Hamazkayin of Washington, D.C. hosts first traditional Dyaruntarach/Trndez

BETHESDA, Md.—The Hamazkayin Armenian Educational and Cultural Association welcomed families, friends and community members from throughout the Greater Washington D.C. area for the first traditional Dyaruntarach/Trndez celebration in the nation’s capital, held at the Soorp Khatch Armenian Apostolic Church’s new “River Road” property on February 18, 2024.

Victoria Penenian jumping over the fire

Hamazkayin of Washington D.C. vice-chair Kayane Kassarjian Tatarian warmly welcomed everyone to the age-old Armenian celebration of the upcoming spring and a bountiful harvest. She welcomed remarks from Soorp Khatch Armenian Apostolic Church pastor, Archpriest Fr. Sarkis Aktavoukian, who offered prayers, invoking blessings upon the gathering and its endeavors.

Hamazkayin of Washington D.C. vice-chair Kayane Kassarjian Tatarian warmly welcoming everyone to the age-old Armenian celebration

Archpriest Fr. Aktavoukian then shared the significance of the Armenian pagan rituals of Trndez, which, upon Armenia’s adoption of Christianity, was renamed Dyaruntarach, meaning “bringing forward of the Lord.” He explained that the ritual of jumping over fire is believed to ward off evil and bring the blessings of children to newly-married couples.

With anticipation mounting, Archpriest Fr. Aktavoukian initiated the lighting of the ceremonial fire, prepared by members of the ARF Sebouh Gomideh. As the flames flickered and danced, filling the air with warmth and light, the atmosphere was charged with excitement and joy.

Archpriest Fr. Sarkis Aktavoukian initiating the lighting of the ceremonial fire

The community then sang a series of traditional Vartanantz songs, voices resonating with pride and unity. Hamazkayin of Washington D.C. Van Dance Group member and AYF DC “Sevan” Juniors chair Meghri Aguilian took a moment to honor the memory of the Armenian traditional dance icon and Artsakh war veteran Gagik Ginosyan, who served as the first dance instructor of the newly-formed Hamazkayin D.C. Van Dance group. They performed the Echmiadzin dance in his honor, paying homage to his legacy and contributions.

Hamazkayin Washington D.C. Van Dance Group performing the Echmiadzin dance in Gagik Ginosyan’s honor, paying homage to his legacy and contributions

As the afternoon progressed, community members young and old eagerly took part in the ancient ritual of jumping over the fire, each leap accompanied by heartfelt wishes for a prosperous year ahead. 

Hamazkayin Washington D.C. members offered refreshments and gift lanterns to attendees, ensuring that the sacred fire and its spirit would continue to illuminate their lives long after the event concluded.

Hamazkayin Washington D.C. offered refreshments and gift lanterns to attendees, ensuring that the participants could take the sacred fire back to their homes

The inaugural traditional Dyaruntarach/Trndez in Washington D.C. was a resounding success, thanks to the dedication and vision of Hamazkayin D.C. chapter members and the Van dancers, as well as the unwavering support of Archpriest Fr. Aktavoukian. As the flames of tradition were kindled anew, it was evident that this cherished custom had found a home in the heart of the nation’s capital, promising future celebrations and gatherings filled with joy, community and cultural pride.




Armenia’s arms acquisitions exclusively for defensive purposes – Defense Minister

 12:20,

YEREVAN, FEBRUARY 23, ARMENPRESS. Armenia’s arms acquisitions aren’t directed against anyone, Minister of Defense Suren Papikyan has said.

Speaking at a joint press conference with French Defense Minister Sébastien Lecornu, Papikyan said that Armenia seeks to modernize the capabilities of its military.

“This implies that we need to supplement these needs through our resources, and of course, support of partner countries would only help us. Our approach is the following: the Republic of Armenia is buying weapons and ammunition with the purpose of protecting its territorial integrity and sovereignty. The weapons and ammunition bought by the Republic of Armenia are not meant for aggression against any country,” Papikyan said.

He added that the country is facing dangers.

“Of course, I can’t deny that there is a danger, and that danger is visible from the existing rhetoric, and it is our duty to protect the country’s territorial integrity and sovereignty. And regardless what security environment we would have after signing a peace treaty in the future, the armed forces of the Republic of Armenia will continue acquiring defensive armaments,” Papikyan said.

Russia’s invasion of Ukraine inadvertently sparks a Jewish renaissance — in Armenia

Jewish Telegraphic Agency
Feb 22 2024

YEREVAN, Armenia (JTA) — It’s just after sunset on a chilly February evening as Mama Jan begins filling up with customers. The cozy little café, located on Alexander Speniaryan Street — one block from Yerevan’s Freedom Square — lures passersby with its traditional khashlama (Armenian meat stew), dolma (stuffed grape leaves) and grappa (homemade brandy).

Inside, Edith Piaf melodies play softly in the background, while a blackboard near the bar lists the upcoming week’s activities: Saturday, a meeting of the English-speaking club; Sunday, a lecture on feminism; Wednesday, a screening of the movie “Golda,” and on Friday, Kabbalat Shabbat featuring baked challah and pomegranate wine.

Overseeing it all is Julia Kislev, a vivacious Crimean Jew who immigrated to Israel in 1992, settled in South Tel Aviv and learned fluent Hebrew. In 2016, Kislev joined her Armenian actor husband in Yerevan, and four years later, she opened Mama Jan — which has since become the unofficial gathering place of Armenia’s newest Jews, those displaced by the two-year-old Russia-Ukraine war.

“They find their shelter here,” said Kislev, 55, an Israeli citizen with local residency status.

In the two years since Russia invaded Ukraine on Feb. 24, 2022, this landlocked former Soviet republic in the Caucasus has seen a surprise influx of Jews — mostly liberal young Russians opposed to the war, but also Ukrainians seeking safe haven. Together, their arrival has boosted Armenia’s total Jewish population tenfold, from fewer than a hundred to well over 1,000 today.

That’s a big deal for an ancient land that never had many Jews to begin with, even though Armenia — the world’s first Christian nation — boasts a medieval Jewish cemetery with 64 tombstones in Hebrew and Aramaic dating back to the year 1266.

Armenia became a Soviet republic in 1920, and following World War II, Jews relocated here from Ukraine, Belarus, Moldova and Azerbaijan. But after the USSR itself collapsed in 1991, nearly the entire Jewish community of 15,000 families emigrated en masse to Israel, leaving only a handful of aging congregants to keep the dwindling community from disappearing altogether.

“If it weren’t for the war between Russia and Ukraine, there’d be maybe 50 or 100 Jews left here,” said Rabbi Gershon Meir Burshtein, spiritual leader at the Mordechay Navi Jewish Religious Center of Armenia. “We were thinking this would be the end. But then this influx of Jews came from Russia, mainly young people thirsting for Yiddishkeit.”

According to community organizer Nataniel Trubkin, some 120,000 Russian citizens fled to this Maryland-sized land of 3 million in the weeks and months following President Vladimir Putin’s unprovoked attack on Ukraine.

Some feared the draft; others were worried about sanctions and freezing of bank accounts. Their arrival contributed to a local construction boom that helped boost Armenia’s GDP by 12% in 2022 and a further 8% last year. Yet many Russians have since gone on to third countries or returned home.

Of the Russian Jews who remain, said Trubkin, about 60% are Muscovites like himself; the rest hail mainly from St. Petersburg, Novosibirsk, Yekaterinburg and Nizhny Novgorod.

“There may actually be more than 1,000 Russians with Jewish blood here, but for various reasons they have not shared their identity,” said Trubkin, who does copywriting and social media marketing for various Jewish organizations. “It’s interesting that most of these people are from the same social class — sometimes even from the same neighborhoods of Moscow.”

Likewise, of the 5,000 or so Ukrainian refugees who remain in Armenia, about 1,500 are Jews.

Trubkin, 43, is among the regular patrons at Mama Jan, which under Kislev’s supervision hosts gatherings for every major Jewish holiday including Hanukkah and Purim. Burshtein, who bears a striking resemblance to Tevye the Dairyman, comes to the café often to conduct prayers, and some of the recent Russian arrivals have begun attending Shabbat services at his synagogue — the only one in Armenia.

One reason Armenia is so attractive to these newcomers — Jewish or not — is its lack of visa restrictions. It’s also easy to get flights to Yerevan from Russia, where air travel is limited because of sanctions imposed after the war’s start. Plus, the new Russian arrivals say, the locals are warm and welcoming, both to Russians and to Jews.

That’s a sharp contrast to neighboring Georgia, 20% of which remains under Russian military occupation following the Kremlin’s 2008 invasion. Anti-Russian graffiti can be seen throughout Tbilisi, where Russian immigrants, regardless of their political beliefs, are widely resented.

And despite Armenia’s unhappiness with Israeli weapons sales to archenemy Azerbaijan, as well as Israel’s refusal to officially recognize the 1915 Ottoman genocide of more than 1 million ethnic Armenians, the new arrivals say they have been pleasantly surprised not to have encountered the kind of violent antisemitism that has existed in Russia for centuries.

“In the media, Azerbaijan has been trying really hard to paint Armenia as an antisemitic, intolerant country. I work in the media here and know full well how it works,” Trubkin said, referring to regular warnings issued by the government of Azerbaijan that Armenia is rife with Nazism.

“We have a lot of experience fighting antisemitism,” he said. “We haven’t seen any here.”

It was after a particularly vicious attack by local neo-Nazis at a Moscow subway station that St. Petersburg native Anton Ronis, 22, decided to give up his spot studying economics at a prestigious academy and leave for Armenia.

The black eye the young Jew received cemented feelings that he had experienced since the beginning of the war.

“When the war [against Ukraine] started, I began talking to my friends at school, but it was like talking to a wall,” said Ronis, who protested against the Putin regime. “I realized that I could not influence the situation. I wanted to be useful, and I understood that in Yerevan, I could do more than in Russia. Those who support this war are people with very scary ideas, and they consider me their ideological enemy.”

For the past year, Ronis has been volunteering for the past year at Dopomoga—an Armenian charity that offers Ukrainian newcomers humanitarian assistance and language classes.

Yan Schenkman, an independent journalist, fled to Armenia from Russia in March 2022, just weeks after the war began.

“There was no reason for me to stay in Moscow. It was very dangerous for me,” said the 51-year-old, who wrote about artists, musicians and other dissidents for a variety of Russian-language print and online media before his departure. He had also visited Israel but didn’t feel comfortable there because, he said, “the Israelis are very aggressive.”

Since his arrival in Yerevan, Schenkman said he only occasionally hears antisemitic comments.

“Armenians know that Israel supports Azerbaijan with arms sales. But they also understand that Russians who come here have nothing in common with Putin, in the same way they distinguish between the Israeli government and ordinary Jews,” he said. “Every country has crazy, resentful people who push propaganda. Fortunately, in Armenia, there are not many of them.”

Tatiana Kliuchnikova, 28, arrived in Armenia on March 3, 2022 — exactly one week after the war began — with her 30-year-old husband Mikhail, who had previous army experience.

“We realized he’d be among the first to be drafted if it came to mobilization, so we came here,” said Kliuchnikova, who gives English and French lessons and also works as a translator. “We also went to Israel for two weeks to see what it feels like, but we don’t know the language and it’s difficult to integrate. Here, we feel accepted.”

Kliuchnikova added that in Armenia, Russian is widely spoken, and it’s easy to make a living.

“If you had asked me six years ago, I wouldn’t have thought of leaving Russia,” she said. “But for now, we want to stay in Armenia. We don’t want to go anywhere else.”

Neuralink implants brain chip in first human

 10:27,

YEREVAN, JANUARY 30, ARMENPRESS. The first human patient has received an implant from brain-chip startup Neuralink on Sunday and is recovering well, the company's billionaire founder Elon Musk said.

"Initial results show promising neuron spike detection," Musk said in a post on the social media platform X on Monday.

Spikes are activity by neurons, which the National Institute of Health describes as cells that use electrical and chemical signals to send information around the brain and to the body, Reuters reports.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration had given the company clearance last year to conduct its first trial to test its implant on humans, a critical milestone in the startup's ambitions to help patients overcome paralysis and a host of neurological conditions.

In September, Neuralink said it received approval for recruitment for the human trial.

The study uses a robot to surgically place a brain-computer interface (BCI) implant in a region of the brain that controls the intention to move, Neuralink said previously, adding that its initial goal is to enable people to control a computer cursor or keyboard using their thoughts alone.

The implants' "ultra-fine" threads help transmit signals in participants' brains, Neuralink has said.

The first product from Neuralink would be called Telepathy, Musk said in a separate post on X. It enables control of your phone or computer, and through them almost any device, just by thinking. Initial users will be those who have lost the use of their limbs, Musk said.

RFE/RL Armenian Service – 01/30/2024

                                        Tuesday, 


Pashinian Accused Of Planning Another Concession To Turkey, Azerbaijan

        • Astghik Bedevian
        • Ruzanna Stepanian

Armenia - A picture of the Armenian coat of arms against the background of 
Yerevan and Mount Ararat, 5Jul2011.


Opposition leaders accused Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian on Tuesday of being 
ready to make another concession to Azerbaijan and Turkey after one of his top 
political allies called for a change of Armenia’s national anthem and coat of 
arms.

Both state symbols as well as Armenia’s national flag were inherited from a 
short-lived Armenian republic that existed from 1918-1920. They were slightly 
edited before being adopted by the country’s first post-Communist parliament in 
1991.

In a Telegram post, parliament speaker Alen Simonian described the “Mer 
Hayrenik” (Our Fatherland) anthem as “alien” and said it must be replaced by 
genuinely “Armenian” song corresponding to “our state and Armenian music.”

Simonian went on to mock the coat of arms that consists of a lion and an eagle 
holding a shield depicting Mount Ararat and the emblems of four royal dynasties 
that ruled ancient and medieval Armenian kingdoms.

The emblematic mountain located in modern-day Turkey is shown rising above a sea 
that presumably symbolizes the biblical Deluge. Simonian scoffed at this scene 
as well as the emblem of the Armenian kingdom of Cilicia that existed in the 
12-14th centuries in what is now southeastern Turkey.

Turkey - Armenian parliament speaker Alen Simonian meets his Turkish counterpart 
in Ankara, May 4, 2023.

Pashinian likewise criticized the Armenian coat of arms last year, saying that 
it underlines a “dichotomy between historical Armenia and real Armenia.”

Reacting to Simonian’s comments, Armenian opposition lawmakers claimed that 
Pashinian’s government is planning to scrap the state symbols in order to 
placate Ankara.

“This is another demand of the Turkish-Azerbaijani duo,” said Gegham Manukian of 
the main opposition Hayastan alliance. He said that the two Turkic allies are 
trying to force Yerevan to erase any reference to millennia-old Armenian 
presence in their current territory.

“They need a small state which is detached from its roots and with which they 
could do anything they want,” added Manukian.

Hrach Hakobian, a parliament deputy from the ruling Civil Contract party and 
Pashinian’s brother-in-law, ruled out any “coercion” from Baku or Ankara. He 
said the questions raised by Simonian need to be openly debated.

A spokeswoman for Simonian insisted, meanwhile, that the speaker expressed his 
personal view and that there is no bill in circulation calling for the kind of 
changes that were advocated by him. Such changes would have to be put on a 
referendum.

Russia - Azeri President Ilham Aliyev and Armenian Prime Minister Nikol 
Pashinyan are seen during a visit to the Catherine Palace in Saint Petersburg, 
December 26, 2023.

Simonian’s statement came on the heels of Pashinian’s calls for the adoption of 
a new Armenian constitution reflecting the “new geopolitical environment” in the 
region. Critics believe that the premier wants to get rid of a preamble to 
Armenia’s current constitution enacted in 1995. The preamble makes an indirect 
reference to a 1989 declaration on Armenia’s unification with Nagorno-Karabakh 
and calls for international recognition of the 1915 Armenian genocide in Ottoman 
Turkey.

Foreign Minister Ararat Mirzoyan acknowledged last week Azerbaijan has objected 
to this constitutional introduction during talks on a peace treaty with Armenia. 
But both he and Pashinian allies said that the Armenian leadership is not 
seeking to change the constitution under Azerbaijani pressure.

The Azerbaijani Foreign Ministry claimed on Monday that the Armenian 
constitution contains “encroachments on the territorial integrity and 
sovereignty of Azerbaijan.” It said Yerevan should take concrete steps to 
eliminate them.

Arusyak Julhakian, another lawmaker representing Pashinian’s party, accused Baku 
of trying to whip up political tensions in Armenia with such statements.




Fitch Sees Armenia’s Continued Dependence On Russia

        • Robert Zargarian

U.S. -- Fitch Ratings logo in Lower Manhattan, New York, June 24, 2016.


The Armenian economy will remain heavily dependent on Russia in the foreseeable 
future, according to credit rating agency Fitch.

“Armenia's economy is highly dependent on Russia for trade and energy, and Fitch 
does not expect meaningful diversification away from Russia in the near term,” 
it said in a weekend statement that reaffirmed its “BB-“ rating for the country.

Fitch noted that Russian-Armenian trade has increased dramatically since the 
start of Russia’s war against Ukraine.

“Armenia continues to implement Western sanctions targeted at Russian entities 
within its banking sector,” it said. “Nevertheless, goods exports to Russia 
increased by nearly 300 percent since 2021, and Russia accounted for 51 percent 
of exports and 30 percent of imports in [the first nine months of 2023.]”

Russia accounted for more than one-third of Armenia’s foreign trade in 
January-November 2023, with bilateral commercial exchange rising by over 40 
percent to $6.3 billion, according to Armenian government data.

Armenian re-exports of used cars, consumer electronics and other 
Western-manufactured goods remained the main driving force behind this growth. 
They are included in overall Armenian exports to Russia that totaled about $3.2 
billion in that period, up by 50 percent year on year. These and other cash 
inflows from Russia are a key reason why the Armenian economy was on course to 
expand by over 8 percent last year.

Economy Minister Vahan Kerobian said recently that his government is trying to 
“diversify” Armenia’s foreign trade by helping local manufacturers find new 
export markets. He said they should export “products of high standards and 
quality” that can find buyers “in many countries of the world and not just a 
small circle of countries.” It is not clear just how the government will go 
about achieving this declared objective.

Russian-Armenian commercial ties have been deepening despite Yerevan’s strained 
relationship with Moscow noted by Fitch. Citing food safety concerns, a Russian 
government agency blocked the import of many food products from Armenia for more 
than a week in November. Observers believe that Moscow thus underlined its 
strong economic leverage against Armenia to warn Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian 
against further reorienting the country towards the West.




Annual Corruption Survey Finds Little Change In Armenia

        • Nane Sahakian

Germany -- Microphone cables dangle over a logo of Transparency International 
(TI) during a press conference in Berlin, 23Sep2008


Transparency International has barely upgraded Armenia’s position in its annual 
survey of corruption perceptions around the world, again noting a lack of 
significant improvement in the country.

Armenia ranks 62nd out of 180 countries and territories evaluated in the 
Berlin-based watchdog’s 2022 Corruption Perception Index (CPI) released on 
Tuesday. It shared 63rd place with Romania in the previous CPI released a year 
ago.

The South Caucasus state’s CPI “score,” measured on a 100-point scale, rose from 
46 to 47 over the past year. The Armenian government had pledged to have it 
gradually raised to 55 in its three-year anti-corruption strategy approved in 
2019.

Varuzhan Hoktanian, the head of Transparency International’s Armenian partner 
organization, downplayed the slight improvement, saying that it is within the 
CPI survey’s 2.5-point margin of error and only shows continuing “stagnation” in 
the government’s declared fight against corruption.

“The global [CPI] average is 43 … So I say this every year: if a country’s CPI 
is below 50 it means corruption is a serious problem there,” Hoktanian told 
reporters.

“In the two years following the 2018 Velvet Revolution, Armenia experienced 
significant democratic and anti-corruption reforms,” Transparency International 
said in a report attached to the latest CPI rankings. “However, progress against 
corruption has stalled, primarily due to the limited implementation of these new 
measures.”

Armenia - Prime Minsiter Nikol Pashinian inspects a newly renovated school gym 
in Lori province, January 3, 2024.

Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian has repeatedly claimed to have eliminated 
“systemic corruption” in Armenia. However, members of his entourage are 
increasingly accused by Armenian media of enriching themselves or their cronies 
and breaking their anti-corruption promises given in 2018. There are also 
growing questions about integrity in public procurement administered by the 
current government.

About a year ago, Pashinian urged senior Armenian officials to sue media outlets 
“falsely” accusing them of illicit enrichment. Shortly afterwards, hackers 
hijacked the YouTube channel of the Yerevan newspaper Aravot just as it was 
about to publish a video report detailing expensive property acquisitions by 
several senior government officials and pro-government parliamentarians.

In December, the Armenian parliament controlled by Pashinian’s Civil Contract 
party effectively fired the head of a state anti-corruption watchdog who 
investigated many pro-government lawmakers suspected of illicit enrichment, 
conflict of interest or other corrupt practices. The National Assembly ignored a 
joint statement in support of the official, Haykuhi Harutiunian, issued by 
several Armenian civic organizations.



Reposted on ANN/Armenian News with permission from RFE/RL
Copyright (c) 2024 Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty, Inc.
1201 Connecticut Ave., N.W. Washington DC 20036.

 

Canada revokes ban on military exports to Turkey, Armenian community condemns move

Al-Arabiya, UAE
Jan 30 2024

AFP - Canada announced Monday it would no longer bar certain arms exports to Turkey, a move that comes approximately a week after Ankara ratified Sweden’s NATO membership.

Permits for military items and certain types of weapons destined for Turkey “will now be reviewed on a case-by-case basis,” the Canadian government said in a notice to exporters.

For all the latest headlines follow our Google News channel online or via the app.

It declared that the denial policy on exports was “no longer in place.”

Canada officially blocked military arms exports to Turkey in April 2021 after a probe found Canadian drone technology exported to Turkey had been used by Azerbaijan in clashes with Armenia.

The export ban affected some 30 permits, and applied to a wide variety of military goods and technologies including components for the production of aircraft, software and technical data for flight simulators, satellite equipment and firearm components.

Canada will now require that Turkish importers provide assurances about the weapons’ use as well as a government statement “clearly indicating whether the items will be re-exported or transferred to a non-NATO country.”

Canada additionally “has broad authority to suspend or cancel permits,” the notice said.

The move comes less than a week after Turkey’s parliament ratified Sweden’s membership in the NATO defense alliance, following initial objections and more than a year of delays.

After Ankara’s ratification, the US government approved a $23 billion deal to sell F-16 warplanes to Turkey.

However, the Armenian National Committee of Canada on Monday condemned the move in a statement.

“This decision has raised alarming concerns within the Armenian-Canadian community, as it compromises Canada’s commitment to human rights, international security, and justice,” it said.

Foreign Minister Mirzoyan congratulates Indian counterpart on Republic Day

 19:41,

YEREVAN, JANUARY 26, ARMENPRESS.  Armenian Foreign Minister Ararat Mirzoyan has sent a congratulatory message to the Indian Foreign Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar on the occasion of India's national holiday, Republic Day.

"Warm greetings to my dear colleague  Dr. S. Jaishankar  and  friendly people of India  on occasion of Republic Day. 

Building on our enhanced bilateral agenda, Armenia  stands ready to work jointly towards common goals and raising our friendly relations and partnership to a new level,'' Armenian Foreign Minister said in a post on X.

AW: Where is the outrage? Our passivity is alarming!

The global Armenian nation has a well-deserved reputation as a peaceful and valuable community. Whether in the homeland or our vast diaspora, our people have opted for civil relations internationally and contributed to the development of our earthly civilization. There have been times in our history when our affinity for peace has been confused with a tendency for passivity. They are not the same and should not be viewed as interchangeable. A peaceful nation is usually connected with respectful behavior and a commitment to avoiding conflict. This clearly describes Armenia, particularly in modern times when its military actions have consistently been in a defensive mode. One can advocate for peace, but if the other party seeks violence, then defending your rights comes into play. 

This is the story of 1918 and more recently of the Republics of Armenia and Artsakh. Passivity means accepting the current reality with minimal resistance. If one lives on the eastern and southern border regions of Armenia, they experience a commitment to peace but not passivity. The people of Tavush, Kapan, Goris and the surrounding villages know the difference between praying for peace and accepting oppression. If you frequent the cafes of Yerevan, you might find a different perspective. Patriotism and activism are more of an academic exercise, given the geographic distance from the challenges facing the border regions. There is a more urbane and casual approach to what our border regions experience each day. It is far more complicated in the diaspora. Most diaspora Armenians possess an opinion on the issues of peace and the risks of passivity, but the physical distance and cultural aloofness enable opinions without commitment. Thankfully, many in the diaspora have discovered an identity that allows for “skin in the game,” either through philanthropy, dual citizenship or onsite participation, but the majority remain on the periphery. The challenges facing Armenia’s sovereignty over the last 30 years have sharpened our understanding of the mission of the diaspora. While contributions have evolved from financial support to NGO development and repatriation, the diaspora has struggled with its public political support role. This is partially due to the diversity of what we refer to as the diaspora. Is it the role of the diaspora to support the republic or to express views that may be independent? What is patriotism? I wish the struggle was limited to a difference of perspectives. Unfortunately, ambivalence is a major concern.

This political identity challenge is partially hidden from view because of the strong public infrastructure of our organizational foundation with groups such as the ANCA, Assembly, ARS and AGBU. Technology and marketing platforms have inflated the public perception of these groups, which benefits both Armenia and the organizations. They are led by patriotic Armenians with notable commitment. In spite of these impressive foundations, our best work is done through programs that are organized over time, not with sudden changes in our political environment. In the last two years, Armenians have suffered physically and psychologically with the atrocities committed in Artsakh. The illegal blockade and forced deportation of the entire population are surreal reminders of the genocidal policies of Ottoman Turkey. The diaspora’s response through humanitarian aid has been admirable. Our generosity knows no bounds for our brethren. To the extent that local parishes have organized efforts or national groups have mobilized, it has been inspiring and meaningful, albeit time consuming. Our political responses have been less effective. 

Free Armenian POWs silent protest, Cambridge, Mass., May 2021 (Photo: Knar Bedian)

I am particularly concerned about the lack of public outrage over the up to 80 hostages held by Azerbaijan, including civilians and former government officials of Artsakh. We should not be surprised by the Azeri criminals. They have consistently violated international law for decades through humanitarian and territorial violations and human rights abuses. This is a country that commits genocide through blockades designed to starve an entire population and ignores the international court they have committed to honor. Azerbaijan is an uncivilized dictatorship, and we know this. We should focus on the passivity of our response to Azerbaijan’s hostage taking. These are not POWs held in accordance with an international convention. These are political prisoners held as hostages to extract a political ransom. We have failed to display a sustained public outrage demanding resolution.

We live in a time when the national media is flooded on a daily basis with pictures of the Israeli hostages held by Hamas. Despite the atrocities committed by Israel in response, with the complete devastation of Gaza and over 25,000 lives lost (majority of them women and children), the focus remains on the hostages. One of the ways our passivity manifests is through rationalization for inaction in the diaspora. Many Armenians say it is unfair to compare ours to the Israeli/Palestinian conflict. There is some merit to this argument, but where are our posters, vigils and demonstrations? While our compatriots rot in Azeri prisons, our inaction is depressing. Are we numb over the volume of atrocities? Are we fatigued by the continuous losses? Have we become overwhelmed with a belief that our actions don’t count? Or is it that we simply don’t care? I have asked these questions of many Armenians in the American diaspora. As you can well imagine, there are a variety of responses, ranging from ‘It is our leaders’ responsibility’ to ‘No one is listening.’ Perhaps the most alarming response that I have encountered comes from individuals with negative opinions of some of the prisoners. I found this to be particularly unfortunate. Our hostages should be viewed only as fellow Armenians held by a barbaric enemy. Anything that connects inaction to political views is irresponsible and keeps us in political infancy. Our limited activism on the Armenian hostages is an example of the challenges facing the diaspora politically. How can we declare our solidarity with our imprisoned brethren yet offer little in terms of meaningful support? Maintaining awareness in a world crowded with tragedies is an important role of the diaspora. It is important  to distinguish between legal advocacy, such as litigation filed with the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) on behalf of the jailed hostages, and the type of public activism we are all capable of in every diaspora community.    

The activists who fight against Azeri oppression and community passivity usually take a long-term view of this work. It is important that they not become disheartened by underwhelming support. They understand that it is always a well-organized minority who works to inspire the majority. We should be thankful for their dedication, but the best way to honor their commitment is to become and stay active.

Community-based activism has two primary purposes. The first and most visible is to influence decision makers in government or other important circles. Another objective that is often taken for granted is to keep the Armenian community itself aware, informed and energized. Maintaining generational continuity in activism is critical to sustaining our advocacy campaigns. The ANCA and Armenian Assembly both operate with a core of dedicated resources who are ardent activists and financial supporters, but they actually represent a small plurality of the community. This is fairly typical of how community activism works. They count on the peripheral majority to support public programs such as demonstrations, educational programs and lobbying. Our performance to date on current issues is questionable. Sustainable public events are infrequent. There are noble efforts sponsored by the AYF and Zoravik that need stronger public support. The activists who fight against Azeri oppression and community passivity usually take a long-term view of this work. It is important that they not become disheartened by underwhelming support. They understand that it is always a well-organized minority who works to inspire the majority. We should be thankful for their dedication, but the best way to honor their commitment is to become and stay active. Our hostages in Azerbaijan need our public support to keep the focus on their release. It is not enough for us to occasionally share our private disgust with the crimes of Azerbaijan. If the Armenian community does not display its unrelenting commitment to reversing this tragedy, then what can we expect of third party mediators? We must garner our energy and channel it effectively in the public domain. There are too many problems in this world to resolve in a timely manner. Influence, visibility and aligning interests determine who gets rewarded. 

Armenia and Azerbaijan are engaged in volatile peace negotiations that at some point will address territorial integrity, border demarcation and the hostages. It should be our role to keep the spotlight on the illegal incarceration of the citizens, soldiers and public servants. During the Artsakh blockade, I shared the work of two New York Armenians who sponsored a daily (weekday) vigil in front of the United Nations to bring attention to the genocidal blockade denying the people of Artsakh basic human necessities. It was very effective, because it was simple and sustainable. It attracted a diverse audience of Armenians, who established relationships that have opened new avenues. Their work was visible in Artsakh and gave hope to those suffering that they were not forgotten. 

It is important to advocate for land and rights, but the release of our hostages is comparable to providing humanitarian relief to our Artsakh refugees. The eight former members of the Artsakh government are brave individuals who consciously decided to stay with their people. They didn’t attempt to use their positions for a privileged exit. They were detained as deportees by the Azeri military. There are others who were defending their homes, seeking medical help or simply living in their ancestral homeland. To the Azeris, they are traitors and disloyal, which is reminiscent of the Turkish revisionism that has educated generations that the Armenians were problematic. To all Armenians, they are our brothers and sisters who are deserving of our best efforts to secure their freedom.They must never be forgotten, and we have a responsibility to advocate. The best way to oppose this threat of passivity is to stand tall against the injustices that remain unresolved. Activism dilutes passivity. Each of us is capable of organizing public events to educate and promote an end to their imprisonment. It is here in the diaspora, living in the midst of the European Union, United Nations and their affiliates, that we can keep this topic fresh while the negotiations continue. If you are feeling helpless concerning Artsakh (I have heard this from many), immerse yourself in the humanitarian work of the deportees and the plight of our hostages. It is important work, and you will be making a contribution to reduce dangerous passivity.

Columnist
Stepan was raised in the Armenian community of Indian Orchard, MA at the St. Gregory Parish. A former member of the AYF Central Executive and the Eastern Prelacy Executive Council, he also served many years as a delegate to the Eastern Diocesan Assembly. Currently , he serves as a member of the board and executive committee of the National Association for Armenian Studies and Research (NAASR). He also serves on the board of the Armenian Heritage Foundation. Stepan is a retired executive in the computer storage industry and resides in the Boston area with his wife Susan. He has spent many years as a volunteer teacher of Armenian history and contemporary issues to the young generation and adults at schools, camps and churches. His interests include the Armenian diaspora, Armenia, sports and reading.


Armenia fulfills Aliyev’s demand? Pashinyan proposes a new constitution

Jan 22 2024
  • JAMnews
  • Yerevan

Pashinyan proposes new constitution

“The Republic of Armenia needs a new constitution, not constitutional amendments, but a new constitution. And this issue should be the subject of a broad discussion,” Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said.

Armenian experts claim that Pashinyan is essentially fulfilling the demand of Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev, who spoke of the need to provide Baku with guarantees that there will be no “attempts at revanchism” in Armenia. They believe that it is for this purpose that the prime minister proposes to adopt a new legal framework; they also do not rule out pressure from Turkey.

The Armenian Constitution refers to the 1990 Declaration of Independence, the first paragraph of which mentions the joint resolution of the Supreme Council of the Armenian SSR and the National Council of Nagorno-Karabakh of December 1, 1989 “On the Reunification of the Armenian SSR and Nagorno-Karabakh”.

In addition, the declaration enshrines the main provisions of statehood formation, from the establishment of relations with other countries to the demand for “international recognition of the 1915 Armenian genocide in Ottoman Turkey”.


  • Signing of Armenia-Azerbaijan peace treaty is only theoretically possible
  • “By providing a corridor, Armenia can request a road to the Black Sea.” Opinion
  • “You can’t invade Armenia’s territory”. Response of the Speaker of the National Assembly of Armenia to Aliyev

The Prime Minister announced his proposal at the Ministry of Justice, where a report of work carried out by the ministry in 2023 was discussed:

“I am convinced, and time has confirmed, though after stages of some doubts – at least for me and for a number of colleagues – that the parliamentary model of governance is the most appropriate for Armenia, taking into account our democratic aspirations and strategies.”

Pashinyan also said little will change in the current model of governance. What is important to him politically is that

  • The Republic of Armenia have a constitution adopted by the people with the results of the vote beyond doubt,
  • the constitution make the country more competitive and viable in the new geopolitical and regional environment.

Last year Armenia’s prime minister spoke of disagreement with the Declaration of Independence, which contained a “confrontational narrative”. Until Pashinyan’s latest statement on the need for a new constitution, only amendments to the main law had been discussed. The reform concept has not yet been published; the ministry has sent it to the government. The discussions will start this month. It is planned to approve the concept in three months.

A day after declaring the need to adopt a new constitution, Pashinyan said at a meeting of the initiative group of the ruling Civil Pact party:

“We want additional guarantees from Azerbaijan, and Azerbaijan from us.”

The Prime Minister explained that he was referring to guarantees to exclude territorial claims against each other. According to him, both countries see subtexts in the peace treaty proposals that could be transformed into “territorial claims, if not today, then in the future.”

“We expect guarantees that Azerbaijan does not intend to leave hidden threats in the subtext for future territorial claims against Armenia. We want such guarantees, but we are also ready to give such guarantees. This is an interconnected process.”

But he did not directly say whether his proposal for new constitution was linked to the provision of these guarantees.

This is how the parliamentary opposition viewed the Prime Minister’s proposal. Gegham Manukyan, Anna Grigoryan, Kristine Vardanyan and Artur Khachatryan, MPs from the Hayastan faction (Armenia), made a joint statement.

In their opinion, Pashinyan is thus “preparing the ground for meeting another demand” of the Turkish-Azerbaijani tandem:

“The demands constantly made to the Republic of Armenia by Turkey and Azerbaijan have been the exclusion of the provisions on the right of the Artsakh people to self-determination and commitment to international recognition of the Armenian genocide from the fundamental documents of the Republic of Armenia.”

In his opinion, one could talk about an important and new milestone in the development of statehood, if we are talking about political and public discussions on the foundations of statehood.

“Pashinyan, on the other hand, needs a new constitution to ‘edit’ Armenia’s declaration of independence (to exclude what Aliyev calls ‘revanchism’), to establish ‘legitimate’ borders with a new ‘cadastral’ certificate,” Surenyants stated.

He believes that the prime minister is announcing the reduction of Armenia’s territory and wants to give this process a “nationwide package, according to the cadastral certificate certified by Aliyev.”

He studied articles by representatives of expert and political circles of Azerbaijan on this topic. He quoted one Azerbaijani expert, Rusif Huseynov, as saying that “Armenia’s legislation still contains territorial claims to Azerbaijan.”

“Such a legal background causes concern in Azerbaijan, where they predict such scenarios, when the Armenian Constitutional Court may reject the peace agreement or a future change of power may lead to territorial claims,” the political scientist wrote on Facebook.

He says that if the constitution were amended, the first two clauses based on the declaration of independence would remain unchanged:

“The declaration of independence takes as its basis the objectives of the existence of Artsakh and its unification with Armenia. In order not to preserve all this, Pashinyan says: let’s tear this paper up, throw it away, because Aliyev made a demand and I have to fulfill it.”

He does not rule out that in the future the ruling team will also raise the issue of adopting a new declaration so that the word “Artsakh” is mentioned in it.

“In addition to what is written about the unification of Armenia and Nagorno-Karabakh, there is also an article recognizing the genocide committed by Turkey in Western Armenia and Anatolia.”

Grigoryan says it is necessary to understand exactly what changes Pashinyan is thinking about, whether there is a need for them or whether all this is being done under pressure.

According to him, the new constitution presupposes significant changes. He wonders how the Prime Minister envisions a new constitution if its main provisions are not changed and the model of governance is not changed.

https://jam-news.net/pashinyan-proposes-new-constitution/

Armenia considers NATO standards in new military uniform

 14:02,

YEREVAN, JANUARY 23, ARMENPRESS. Armenian authorities consider introducing new, NATO-standard uniforms in the military.

In comments for Sputnik Armenia, the Ministry of Defense said it has studied ‘uniforms of NATO member countries, including the USA, France, Greece and the Czech Republic’ for the initiative.

“In the selection procedure for the new uniforms, the Ministry of Defense of the Republic of Armenia is guided by studies carried out through the exchange of international experience and in accordance with NATO standards. Samples of the uniforms of NATO member countries, including the US, France, Greece and the Czech Republic have been studied,” the Ministry of Defense told Sputnik Armenia in written comments.

Furthermore, the Armenian Ministry of Defense also seeks to ban the sale of standard-issue military uniforms.