the incumbent,” said columnist Yulia Latynina in the
Moscow Times.

Moscow Policemen Declared A War On “Ethnic Gangs”

MOSCOW POLICEMEN DECLARED A WAR ON “ETHNIC GANGS”
by Viktor Tkachyov

SOURCE: Noviye Izvestia, No 76, p.6
Russica Izvestia Information Inc.
RusData Dialine – Russian Press Digest
May 3, 2006 Wednesday

Moscow police are preparing for a citywide crackdown on so-called
ethnic gangs after two policemen were shot dead by what prosecutors
described as members of a Georgian crime group.

Police will stake out known hangouts of ethnic gangs until the
killers of police officers Andrei Ashurkov and Sergei Rebrikov,
who were gunned down early Friday in southern Moscow, are found,
a police official, speaking on the condition of anonymity customary
when discussing police operations, said Tuesday. “Ethnic gangs” is
an umbrella term that generally refers to organized crime groups,
primarily from the Caucasus.

Ashurkov and Rebrikov responded to a call from residents of an
apartment building on Ulitsa Kirovogradskaya who said they heard cries
for help from the apartment of an Armenian businessman and his family,
police said.

Ashurkov and Rebrikov walked into a hail of automatic gunfire upon
entering the apartment at around 7:30 a.m., and both died at the
scene, City Prosecutor’s Office spokesman Sergei Marchenko said. Six
suspects wearing tracksuits and black leather jackets fled the scene,
he said. No suspects have been detained. Rebrikov, 39, is survived
by a wife and daughter. Ashurkov was 28.

Following a funeral for the two officers Tuesday, deputy police chief
Vladimir Chugunov said Moscow police were “fighting an uncompromising
battle and even a war against bandits.”

The Mayor’s Office emphasized the ethic background of the victims.

Spokesman Sergei Tsoi said the “ethnic Russian police officers, who
died heroically” and “acted professionally in defending an Armenian
family,” would be awarded state honors posthumously. Authorities
closely track and publicize statistical evaluations of crimes committed
by foreigners, primarily from other former Soviet republics. These
statistics are cited by some groups to justify anti-immigration
policies.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Armenian Plane Crash Relatives In Agonising Wait For Loved Ones

ARMENIAN PLANE CRASH RELATIVES IN AGONISING WAIT FOR LOVED ONES

Agence France Presse — English
May 3, 2006 Wednesday 4:25 PM GMT

SOCHI, Russia

Relatives of those who died when an Armenian plane crashed into the
Black Sea on Wednesday stared out from the 13th floor of a support
centre set up in a local hotel, wishing the return of those who
disappeared beneath the waves.

Distraught and with rings under her eyes, Larisa Sarkasyan said she
had come with a friend to the centre at the Hotel Moscow in this
Russian resort town, seeking news of her friend’s daughter, a member
of the cabin crew of the plane that crashed earlier in the day with
the loss of all 113 people on board.

“I’d wanted Mara to take something to Moscow for me, but her mother
told me she’d gone to Sochi instead — it was her first time on that
flight,” Larisa said, recalling the last hours before the death of
the 35-year-old crew member.

“Then, in the night, I found out the plane had crashed. I didn’t dare
to call, but asked my husband to,” she said.

Mara’s 12-year-old son had hardly begun to grasp what had happened.

“He’s still hoping his mother will come back,” Larisa said.

Nearby, psychologists were on hand to offer help, while investigators
questioned relatives of the dead, asking them to describe their
perished loved ones to aid the identification process.

Many relatives had come on a special flight from the Armenian capital,
Yerevan, following the crash of the Airbus A320 operated by Armenia’s
Armavia.

Other relatives gathered at the morgue in this southern town that
for most Russians conjures up images of sun, sand and respite from
harsher climes.

But authorities were for the most part staying tight-lipped.

“Mum called 10 minutes before the expected landing time to say
the plane was about to land — she already had a phone signal,”
said Akop Akopyan, who was there with his father and had lost his
mother, Zara, 49. “Ten minutes later the plane had disappeared from
the radar screens.”

Some relatives tried to extract information from policemen guarding
the morgue.

“My friend had a beauty spot on his left cheek. Have you seen him
among the bodies?” one man asked of a policeman on guard.

Two young women managed to get a policeman to show them a photograph of
one of the dead that he had taken using a camera on his mobile phone,
but it was not the body they sought.

“I’m looking for my boyfriend,” explained one of the women.

With fragments from just 49 bodies recovered by Wednesday evening,
some relatives faced a long and agonising wait, whether standing at
the morgue or staring out to sea from the hotel window.

Tears, Anger As Relatives Mourn Armenian Air Crash Victims

TEARS, ANGER AS RELATIVES MOURN ARMENIAN AIR CRASH VICTIMS

Agence France Presse — English
May 3, 2006 Wednesday 11:17 AM GMT

Stunned and in tears, the distraught families of passengers killed
when an Armenian plane plunged into the Black Sea battled Wednesday
to come to terms with the sudden loss of their loved ones.

In anguished scenes at Yerevan airport, many pinned the blame for the
crash in the early hours on Russian and Armenian aviation officials.

“My little boy was on there. He wasn’t even 25 years old,” said one
tearful mother among those at the Armenian capital’s airport.

Most relatives had heard about the crash from watching television or
after being telephoned by other family members.

Many of the 113 people who died when the Armavia Airbus A320 crashed
as it tried to land near the Russian resort town of Sochi were making
family visits, reflecting the close ties between Russia and its small
Caucasus neighbour.

Russian and Armenian officials have both blamed the crash on poor
weather conditions, saying the pilot aborted a first attempted
landing because of rain and poor visibility before wheeling round
for a second attempt.

A teenage boy, Apet Tatevosyan, appeared barely able to grasp the
news as he waited in the airport hall, as emergency workers and
officials bustled.

“My mum was on the plane. She had gone to visit her sisters who she
hadn’t seen in 15 years,” he said. “We thought she was going to call
— when she didn’t, I was worried and called our relatives in Sochi
who told us the news.”

His disbelief was echoed by Andranig Avetisyan, who also lost a
loved one.

“I lost my niece. She lives in Sochi and had come to visit us in
Yerevan,” Avetisyan said.

A woman who said she her husband had been killed lashed out at the
state of the planes operated by the Armavia national carrier.

“They tell us that these planes are in a good state. And then what?

They call that a good state!,” exclaimed the woman furiously.

The mother who had lost her son blamed Sochi’s Adler airport for
hesitating to let the plane land in heavy rain that was lashing the
coast at the time.

“If the airport had quickly allowed the plane to come in to land,
the disaster would never have happened,” she said, as a white-coated
doctor approached her to administer a sedative.

A team of four doctors was on hand at Yerevan, while Russian
authorities said psychologists were being deployed in Sochi to help
the bereaved when they arrived to help with identification of the dead.

“We have seen hysteria, hypertension, heart attacks. We have also
provided psychological help to those who need it,” said one doctor,
Larisa Arsenyan.

Some 78 of the bereaved left for Sochi early Wednesday. More were
expected to follow on a second flight later in the day.

No Evidence Of Terrorism Behind Armenian Plane Crash: Prosecutor

NO EVIDENCE OF TERRORISM BEHIND ARMENIAN PLANE CRASH: PROSECUTOR

Agence France Presse — English
May 3, 2006 Wednesday 7:06 AM GMT

Investigators have found no evidence that the crash of an Armenian
plane off Russia’s Black Sea coast on Wednesday resulted from
terrorism, Russia’s deputy prosecutor general, Nikolai Shepel, said.

“At this stage we don’t have any information to suggest the possibility
of a terrorist act against the plane,” Shepel was quoted by Interfax
news agency as saying.

Investigators continued to scour the site of the crash about six
kilometres (four miles) from the coast near the resort town of Sochi,
in which 113 people died, Russia’s emergency situations ministry said.

In particular they hoped to find the black box flight recorder that
would provide clues to the crash’s cause.

The Airbus A320 disappeared from radar screens as it made a second
attempt to land at Adler airport near Sochi early Wednesday, after
visibility had been severely reduced by heavy rain.

The prosecutor general’s office said earlier it had launched criminal
proceedings for violation of air traffic procedures leading to loss
of life.